Skip to content

· Private foundation

Edouard R Gerschel Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$60k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$133kYouth Development$93kArts & Culture$72kRecreation & Sports$69kHealth$990
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
$7,340
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE WINDWARD SCHOOL$25,000
THE ALLEN-STEVENSON SCHOOL$20,000
JAZZ ASPEN SNOWMASS$7,340
CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION$5,000
LES DAMES D'ASPEN LTD$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $4k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$354k · 8 repeat orgs$15k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +54% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$354k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+54%
+44%

Still filing today

100%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationRecreation & SportsArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE WINDWARD SCHOOL
    5× · 2020–2024 · $105k · revenue +7%
  • JA
    JAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS
    8× · 2017–2024 · $58k · revenue +85%
  • US
    United States Ski Association
    3× · 2017–2019 · $27k · revenue +58%

Funded once

  • US
    US SKI AND SNOWBOARD TEAM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $9k
  • TB
    THE BRICK CHURCH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • NL
    NYU LANGONE
    one grant, 2019 · $775
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Skiing Foundation

United states skiing foundation is engaged in not-for-profit membership, competition, training, development, and educational activities related to amateur skiers and snowboarders who are, or aspire to become, members of the u.s. ski and…

—
2
Ussa Investment Fund

Operates exclusively to manage the investment of endowment gifts made for the benefit of supporting the development, training, and competition of elite national, international, and development athletes in skiing and snowboarding.

Recreation & Sports
3
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

—
4
Ashbrook Independent School

To challenge and nurture academically capable students.

Education
5
Breck School

We create confident learners who lead lives of intellectual curiosity, self-knowledge, and social responsibility.

Education
6
American Snowsports Education Association

The organization was incorporated for the purposes of promotion, education, and setting of standards for ski and snowboard instruction by professional ski and snowboard instructors.

—
7
United States Ski Team Foundation

Operates for the benefit and support of world-class skiing and snowboarding, including coaching and training athletes in these sports.

Recreation & Sports
8
Fountain Valley School of Colorado

Fountain valley school of colorado provides a transformative curriculum in a supportive environment where students are challenged to think critically, become leaders, and live by our core values: courage, compassion, curiosity,…

Education
9
The Seattle Academy of Arts & Sciences

Seattle academy is a dynamic community that challenges students to question, imagine, and create in order to contribute to a changing world.

Education
10
The Language Academy of Sacramento

The las mission is to create a learning community where students: utilize bilingualism and biliteracy (spanish and english) to achieve academic excellence and apply skills in real-world situations and diverse settings; develop and exhibit…

Education
11
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
12
Ashland University

Ashland university, guided by our christian heritage, is a comprehensive, private university that provides a transformative learning experience, shaping graduates who work, serve and lead with integrity in their local, national, and global…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Allen-Stevenson School; the most unlike its peers is Les Dames D'Aspen Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE WINDWARD SCHOOL: $105,000 · EducationTHE WINDWARD SCHOOLTHE BIRCH WATHEN LENOX SCHOOL: $22,800 · EducationTHE BIRCH WATHEN LENOX SCHOOL+1 more: $350 · EducationTHE ALLEN-STEVENSON SCHOOL: $93,000 · OtherTHE ALLEN-STEVENSON SCHOOLLes Dames D'Aspen LTD: $14,700 · OtherLes Dames D'Aspen LTDUS SKI AND SNOWBOARD TEAM FOUNDATION: $9,000 · OtherUS SKI AND SNOWBOARD TEAM FOUNDATIONTHE BRICK CHURCH SCHOOL: $5,000 · Other+2 more: $990 · OtherJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS: $57,640 · Arts & CultureJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNO…United States Ski Association: $27,000 · Recreation & SportsUnited Stat…ASPEN VALLEY SKISNOWBOARD CLUB INC: $10,260 · Recreation & SportsASPEN VALLE…CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $23,100 · Human Services
Education$128,150Other$122,690Arts & Culture$57,640Recreation & Sports$37,260Human Services$23,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE WINDWARD SCHOOL: $105,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALLEN-STEVENSON SCHOOL: $93,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS: $57,640 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetUnited States Ski Association: $27,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $23,100 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BIRCH WATHEN LENOX SCHOOL: $22,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLes Dames D'Aspen LTD: $14,700 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetASPEN VALLEY SKISNOWBOARD CLUB INC: $10,260 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetINDEPENDENT SCHOOL ALLIANCE FOR MINORITY AFFAIRS: $350 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE WINDWARD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE ALLEN-STEVENSON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds JAZZ AT ASPEN-SNOWMASS ↗
  • Who funds United States Ski Association ↗
  • Who funds CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BIRCH WATHEN LENOX SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Les Dames D'Aspen LTD ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN VALLEY SKISNOWBOARD CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds INDEPENDENT SCHOOL ALLIANCE FOR MINORITY AFFAIRS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bessemer Giving FundNJ13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bessemer Giving Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Edouard R Gerschel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Edouard R Gerschel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Edouard R Gerschel Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Edouard R Gerschel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Edouard R Gerschel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph