How much did EDMOND N & VIRGINIA H MORIARTY grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 76% of EDMOND N & VIRGINIA H MORIARTY’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

health

2021

lowcountry

2022

children'sofficebowdoinlowcountry

2023

churchchildren'sbowdoinkitchen

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k30 grants · $33k
$10k–50k9 grants · $105k

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.3M

Total assets

Largest grants

ST PETER'S PREP$22,661
ST VINCENT'S ACADEMY$12,000
ST IGNATIUS SCHOOL$10,000
BROOKLYN JESUIT PREP$10,000
OAK KNOLL SCHOOL$10,000
CRISTO-REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
SETON HALL PREP GRIFFIN BRIDGES PROGRAM$10,000
CORNELIA CONNELLY CENTER$10,000
ST PETERS UNIVERSITY$10,000
FEEDING THE CAROLINAS$5,000
FAIRWINDS NANTUCKET COUNSELING CENTER$3,000
THE UPPER VALLEY HAVEN$1,500
NORTHERN NY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,500
KEMMERER HARDING LIBRARY$1,500
THE UNIT FOUNDATION$1,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6% — the area typically sits at 12%. 15% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$550k · 46 repeat orgs$71k to everyone else

46 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$550k

$47k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%

Still filing today

37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationHuman ServicesFood & NutritionEnvironmentHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

CN
CRISTO-REY NEW YORK HIGH SCHOOL
5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +2%
BJ
BROOKLYN JESUIT PREP
5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +58%
UV
UPPER VALLEY HAVEN
5× · 2020–2024 · $8k · revenue +72%

Funded once

ND
NOTRE DAME MT CARMEL CHURCH
one grant, 2023 · $10k
VF
VT FLOOD RESPONSE & RECOVERY FUND 2023-THE VERMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
one grant, 2023 · $5k
NN
NORTHERN NY COMMUNITY FUNDATION
one grant, 2020 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Bancroft a New Jersey Non Profit

Programs and services for individuals with a variety of challenging diagnoses.

Human Services

Island Harvest Ltd

The mission of island harvest is to end hunger and reduce food waste on long island.

Human Services

Northwest New Jersey

Norwescap creates opportunities that improve the lives of individuals and families with low income

Human Services

Hackensack Riverkeeper Inc

Hackensack riverkeeper defends the public trust resources of the hackensack river watershed through environmental action, advocacy, education and litigation. as citizen stewards for the watershed, hackensack riverkeeper promotes…

Environment

Quiet Oaks

Provide comfort and care to terminally ill persons and their families in a home-like setting

Human Services

Greater Springfield Habitat for

To create safe, decent, affordable housing for those in need, and to make decent shelter a matter of conscience with people everywhere.

Housing & Shelter

Home Care Options Inc

To serve the expanding and evolving in-home needs of residents of northern nj.

Human Services

Habitat for Humanity

To implement the gospel of jesus christ in sussex county, nj, throughout the u.s., and around the world by working with economically disadvantaged people to help them to create a better human habitat in which to live/work.

—

Habitat for Humanity of the Tri-State

Construction of homes for qualifying low income families.

Housing & Shelter

Mount Desert Land and Garden Preserve

The mission of the mount desert land & garden preserve is to conserve and share the beauty of our historic lands and gardens.

—

Advance Housing Inc

The mission of advance housing, inc. is to expand the range and scope of supportive housing opportunities available to persons with psychiatric disabilities. in addition, we will seek to make similar options and services available to other…

Housing & Shelter

The Wildcat Sanctuary

Provide sanctuary to wild cats in need and inspire change to end the captive wildlife crisis.

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Interfaith Food Pantry Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tudor City Greens Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/41

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,524

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

38 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

38/38

Grantees still filing

35/38

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$481,411Education$105,500Food & Nutrition$11,500Human Services$9,000Environment$5,250Philanthropy$4,500Animals$3,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ20.8× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Coastal Community Foundation of South · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Mimi Washington Starrett Foundation · The Joanna Foundation · Fm Kirby Foundation Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Verizon Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation EDMOND N & VIRGINIA H MORIARTY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: LOWCOUNTRY MARINE MAMMAL NETWORK.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~14 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 7.5× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 814887156 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on LOWCOUNTRY MARINE MAMMAL NETWORK, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 14 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 1% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Edmond N & Virginia H Moriarty?

Find your warmest path to Edmond N & Virginia H Moriarty through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

EDMOND N & VIRGINIA H MORIARTY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

38 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Edmond N & Virginia H Moriarty?

More from the funding graph

EDMOND N & VIRGINIA H MORIARTY

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

38 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Edmond N & Virginia H Moriarty?

More from the funding graph