Skip to content

Illinois · Private foundation

Edith Curtis Armstrong and Florence E Curtis Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$67k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
11
Grants FY2024
5
Organizations funded FY2023
40%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$15,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 5
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
2
Total assets, FY2024
$863k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 40% of the organizations Edith Curtis Armstrong and Florence E Curtis Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 58% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23
EducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving11$67k91%
FY20235$60k40%
FY20224$154k50%
FY20212$33k100%
FY20201$5k100%
FY20193$299k100%
FY20181$25k100%
FY20174$404kn/a
97% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$332kEducation$327kRecreation & Sports$144kCommunity Improvement$123kReligion$30kHealth$28kFood & Nutrition$22kHuman Services$21kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Unity Christian Schools Foundation$292,084189%
Midwest Lumber Museum Inc$255,000227%
River Cities Tennis Association$139,208249%
Gateway Area Foundation$123,217143%
The Family Leader Foundation Inc$35,00020%
Lyons District Foundation$30,0001n/a
Crossview Church$29,7533n/a
Mercy Health Care Foundation$25,000114%
Clinton Area Showboat Theatre Inc$25,00016%
Sleep in Heavenly Peace Inc$15,25020%
Show all 15 grantees
All grantees of Edith Curtis Armstrong and Florence E Curtis Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Unity Christian Schools Foundation$292,084189%
Midwest Lumber Museum Inc$255,000227%
River Cities Tennis Association$139,208249%
Gateway Area Foundation$123,217143%
The Family Leader Foundation Inc$35,00020%
Lyons District Foundation$30,0001n/a
Crossview Church$29,7533n/a
Mercy Health Care Foundation$25,000114%
Clinton Area Showboat Theatre Inc$25,00016%
Sleep in Heavenly Peace Inc$15,25020%
Clinton Symphony Orchestra Association$10,00019%
Hoover Presidential Foundation$5,00010%
My Gear Outreach$5,00014%
Clinton County Historical Society$5,00019%
Speak Out Against Suicide$3,00012%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 10 recipients with no EIN on record ($50k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Edith Curtis Armstrong and Florence E Curtis Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 4 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 13 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnity Christian Schools Foundation: $292,084 over 1y, 89% of budgetMidwest Lumber Museum Inc: $255,000 over 2y, 27% of budgetRiver Cities Tennis Association: $139,208 over 2y, 49% of budgetGateway Area Foundation: $123,217 over 1y, 43% of budgetThe Family Leader Foundation Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetMercy Health Care Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetClinton Area Showboat Theatre Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetSleep in Heavenly Peace Inc: $15,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetClinton Symphony Orchestra Association: $10,000 over 1y, 9.4% of budgetHoover Presidential Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMy Gear Outreach: $5,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetClinton County Historical Society: $5,000 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetSpeak Out Against Suicide: $3,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 13.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Edward a and Mary W Howes FoundationSC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Edward a and Mary W Howes Foundation · Allison Everett Pearson Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Edith Curtis Armstrong and Florence E Curtis Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Edith Curtis Armstrong and Florence E Curtis Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Edith Curtis Armstrong and Florence E Curtis Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About Edith Curtis Armstrong and Florence E Curtis Foundation

How much does Edith Curtis Armstrong and Florence E Curtis Foundation give?
Edith Curtis Armstrong and Florence E Curtis Foundation reported 11 grants totaling $67,253 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 5 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does Edith Curtis Armstrong and Florence E Curtis Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (32%), Education (31%), Recreation & Sports (14%).
Who are Edith Curtis Armstrong and Florence E Curtis Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Unity Christian Schools Foundation ($292k), Midwest Lumber Museum Inc ($255k), River Cities Tennis Association ($139k).
Does Edith Curtis Armstrong and Florence E Curtis Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 40% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Edith Curtis Armstrong and Florence E Curtis Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Edith Curtis Armstrong and Florence E Curtis Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Edward a and Mary W Howes Foundation, Allison Everett Pearson Foundation, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Edith Curtis Armstrong and Florence E Curtis Foundation based?
Edith Curtis Armstrong and Florence E Curtis Foundation is based in IL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Edith Curtis Armstrong and Florence E Curtis’ filings →

More from the funding graph