· Private foundation
Edd Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $115k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SANHEDRIA | $22,600 |
| KEREN BNEI TORAH | $20,200 |
| MISHNA SDURA | $18,000 |
| SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM | $15,800 |
| Individual grant recipient | $13,704 |
| Individual grant recipient | $13,600 |
| A LIFE OF TORAH | $11,400 |
| A TIME | $6,200 |
| GEMILOS CHASUDIM GEMACH BNEI LEVI | $5,200 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,200 |
| ATERET TORAH | $3,601 |
| MEKOR HAIM CENTER | $3,600 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF OR YOSEF | $52 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
17 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- KBKEREN BNEI TORAH4× · 2021–2024 · $92k · revenue -11%
- IGIndividual grant recipient4× · 2021–2024 · $88k
- AFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SANHEDRIA JERUSALEM INC4× · 2021–2024 · $73k · revenue -49%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $36k
- HIHARMONY IN THE JEWISH HOME INCgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $26k · revenue +83% · 46% of their budget
- YMYAD MORDECHAI INCone grant, 2023 · $18k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Religious Teaching
publish religious books
Ohr Yisrael is a religious institution that provides religious services and instruction to Rabbis and community members.
To raise and distribute funds to support educational programs and institutions in Israel.
Award grants to promote torah study
To help establish and maintain agendas for Hebrew and religious enlightenment
To support and promote the study of torah (bible) among members of jewish faith worldwide.
Religious School
Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.
encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bet Midrash Ohel Torah and the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Kol Yehuda Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds KEREN BNEI TORAH ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SANHEDRIA JERUSALEM INC ↗
- Who funds BARKAI FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HARMONY IN THE JEWISH HOME INC ↗
- Who funds A Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange ↗
- Who funds THE SEPHARDIC HERITAGE MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds TORAH LEARNING RESOURCES LTD ↗
- Who funds Mekor Hayim Center Inc ↗
- Who funds BET MIDRASH OHEL TORAH ↗
- Who funds American Friends of Kol Yehuda Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · Chehebar Family Foundation · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Edd Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Edd Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Edd Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.