Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ed E Maccrone Private Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$233kArts & Culture$178kHealth$64kYouth Development$59kHuman Services$59k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,400
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FDN$8,800
FOUNDERS SOCIETY DIA$4,400
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$4,400
NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART$4,400
STARR COMMONWEALTH$4,400
DETROIT PUBLIC LIBRARY$4,400
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$4,400
LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY$4,400
BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$4,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $59k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $7k → 14%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $7k → 14%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $7k → 14%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $7k → 14%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $7k → 14%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $7k → 14%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $7k → 14%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $7k → 14%STARR COMMONWEALTH: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of Ed E Maccrone Private Fdn’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Ed E Maccrone Private Fdnlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.8% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$592k · 11 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
0

Total granted

$592k
$0

Still filing today

55%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $59k · revenue +5%
  • NG
    National Gallery of Art
    9× · 2017–2025 · $59k · revenue +57%
  • BS
    BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $59k · revenue +38%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field
    05the grantee network

    6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    0
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    6/6
    Grantees still filing
    5/6
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    LAWRENCE UNIVERSITY: $114,052 · OtherLAWRENCE UNIVERSITYDETROIT PUBLIC LIBRARY: $59,226 · OtherDETROIT PUBLIC LIBRARYBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $59,226 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICAFOUNDERS SOCIETY DIA: $32,126 · OtherFOUNDERS SOCIETY DIACHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF: $20,826 · OtherCHILDRENS HOSPITAL OFNational Gallery of Art: $59,226 · Arts & CultureNational Gallery of ArtBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $59,226 · Arts & CultureBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA I…THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $27,100 · Arts & CultureTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF AR…The Trustees of Princeton University: $59,226 · EducationThe Trustee…STARR COMMONWEALTH: $59,226 · Human ServicesSTARR COMMO…CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $42,800 · Health
    Other$285,456Arts & Culture$145,552Education$59,226Human Services$59,226Health$42,800

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $59,226 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNational Gallery of Art: $59,226 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $59,226 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSTARR COMMONWEALTH: $59,226 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION: $42,800 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $27,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
    • Who funds National Gallery of Art ↗
    • Who funds BOSTON SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
    • Who funds STARR COMMONWEALTH ↗
    • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATION ↗
    • Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Ed E Maccrone Private Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ed E Maccrone Private Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
    • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
    • Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc: 0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ed E Maccrone Private Fdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph