Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ed and Nancy Reinhart Hengel Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$248k
Granted FY2022
13
Grants FY2022
4
States reached
$50k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

68% of Ed and Nancy Reinhart Hengel Family Foundation Inc’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Mayo Clinic, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 5 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year Ed and Nancy Reinhart Hengel Family Foundation Inc named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $248k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

7
’17
4
’18
5
’19
7
’20
5
’21
8
’22
4
’23
5
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$1.4MReligion$581kYouth Development$400kHuman Services$310kEducation$275kPublic Safety & Disaster$56kArts & Culture$41kPhilanthropy$9kOther$0
02FY2022 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k7 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $150k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE HOPE FOR FERTILITY FOUNDATION$50,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$50,000
MINNESOTA FIREFIGHTER INITIATIVE$50,000
LA CROSSE AREA FAMILY YMCA$40,000
HEROES HELPING HEROES$25,000
ST CLARE HEALTH MISSION$25,000
ARTIS-NAPLES-LEADERSHIP CIRCLE$2,000
FATHER JOSEPH WALIJEWSKI LEGACY BUI$1,300
LA CROSSE AREA CRIMESTOPPERS$1,000
GREAT RIVERS UNITED WAY$1,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,000
THE EXCHANGE$1,000
LA CROSSE POLICE K-9 FUND$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%MINNESOTA FIREFIGHTER INITIATIVE: $50k → 7%HEROES HELPING HEROES: $25k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 30% of Ed and Nancy Reinhart Hengel Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 87% of the giving stays in WI; by stated purpose, 65%.

Ed and Nancy Reinhart Hengel Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 14 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +36% since the first grant, against -60% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2022, 5 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call). Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
8

Total granted

$1.3M
$227k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
-60%

Still filing today

36%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SHRINE OF OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $400k · revenue +27%
  • LC
    La Crosse Area Family Young Men's Christian Association Inc
    7× · 2017–2023 · $280k · revenue +36%
  • SC
    ST CLARE HEALTH MISSION INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $85k · revenue +212%

Funded once

  • SP
    ST PATRICK PARISH
    one grant, 2017 · $100k
  • AF
    AQUINAS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • CC
    COULEE COUNCIL ON ADDICTIONS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue -69%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
2
Loyola University Medical Center

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.lumc is a member of loyola university health system and trinity…

Health
3
Garrison Memorial Hospital

As an affiliate of commonspirit health, we make the healing presence of god known in our world by improving the health of the people we serve, especially those who are vulnerable, while we advance social justice for all.

Health
4
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
5
Virtua Medical Group Pa

The physicians of virtua medical group (vmg) share a common philosophy in all they do: to create an outstanding experience for patients. in a broad range of specialties, from family medicine to surgery to oncology, vmg's highly-trained…

Health
6
St Luke's Des Peres Episcopal- Presbyterian Hospital

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
7
Covenant Medical Center Inc

We, covenant medical center and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. covenant medical center is a member of trinity health.

Health
8
Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc

The mission of gundersen lutheran medical foundation, inc. is to improve the lives of patients and our larger community through medical education, research, outreach, and the philanthropic support of gundersen health system.

Health
9
The Medical College of Wisconsin Inc

The medical college of wisconsin (mcw) is a distinguished leader and innovator in the education and development of the next generation of physicians, (continued in schedule o)

Education
10
St Lukes Episcopal-Presbyterian Hospitals

We are dedicated to providing exceptional care to every patient, every time.

Health
11
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

—
12
Loyola University Health System

We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.loyola university health system is a member of trinity health.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Great Rivers United Way Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Hope for Fertility Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MILWAUKEE: $1,000,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MILWAUKEEBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $400,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBSHRINE OF OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE INC: $400,000 · OtherSHRINE OF OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE INCLa Crosse Area Family Young Men's Christian Association Inc: $280,000 · OtherLa Crosse Area Family Young Men's Christian Association IncST PATRICK PARISH: $100,000 · Other+16 more: $131,365 · Other+16 moreMAYO CLINIC: $250,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICST CLARE HEALTH MISSION INC: $85,000 · HealthST CLARE HEALTH…THE HOPE FOR FERTILITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 · HealthTHE HOPE FOR FE…COULEE COUNCIL ON ADDICTIONS INC: $25,000 · HealthCOULEE COUNCIL …VITERBO UNIVERSITY: $250,000 · EducationVITERBO U…MINNESOTA FIREFIGHTER INITIATIVE: $50,000 · Human ServicesHEROES HELPING HEROES HEROES HELPING HEROES: $25,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF LA CROSSE INC: $25,000 · Arts & CultureARTIS-NAPLES INC: $15,600 · Arts & CultureGREAT RIVERS UNITED WAY INC: $8,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,311,365Health$435,000Education$250,000Human Services$75,000Arts & Culture$40,600Philanthropy$8,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHRINE OF OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE INC: $400,000 over 4y, 3.4% of budgetLa Crosse Area Family Young Men's Christian Association Inc: $280,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVITERBO UNIVERSITY: $250,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetST CLARE HEALTH MISSION INC: $85,000 over 4y, 5.2% of budgetTHE HOPE FOR FERTILITY FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetMINNESOTA FIREFIGHTER INITIATIVE: $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCOULEE COUNCIL ON ADDICTIONS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHEROES HELPING HEROES HEROES HELPING HEROES: $25,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF LA CROSSE INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetARTIS-NAPLES INC: $15,600 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREAT RIVERS UNITED WAY INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHRINE OF OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE INC ↗
  • Who funds La Crosse Area Family Young Men's Christian Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds VITERBO UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ST CLARE HEALTH MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOPE FOR FERTILITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA FIREFIGHTER INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds COULEE COUNCIL ON ADDICTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEROES HELPING HEROES HEROES HELPING HEROES ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF LA CROSSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTIS-NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT RIVERS UNITED WAY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lyche Family Foundation IncWI17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lyche Family Foundation Inc · La Crosse Community Foundation · John & Kathy Reinhart Family Foundation · Smith Russell & Vera Private Fdn Xxxxxx4172 · Sue Anne Gelatt Foundation · Mayo Clinic Group Return · Otto Bremer Trust · Glendenning Family Foundation Inc · June Onefive Foundation Inc · The Pmg Foundation Inc Agy - Uma 1035017881 · Cleary-Kumm Foundation Inc · Gundersen Lutheran Administrative Services Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ed and Nancy Reinhart Hengel Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ed and Nancy Reinhart Hengel Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ed and Nancy Reinhart Hengel Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Ed and Nancy Reinhart Hengel Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ed and Nancy Reinhart Hengel Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph