Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ed and Mary Schreck Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$275k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$655kInternational$315kEnvironment$165kPhilanthropy$155kHuman Services$90kPublic Safety & Disaster$80kArts & Culture$25k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ERIKA'S LIGHTHOUSE$40,000
MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA$40,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$30,000
NATIONAL MS SOCIETY$30,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$20,000
UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION$20,000
UNICEF USA$20,000
UNITED WAY OF METRO CHICAGO$20,000
OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL$15,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$15,000
MISERICORDIA FAMILY ASSOCIATION$15,000
FRIENDS OF THE CHICAGO RIVER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MISERICORDIA FAMILY ASSOCIATION: $15k → 14%MISERICORDIA FAMILY ASSOCIATION: $15k → 14%MISERICORDIA FAMILY ASSOCIATION: $15k → 14%MISERICORDIA FAMILY ASSOCIATION: $15k → 14%MISERICORDIA FAMILY ASSOCIATION: $15k → 14%MISERICORDIA FAMILY ASSOCIATION: $15k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 12 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +46% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
2

Total granted

$1.4M
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+32%

Still filing today

83%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthPhilanthropyEnvironmentHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $220k · revenue +50%
  • EL
    Erikas Lighthouse A Beacon of Hope for Adolescent Depression
    6× · 2020–2025 · $165k · revenue +420%
  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
    6× · 2020–2025 · $150k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • TA
    THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGOgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +32%
  • AC
    AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
2
University of Illinois Foundation

The Foundation, a 501(c)(3) charitable organization, is an independent and separate nonprofit entity from the University of Illinois. Our mission is to encourage and administer private gifts and serve the UI System by working closely with…

Education
3
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

—
4
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
5
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
6
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
7
International Federation of Accountants

Ifac acts in the public interest and has no profit-making purpose. ifac serves the public interest by: speaking out and engaging as the voice for the global profession; leading and developing a future-ready accountancy profession; and…

Education
8
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
9
UChicago Research International

To engage in scientific research and educational activities throughout the world on behalf of and in conjunction with the university of chicago.

Health
10
Unicef Usa Impact Fund for Children Inc

The unicef usa impact fund for children exists to develop and implement financial solutions to ensure every child is healthy, educated, protected, and respected. we believe truly scalable, long-term impact will only be accomplished when we…

Philanthropy
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc; the most unlike its peers is Erikas Lighthouse a Beacon of Hope for Adolescent Depression. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $220,000 · OtherMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INCNATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $180,000 · OtherNATIONAL MS SOCIETYAMERICAN RED CROSS: $80,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSS+1 more: $15,000 · OtherUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 · InternationalUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATIO…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $120,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR U…OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $75,000 · InternationalOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONA…Erikas Lighthouse A Beacon of Hope for Adolescent Depression: $165,000 · HealthErikas Lighthouse …AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $75,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SO…UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $155,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY …ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $150,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENT…MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $90,000 · Human ServicesTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $25,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE CHICAGO RIVER: $15,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$495,000International$315,000Health$240,000Philanthropy$155,000Environment$150,000Human Services$90,000Education$25,000Arts & Culture$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC: $220,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetErikas Lighthouse A Beacon of Hope for Adolescent Depression: $165,000 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC: $155,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $150,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $120,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $120,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $90,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetOPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US: $75,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHICAGO RIVER: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MENTAL HEALTH AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds Erikas Lighthouse A Beacon of Hope for Adolescent Depression ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF METROPOLITAN CHICAGO INC ↗
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL INC D/B/A OPPORTUNITY INTERNATIONAL-US ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHICAGO RIVER ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ed and Mary Schreck Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ed and Mary Schreck Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ed and Mary Schreck’s filings →

    More from the funding graph