Skip to content

· Private foundation

Ebling Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$515k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$1.3MCommunity Improvement$1.1MPhilanthropy$816kEducation$213kYouth Development$175kHuman Services$147kScience & Tech$60kArts & Culture$55kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $180k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREENLIGHT FUND$250,000
THE BOSTON FOUNDATION$180,000
MORE THAN WORDS$25,000
THE CHILDRENS ROOM$20,000
THE FAMILY VAN$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
COMMUNITIES FOR RESTORATIVE JUSTICE$5,000
ELLIS EARLY LERNING FUND$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $147k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%THE CHILDRENS ROOM: $40k → 8%THE CHILDRENS ROOM: $20k → 8%THE CHILDRENS ROOM: $20k → 8%THE CHILDRENS ROOM: $17k → 8%THE CHILDRENS ROOM: $10k → 8%THE CHILDRENS ROOM: $10k → 8%THE CHILDRENS ROOM: $10k → 8%THE CHILDRENS ROOM: $10k → 8%THE CHILDRENS ROOM: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.9M · 9 repeat orgs$155k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +100% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$2.9M
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+100%
+18%

Still filing today

67%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCommunity ImprovementHuman ServicesArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GF
    GREENLIGHT FUND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +215%
  • MORE THAN WORDS INC
    6× · 2018–2025 · $175k · revenue +82%
  • TC
    The Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children
    9× · 2017–2025 · $147k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • BB
    BRIDGE BOSTON FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $75k · revenue -60%
  • AH
    ARMENIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • FH
    FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +18%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
3
New England Lawboston

New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…

Education
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
The History Co-Lab Inc

Creating impactful learning for all learners in support of youth thriving

Education
6
Cfa Society Boston Inc

Cfa society boston members promote the highest ethical standards, best practices and professional development within the investment industry to educate and build trust in the community it serves.

—
7
Breakthrough Greater Boston Inc

To inspire excitement for learning, create paths to and through college, and promote careers in education.

Education
8
Activate Global Inc

Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…

Environment
9
The Bridgespan Group Inc

Bridgespan's mission is to build a better world by strengthening the ability of mission-driven organizations and philanthropists to achieve breakthrough results in addressing society's most important challenges and opportunities.

Community Improvement
10
Massachusetts Education & Career Opportunities Inc

Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…

Education
11
Wheaton College

Wheaton college provides a transformative liberal arts education, combining theory and practice, for intellectually curious students within a collaborative and vibrant extended community and network that values and strives to create an…

Education
12
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Facing History & Ourselves Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

IDE: $1,100,000 · OtherIDEMORE THAN WORDS INC: $175,000 · OtherMORE THAN WORDS INCGIVE DUET INC: $70,000 · OtherALRAY TAYLOR 2ND CHANCE: $60,000 · OtherARMENIAN HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Other+3 more: $15,005 · OtherGREENLIGHT FUND INC: $1,113,000 · Community ImprovementGREENLIGHT FUND INCTRICKLE UP PROGRAM INC: $165,000 · Community ImprovementTRICKLE UP PROGRAM INCBoston Foundation Inc: $811,000 · PhilanthropyBoston Foundation IncBRIDGE BOSTON FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $60,000 · EducationTHE EPIPHANY SCHOOL INC: $40,000 · EducationSCIENCE FROM SCIENTISTS INC: $37,500 · EducationThe Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children: $147,000 · Human ServicesFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $5,000 · Arts & CultureCOMMUNITIES FOR RESTORATIVE JUSTICE INC: $5,000 · Crime & LegalTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$1,470,005Community Improvement$1,278,000Philanthropy$811,000Education$212,500Human Services$147,000Arts & Culture$5,000Crime & Legal$5,000Public Safety & Disaster$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREENLIGHT FUND INC: $1,113,000 over 9y, 1.5% of budgetBoston Foundation Inc: $811,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMORE THAN WORDS INC: $175,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetTRICKLE UP PROGRAM INC: $165,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetThe Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children: $147,000 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetBRIDGE BOSTON FOUNDATION INC: $75,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE EPIPHANY SCHOOL INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSCIENCE FROM SCIENTISTS INC: $37,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREENLIGHT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Boston Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MORE THAN WORDS INC ↗
  • Who funds TRICKLE UP PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds The Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE BOSTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds THE EPIPHANY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds SCIENCE FROM SCIENTISTS INC ↗
  • Who funds FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES FOR RESTORATIVE JUSTICE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN INDIA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Ebling Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Ebling Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • More Than Words Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Communities for Restorative Justice Inc: 8% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • The Epiphany School Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Boston Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ebling Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ebling Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ebling Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph