Skip to content
Eberly Da & Tb Scholarship Ta at a glance

· Private foundation

Eberly Da & Tb Scholarship Ta

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$71k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$361kRecreation & Sports$12kArts & Culture$3kScience & Tech$3k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $59k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$4,475
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KENT STATE UNIVERSITY$11,975
UNIVERSITY OF AKRON$8,950
KENT STATE UNIVERSITY STARK CAMPUS$6,975
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO$4,475
CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY$4,475
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI$4,475
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY$4,475
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH$2,500
AULTMAN COLLEGE$2,500
PURDUE UNIVERSITY$2,500
JOHN CARROLL UNIVERSITY$2,500
WALSH UNIVERSITY$2,500
MARIETTA COLLEGE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 90% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $3k → 11%PURDUE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 13%THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 6%CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY: $4k → 9%TIFFIN UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 12%THE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON: $12k → 13%AULTMAN COLLEGE: $3k → 13%MARIETTA COLLEGE: $3k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $4k → 16%JOHN CARROLL UNIVERSITY: $3k → 17%THE UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO: $4k → 18%OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $5k → 19%OHIO UNIVERSITY: $8k → 22%BOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $3k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF AKRON: $9k → 13%KENT STATE UNIVERSITY STARK CAMPUS: $7k → 13%UNIVERSITY AKRON: $8k → 13%STARK STATE COLLEGE: $4k → 13%WALSH UNIVERSITY: $3k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
WV
VA
TN
NC
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$275k · 18 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
20

Total granted

$275k
$78k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+21%

Still filing today

39%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    University of Mount Union
    2× · 2020–2024 · $12k · revenue +36%
  • TU
    Tiffin University
    3× · 2020–2024 · $9k · revenue +31%
  • MU
    MALONE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2021–2024 · $9k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • JC
    JAMESTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    one grant, 2023 · $9k
  • WS
    WINSTONSALEM STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $9k
  • The Ohio University Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +42%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
4
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
5
Otterbein University

Otterbein University is an inclusive community dedicated to educating the whole person in the context of humane values. Our mission is to prepare graduates to think deeply and broadly, to engage locally and globally, and to advance their…

Education
6
Delaware Valley University

See schedule o.we are inspired by the ideals of our founder who, in 1896, emphasized respect for all people and ideas, who honored knowledge with practice, progress and the common good. our historical commitment to experiential learning…

—
7
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
8
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
9
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
10
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
11
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
12
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Capital University; the most unlike its peers is Central State University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/26
Grantees still filing
21/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY: $55,750 · OtherKENT STATE UNIVERSITYOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY: $30,900 · OtherOHIO STATE UNIVERSITYTHE UNIVERSITY OF AKRON: $29,364 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF AKRONMIAMI UNIVERSITY: $21,389 · OtherMIAMI UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI: $18,725 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATIOHIO UNIVERSITY: $16,939 · OtherOHIO UNIVERSITYWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY: $14,150 · OtherKENT STATE UNIVERSITY STARK CAMPUS: $11,975 · OtherBOWLING GREEN STATE UNIVERSITY: $11,389 · OtherJAMESTOWN COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $9,250 · OtherWINSTONSALEM STATE UNIVERSITY: $9,250 · Other+9 more: $39,914 · Other+9 moreUniversity of Mount Union: $11,639 · EducationUniversity of Mount UnionTiffin University: $9,139 · EducationTiffin UniversityMALONE UNIVERSITY: $8,789 · EducationMALONE UNIVERSITYThe Ohio University Foundation: $8,250 · EducationThe Ohio University FoundationCAPITAL UNIVERSITY: $6,389 · EducationCAPITAL UNIVERSITYTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $5,250 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $5,000 · EducationMarietta College: $4,900 · EducationVanderbilt University: $4,475 · EducationCENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY: $4,475 · Education+16 more: $40,750 · Education+16 more
Other$268,995Education$109,056

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Mount Union: $11,639 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTiffin University: $9,139 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMALONE UNIVERSITY: $8,789 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Ohio University Foundation: $8,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAPITAL UNIVERSITY: $6,389 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER: $5,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMarietta College: $4,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University: $4,475 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBelmont University: $3,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC: $2,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASHLAND UNIVERSITY: $2,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHIO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJohn Carroll University: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWalsh University Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSETON HILL UNIVERSITY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCedarville University: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Findlay: $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University: $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTrine University: $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $2,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Mount Union ↗
  • Who funds Tiffin University ↗
  • Who funds MALONE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The Ohio University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE COLLEGE OF WOOSTER ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds Marietta College ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL STATE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Belmont University ↗
  • Who funds BERKLEE COLLEGE OF MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds ASHLAND UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds OHIO CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds John Carroll University ↗
  • Who funds Walsh University Inc ↗
  • Who funds SETON HILL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF WITTENBERG COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds Cedarville University ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Bernard-Wentz Scholar…The Paul and Carol Da…Columbus FoundationAmerican Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Bernard-Wentz Scholarship FundOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Bernard-Wentz Scholarship Fund · The Paul and Carol David Foundation · Columbus Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eberly Da & Tb Scholarship Ta funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eberly Da & Tb Scholarship Ta. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 5% of income from government
  • Berklee College of Music Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eberly Da & Tb Scholarship Ta’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home