How much did EASTSIDE RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION grant in FY2024?

EASTSIDE RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION reported 12 grants totaling $1,243,672 in its FY2024 IRS filing.

Where is EASTSIDE RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION based?

EASTSIDE RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION is based in WA.

EASTSIDE RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION

Foundation Dossiers Also receives grants — funding profile →

· Public charity

EASTSIDE RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION

Emerald heights is a life plan retirement community.

$1.2M

Granted FY2024

Grants

Communities

$1.0M

Largest

01What you fund

0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2018–2024.

Human Services$14MHealth$130kHousing & Shelter$80kFood & Nutrition$25kPhilanthropy$10kEducation$10kOther$418k

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

—

2019

king librarylibrary systemwayredmondlivestrainingpre-hospital emergency

2020

loveneighborslivestrainingresearchkingfood

2021

—

2022

—

2023

—

2024

end homelessnesscarejourney

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

$10k–50k11 grants · $200k
$250k+1 grant · $1.0M

$20,000

Median grant

States reached

$368M

Total assets

Largest grants

EMERALD COMMUNITIES$1,043,672
MEDIC ONE FOUNDATION$40,000
CONGREGATIONS FOR THE HOMELESS$25,000
THE SOPHIA WAY$25,000
VINE MAPLE PLACE$20,000
NORTHWEST PARKINSONS FOUNDATION$20,000
SOUND GENERATIONS$20,000
EASTSIDE FRIENDS OF SENIORS$10,000
THE EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE HOLY CROSS$10,000
OLD FRIENDS CLUB$10,000
PRIDE ACROSS THE BRIDGE$10,000
NORTHWEST LGBT SENIOR CARE$10,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $14.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9% — the area typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$14M · 6 repeat orgs$560k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +148% since the first grant, against +68% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$14M

$470k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+148%

+68%

Still filing today

100%

54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthEducationHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

EC
EMERALD COMMUNITIES
4× · 2021–2024 · $14M · revenue +148% · 71% of their budget
EH
EVERGREEN HEALTH FOUNDATION
2× · 2019–2020 · $175k · revenue +236%
MO
MEDIC ONE FOUNDATION
3× · 2019–2024 · $100k · revenue +46%

Funded once

CO
CITY OF REDMOND WASHINGTON
one grant, 2023 · $100k
UO
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH CENTER
one grant, 2020 · $80k
HF
HABITAT FOR HUMANITYgraduated
one grant, 2018 · $75k · revenue +577%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Nourish Pierce County

To provide food to individuals in need with compassion, dignity and respect. No one needing assistance is turned away.

—

Friends of Seattle Waterfront

To support, through outreach, fundraising and stewardship, the City's Waterfront Seattle project: Creation of a park along the central shoreline to benefit the public

Community Improvement

Skagit Gleaners

Food recovery for low income families over 600 families served

—

Port Angeles Food Bank

Nourishing our community. the port angeles food bank is the main food bank in clallam county, providing food to 13 other area pantries and meal programs as well as providing food to over 5,000 individuals per month.

Food & Nutrition

Olympic Peninsula Community Clinic

Volunteer Health Care Services

Health

North Olympic Healthcare Network

To provide patient-centered, quality-driven, whole-person healthcare services, accessible to everyone in our community.

Health

King County Sexual Assault Resource

Non-profit organization providing sexual assault related services for people of King County.

—

Senior Life Resources Northwest

To preserve and enhance the quality of life at home, with dignity and care.

Human Services

Lutheran Community Services Northwest

LCSNW serves individuals, families and communities for health, justice and hope.

Human Services

Emergency Medical Services at the University of Washington

Health

Eastside Retirement Association

Emerald heights is a life plan retirement community.

Human Services

House Our Neighbors

House Our Neighbors envisions a future where all people can afford to live and thrive in vibrant, cohesive, and climate resilient communities. To achieve this, we develop, advocate, and mobilize for policy to realize social housing for the…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Philanthropy Northwest and the most unlike its peers is Pride Across the Bridge. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

18/18

Grantees still filing

13/18

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Human Services$14,038,053Other$417,500Health$130,000Housing & Shelter$80,000Food & Nutrition$25,000Philanthropy$10,000Education$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Puget Sound Energy FoundationDE31.8× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Puget Sound Energy Foundation · Seattle Foundation · The Norcliffe Foundation · United Way of King County · Kawabe Memorial Fund · Glassybaby White Light Fund · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Biella Foundation · Wilkins Charitable Foundation · Harvest Foundation · Moccasin Lake Foundation · Lucky Seven Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation EASTSIDE RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: EMERALD COMMUNITIES.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~35 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 8 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.5× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 204381745 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on EMERALD COMMUNITIES, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 35 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 71% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Eastside Retirement Association?

Find your warmest path to Eastside Retirement Association through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

EASTSIDE RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Eastside Retirement Association?

More from the funding graph

EASTSIDE RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Eastside Retirement Association?

More from the funding graph