Skip to content
Eastern Pennsylvania Youth Soccer Assoc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Eastern Pennsylvania Youth Soccer Assoc

For more than 50 years, eastern pennsylvania youth soccer has worked throughout eastern pennsylvania to promote, foster and perpetuate the game of soccer to the region's youth.

$174k
Granted FY2019
2
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Recreation & Sports$102k
02FY2019 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $10,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $174,009 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $164,009 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NAZARETH SOCCER CLUB$5,000
KING OF PRUSSIA SOCCER CLUB$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 75% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PHOENIXVILLE AREA SOCCER CLUB: $5k → 6%VEREINIGUNG ERZGEBIRGE SOCCER: $10k → 6%KING OF PRUSSIA SOCCER CLUB: $5k → 7%KEYSTONE FC: $5k → 8%FUSION FC: $9k → 9%RIDLEY UNITED SOCCER CLUB: $13k → 10%NAZARETH SOCCER CLUB: $5k → 11%WILSON JUNIOR SOCCER CLUB: $3k → 11%ALLENTOWN YOUTH SOCCER CLUB: $5k → 11%POTTSVILLE YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $10k → 12%TOWANDA AREA YOUTH SOCCER: $10k → 12%MIFFLIN COUNTY SOCCER CLUB: $11k → 15%MINERSVILLE AREA YOUTH SOCCER CLUB: $8k → 12%WEST SCHUYLKILL FUTBOL CLUB: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fc York

Youth soccer club

—
2
North Shore United Soccer Club Inc

Recreation Youth Soccer

Recreation & Sports
3
International Soccer Club
Recreation & Sports
4
Sporting Wichita Inc

The mission of Sporting Wichita is to provide a positive safe and professional environment which encourages early development and fosters a lifelong interest in soccer We seek to provide consistent quality programming structure education…

Recreation & Sports
5
Roanoke Valley Youth Soccer Club Inc

We aim to develop quality soccer players, as well as well-balanced, motivated individuals who are prepared to handle life's challenges. Our programs are designed to enhance each player's personal growth.

Recreation & Sports
6
Washington Soccer Club

Washington Soccer, Inc. PO Box 1124 Washington, Pennsylvania 15301

Recreation & Sports
7
Wauconda Area Youth Soccer Club

Provide recreational soccer for children 3-14

Recreation & Sports
8
Lawrenceburg Greendale Soccer Club

Soccer programming for youth in the cities of Lawrenceburg, IN and Greendale IN.

Recreation & Sports
9
Cold Spring Area Soccer Club
—
10
Punxsutawney Soccer Association Inc

Social org/club soccer for the youth in punxsutawney.

Recreation & Sports
11
West Central Soccer Association

Childrens Recreational Sports Association

Recreation & Sports
12
Sugar City Soccer League
Recreation & Sports
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is King of Prussia Soccer Club; the most unlike its peers is Ridley United Soccer Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TOWANDA AREA YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC: $10,000 · OtherTOWANDA AREA YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION INCELICABETH MCGILL DROPIN CENTER: $10,000 · OtherELICABETH MCGILL DROPIN CENTERPOTTSVILLE YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · OtherPOTTSVILLE YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATIONFUSION FC INC: $8,506 · OtherFUSION FC INCMINERSVILLE AREA YOUTH SOCCER CLUB INC: $7,500 · OtherMINERSVILLE AREA YOUTH SOCCER CLUB INCALLENTOWN YOUTH SOCCER CLUB: $5,000 · OtherALLENTOWN YOUTH SOCCER CLUBWEST SCHUYLKILL FUTBOL CLUB: $5,000 · OtherWEST SCHUYLKILL FUTBOL CLUBRIDLEY UNITED SOCCER CLUB: $12,500 · Recreation & SportsRIDLEY UNITED SOCCER CLUBMIFFLIN COUNTY SOCCER CLUB: $11,000 · Recreation & SportsMIFFLIN COUNTY SOCCER CLUBPHOENIXVILLE AREA SOCCER CLUB INC: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsPHOENIXVILLE AREA SOCCER CLUB INCNAZARETH SOCCER CLUB: $5,000 · Recreation & SportsNAZARETH SOCCER CLUBWILSON JUNIOR SOCCER CLUB: $2,500 · Recreation & SportsWILSON JUNIOR SOCCER CLUBKEYSTONE SPORTS & ENRICHMENT GROUP: $5,200 · Youth DevelopmentKEYSTONE SP…KING OF PRUSSIA SOCCER CLUB: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentKING OF PRU…
Other$56,006Recreation & Sports$36,000Youth Development$10,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRIDLEY UNITED SOCCER CLUB: $12,500 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetPOTTSVILLE YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $10,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetFUSION FC INC: $8,506 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetKEYSTONE SPORTS & ENRICHMENT GROUP: $5,200 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetPHOENIXVILLE AREA SOCCER CLUB INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNAZARETH SOCCER CLUB: $5,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetWILSON JUNIOR SOCCER CLUB: $2,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eastern Pennsylvania Youth Soccer Assoc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eastern Pennsylvania Youth Soccer Assoc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $91k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2019, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eastern Pennsylvania Youth Soccer Assoc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home