Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Eastern Pennsylvania Youth Soccer Assoc

For more than 50 years, eastern pennsylvania youth soccer has worked throughout eastern pennsylvania to promote, foster and perpetuate the game of soccer to the region's youth.

$174k
Granted FY2019
2
Grants FY2019
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172019.

Recreation & Sports$102k
02FY2019 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $10,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $174,009 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $164,009 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KING OF PRUSSIA SOCCER CLUB$5,000
NAZARETH SOCCER CLUB$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 75% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%PHOENIXVILLE AREA SOCCER CLUB: $5k → 6%VEREINIGUNG ERZGEBIRGE SOCCER: $10k → 6%KING OF PRUSSIA SOCCER CLUB: $5k → 7%KEYSTONE FC: $5k → 8%FUSION FC: $9k → 9%RIDLEY UNITED SOCCER CLUB: $13k → 10%NAZARETH SOCCER CLUB: $5k → 11%WILSON JUNIOR SOCCER CLUB: $3k → 11%ALLENTOWN YOUTH SOCCER CLUB: $5k → 11%POTTSVILLE YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION: $10k → 12%TOWANDA AREA YOUTH SOCCER: $10k → 12%MIFFLIN COUNTY SOCCER CLUB: $11k → 15%MINERSVILLE AREA YOUTH SOCCER CLUB: $8k → 12%WEST SCHUYLKILL FUTBOL CLUB: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fc York

Youth soccer club

2
North Shore United Soccer Club Inc

Recreation Youth Soccer

Recreation & Sports
3
International Soccer Club
Recreation & Sports
4
Sporting Wichita Inc

The mission of Sporting Wichita is to provide a positive safe and professional environment which encourages early development and fosters a lifelong interest in soccer We seek to provide consistent quality programming structure education…

Recreation & Sports
5
Roanoke Valley Youth Soccer Club Inc

We aim to develop quality soccer players, as well as well-balanced, motivated individuals who are prepared to handle life's challenges. Our programs are designed to enhance each player's personal growth.

Recreation & Sports
6
Washington Soccer Club

Washington Soccer, Inc. PO Box 1124 Washington, Pennsylvania 15301

Recreation & Sports
7
Wauconda Area Youth Soccer Club

Provide recreational soccer for children 3-14

Recreation & Sports
8
Lawrenceburg Greendale Soccer Club

Soccer programming for youth in the cities of Lawrenceburg, IN and Greendale IN.

Recreation & Sports
9
Cold Spring Area Soccer Club
10
Punxsutawney Soccer Association Inc

Social org/club soccer for the youth in punxsutawney.

Recreation & Sports
11
West Central Soccer Association

Childrens Recreational Sports Association

Recreation & Sports
12
Sugar City Soccer League
Recreation & Sports

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is King of Prussia Soccer Club and the most unlike its peers is Ridley United Soccer Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TOWANDA AREA YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION INC — $10,000 · OtherTOWANDA AREA YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION INCELICABETH MCGILL DROPIN CENTER — $10,000 · OtherELICABETH MCGILL DROPIN CENTERPOTTSVILLE YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · OtherPOTTSVILLE YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATIONFUSION FC INC — $8,506 · OtherFUSION FC INCMINERSVILLE AREA YOUTH SOCCER CLUB INC — $7,500 · OtherMINERSVILLE AREA YOUTH SOCCER CLUB INCWEST SCHUYLKILL FUTBOL CLUB — $5,000 · OtherWEST SCHUYLKILL FUTBOL CLUBALLENTOWN YOUTH SOCCER CLUB — $5,000 · OtherALLENTOWN YOUTH SOCCER CLUBRIDLEY UNITED SOCCER CLUB — $12,500 · Recreation & SportsRIDLEY UNITED SOCCER CLUBMIFFLIN COUNTY SOCCER CLUB — $11,000 · Recreation & SportsMIFFLIN COUNTY SOCCER CLUBNAZARETH SOCCER CLUB — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsNAZARETH SOCCER CLUBPHOENIXVILLE AREA SOCCER CLUB INC — $5,000 · Recreation & SportsPHOENIXVILLE AREA SOCCER CLUB INCWILSON JUNIOR SOCCER CLUB — $2,500 · Recreation & SportsWILSON JUNIOR SOCCER CLUBKEYSTONE SPORTS & ENRICHMENT GROUP — $5,200 · Youth DevelopmentKEYSTONE SP…KING OF PRUSSIA SOCCER CLUB — $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentKING OF PRU…
Other$56,006Recreation & Sports$36,000Youth Development$10,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetRIDLEY UNITED SOCCER CLUB — $12,500 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetPOTTSVILLE YOUTH SOCCER ASSOCIATION — $10,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetFUSION FC INC — $8,506 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetKEYSTONE SPORTS & ENRICHMENT GROUP — $5,200 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNAZARETH SOCCER CLUB — $5,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetPHOENIXVILLE AREA SOCCER CLUB INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWILSON JUNIOR SOCCER CLUB — $2,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.3× affinity7 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Eastern Pennsylvania Youth Soccer Assoc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $91k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2019, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph