Skip to content
Eastern Market Corporation at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Eastern Market Corporation

Eastern market is organized to combat community deterioration and to lessen the burdens of government in managing its public market that has served detroit since 1891.

$439k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$203k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$2.4MFood & Nutrition$467kRecreation & Sports$288kHealth$14k
02FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $288,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $439,253 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $151,253 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$203,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$14M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
1XRUN LLC$203,000
48207-11 GRASSROOT DETROITERS$85,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%5 MILE BREWING COMPANY LLC: $9k → 14%DETROIT FOOD ACADEMY: $60k → 21%GRANDMONT ROSEDALE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $5k → 21%KEEP GROWING DETROIT: $38k → 21%CHASS CENTER: $14k → 21%EASTERN MARKET DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $848k → 21%EASTERN MARKET DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $543k → 21%EASTERN MARKET DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $442k → 21%EASTERN MARKET DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $376k → 21%MICHIGAN FARM TO FREEZER: $369k → 21%1XRUN LLC: $203k → 21%EASTERN MARKET DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $158k → 21%48207-11 GRASSROOT DETROITERS: $85k → 21%RUSSELL ST DELI: $13k → 21%GENESIS HOPE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $8k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
5/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EASTERN MARKET DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $2,367,067 · Community ImprovementEASTERN MARKET DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION+2 more: $46,148 · Community ImprovementMICHIGAN FARM TO FREEZER: $369,160 · OtherMICHIGAN FARM TO FREEZER1XRUN LLC: $203,000 · Other1XRUN LLC48207-11 GRASSROOT DETROITERS: $85,000 · Other48207-11 GRASSROOT DETRO…+2 more: $21,176 · OtherDETROIT FOOD & ENTREPRENEURSHIP ACADEMY: $60,000 · EducationCOMMUNITY HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES CENTER INC & AFFILIATE: $14,080 · HealthGRANDMONT ROSEDALE DEVELOPMENT CORP: $5,421 · Housing & Shelter
Community Improvement$2,413,215Other$678,336Education$60,000Health$14,080Housing & Shelter$5,421

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEASTERN MARKET DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $2,367,067 over 5y, 100% of budgetDETROIT FOOD & ENTREPRENEURSHIP ACADEMY: $60,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetKEEP GROWING DETROIT: $38,148 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES CENTER INC & AFFILIATE: $14,080 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGENESIS HARBOR OF OPPORTUNITIES PROMOTING EXCELLENCE: $8,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Michigan Health Endow…United Way for Southe…The Kresge FoundationCommunity Foundation …Amazonsmile Foundation
Michigan Health Endowment FundMI15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Michigan Health Endowment Fund · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · The Kresge Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eastern Market Corporation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eastern Market Corporation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eastern Market’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home