Skip to content
Earth Day Oregon at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Private foundation

Earth Day Oregon

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$500
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$500
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Environment$27kFood & Nutrition$4kRecreation & Sports$3kEducation$2kYouth Development$2kAnimals$1kArts & Culture$500Crime & Legal$250Other$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
1
States reached
$4k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASCADIANOW (DBA CASCADIA STACK)$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 58% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ADVENTURES WITHOUT LIMITS: $500 → 8%ADVENTURES WITHOUT LIMITS: $500 → 8%FARMERS ENDING HUNGER: $500 → 14%HOME LIFE INC: $125 → 18%GREEN LENTS: $500 → 12%GROWING GARDENS: $250 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$18k · 18 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
56

Total granted

$18k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
0%

Still filing today

83%
95%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
EnvironmentHuman ServicesAnimalsYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UMPQUA WATERSHEDS
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1k · revenue +9%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF GATEWAY GREEN
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1k · revenue +777%
  • SJ
    ST JOHNS SWAPNPLAY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • CP
    Cascade Pacific RC&D Area
    one grant, 2024 · $500 · revenue -6%
  • F
    FOODWAVES
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue +17%
  • PR
    PACIFIC RIVERS
    one grant, 2024 · $500 · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Earth Day Oregon
—
2
Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council

The Coast Fork Willamette Watershed Council is a local nonprofit organization that strives to enhance and restore habitat for fish and wildlife our community and for future generations. Our Board of Directors consists of seven members with…

Environment
3
Oregon Websites and Watershed Project Inc

Develop educational network to communicate historical and scientific information empasizing natural and cultural resources to pacific northwest.

Environment
4
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment
5
Cascadia Wildlands

Cascadia wildlands defends and restores cacasia's wild ecosystems in the forests,in the courts, and in the streets. we envision vast old-growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, a stable climate, and…

Environment
6
Greater Oregon City Watershed Council

To conserve, enhance and protect the quality and ecological integrity of the watersheds by providing a cooperative forum to promote and facilitate integrated watershed management.

Environment
7
The Wetlands Conservancy Inc

Founded in 1981, the wetlands conservancy is dedicated to working in partnership with communities statewide to permanently protect, conserve and restore oregon's greatest wetlands.

Environment
8
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
9
Oregon Energy Systems Technology and Research
Environment
10
Northwest Environmental Advocates

Work through advocacy and education to use federal environmental laws such as the Clean Water Act to protect and restore water quality and habit in the Pacific Northwest and nationwide.

Environment
11
Northwest Environmental Defense Center

Nedc's mission is to work toward a future in which the pacific northwest leads the nation in developing, implementing & enforcing strong laws and regulations that protect the environment & human health, and where our governments &…

—
12
Center for Sustainable Economy

Promoting economic sustainability

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is 1000 Friends of Oregon; the most unlike its peers is Foodwaves. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

69 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 69 of the 74 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
68/69
Grantees still filing
37/69
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UMPQUA WATERSHEDS: $1,000 · EnvironmentUMPQUA WATERSHEDSECOLOGY IN CLASSROOMS AND OUTDOORS: $1,000 · EnvironmentECOLOGY IN CLASSROOMS AND OUTDOORSECO-SCHOOL NETWORK: $1,000 · EnvironmentECO-SCHOOL NETWORKWILLAMETTE RESOURCES AND EDUCATIONAL NETWORK: $1,000 · EnvironmentWILLAMETTE RESOURCES AND EDUCATIONAL NETWORKTualatin Riverkeepers Inc: $1,000 · EnvironmentTualatin Riverkeepers IncPOLLINATOR PROJECT ROGUE VALLEY: $1,000 · EnvironmentPOLLINATOR PROJECT ROGUE VALLEY+29 more: $10,625 · Environment+29 moreCASCADIANOW (DBA CASCADIA STACK): $1,000 · OtherCASCADIANOW (DBA CASCADIA STACK)FRIENDS OF FALL CREEK WATERSHED INC: $1,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF FALL CREEK WATERSHED INCCONSCIOUS GROWTH: $1,000 · OtherCONSCIOUS GROWTHPORTLAND FRUIT TREE PROJECT: $1,000 · OtherPORTLAND FRUIT TREE PROJECTEARTHBOUND JOURNAL: $500 · OtherTHE STREET TRUST COMMUNITY FUND: $500 · OtherKLAMATH LAKE LAND TRUST: $500 · OtherNECANICUM WATERSHED COUNCIL: $500 · OtherNORTHWEST EARTH INSTITUTE: $500 · OtherFRIENDS OF CASCADE-SISKIYOU NATIONAL MONUMENT: $500 · OtherORCAN (OREGON CLIMATE & AGRICULTURE NETWORK): $500 · OtherFRIENDS OF GATEWAY GREEN: $1,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF GATEWAY GREENNorthwest Trail Alliance Inc: $500 · OtherLLOYD ECODISTRICT: $1,000 · OtherLLOYD ECODISTRICTCascade Pacific RC&D Area: $500 · Other350 DESCHUTES 350Deschutes: $1,000 · Other350 DESCHUTES 350DeschutesCOLUMBIA INSIGHT: $500 · Other+4 more: $1,000 · Other+4 moreADVENTURES WITHOUT LIMITS: $1,000 · Human ServicesFARMERS ENDING HUNGER: $500 · Human ServicesGREEN LENTS: $500 · Human ServicesGrowing Gardens: $250 · Human ServicesHOME LIFE INC: $125 · Human ServicesST JOHNS SWAPNPLAY: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentCamp Fire Central Oregon: $500 · Youth DevelopmentURBAN NATURE PARTNERS PDX: $500 · Youth DevelopmentGROW PORTLAND: $1,000 · Food & NutritionFOODWAVES: $500 · Food & NutritionKINDNESS FARM: $500 · Food & NutritionWind & Oar Boat School: $1,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF OUTDOOR SCHOOL: $1,000 · EducationNative Fish Society Inc: $500 · AnimalsWILDLIFE CENTER OF THE NORTH COAST: $500 · AnimalsThink Wild: $500 · AnimalsCASCADES RAPTOR CENTER: $250 · AnimalsWILD SALMON CENTER: $125 · Animals
Environment$16,625Other$13,000Human Services$2,375Youth Development$2,000Food & Nutrition$2,000Education$2,000Animals$1,875

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUMPQUA WATERSHEDS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF GATEWAY GREEN: $1,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetST JOHNS SWAPNPLAY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGROW PORTLAND: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetECOLOGY IN CLASSROOMS AND OUTDOORS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWind & Oar Boat School: $1,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPORTLAND FRUIT TREE PROJECT: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetADVENTURES WITHOUT LIMITS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetECO-SCHOOL NETWORK: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetWILLAMETTE RESOURCES AND EDUCATIONAL NETWORK: $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTualatin Riverkeepers Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget350 DESCHUTES 350Deschutes: $1,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetLLOYD ECODISTRICT: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF OUTDOOR SCHOOL: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetPOLLINATOR PROJECT ROGUE VALLEY: $1,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCascade Pacific RC&D Area: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOODWAVES: $500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPACIFIC RIVERS: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE STREET TRUST COMMUNITY FUND: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFARMERS ENDING HUNGER: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget350PDX: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKLAMATH LAKE LAND TRUST: $500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCamp Fire Central Oregon: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNECANICUM WATERSHED COUNCIL: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCORVALLIS ENVIRONMENTAL CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNative Fish Society Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthwest Trail Alliance Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKINDNESS FARM: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNeighbors for Clean Air: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOUTDOOR EDUCATION ADVENTURES: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Coalition of Oregon Land Trusts: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNORTHWEST EARTH INSTITUTE: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILD RIVERS LAND TRUST: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILDLIFE CENTER OF THE NORTH COAST: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLUMBIA SLOUGH WATERSHED COUNCIL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOREGON GARDEN FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN NATURE PARTNERS PDX: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGreater Hells Canyon Council: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBARK: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThink Wild: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF MALHEUR NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSolar Oregon: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGREEN LENTS: $500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCOLUMBIA INSIGHT: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCommunity Energy Project Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget1000 FRIENDS OF OREGON: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA LAND TRUST: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLower Columbia Estuary Partnership: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oregon Community …Meyer Memorial TrustThe Collins FoundationThe Autzen FoundationThe Roundhouse Founda…Gray Family FoundationThe Bullitt FoundationJubitz Family Foundat…The Burning FoundationThe Healy FoundationPatagoniaorgSeeding Justice
The Oregon Community FoundationOR81.9× affinity59 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oregon Community Foundation · Meyer Memorial Trust · The Collins Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · The Roundhouse Foundation · Gray Family Foundation · The Bullitt Foundation · Jubitz Family Foundation · The Burning Foundation · The Healy Foundation · Patagoniaorg · Seeding Justice

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Earth Day Oregon funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Earth Day Oregon. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 220%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • Friends of Trees: 100% of income from government
  • Necanicum Watershed Council: 100% of income from government
  • Institute for Applied Ecology: 99% of income from government
  • Home Life Inc: 95% of income from government
  • Foodwaves: 54% of income from government
  • Wild Salmon Center: 49% of income from government
  • Umpqua Watersheds: 41% of income from government
  • Adventures Without Limits: 39% of income from government
  • Green Lents: 38% of income from government
  • Grow Portland: 36% of income from government
  • Urban Nature Partners Pdx: 34% of income from government
  • Lower Columbia Estuary Partnership: 29% of income from government
  • Native Fish Society Inc: 27% of income from government
  • Willamette Resources and Educational Network: 22% of income from government
  • Trailkeepers of Oregon: 19% of income from government
  • The Coalition of Oregon Land Trusts: 18% of income from government
  • Corvallis Environmental Center: 18% of income from government
  • Coalition of Communities of Color: 15% of income from government
  • Columbia Slough Watershed Council Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Familias en Accion: 8% of income from government
  • McKenzie River Trust: 8% of income from government
  • Think Wild: 7% of income from government
  • The Street Trust Community Fund: 6% of income from government
  • Growing Gardens: 6% of income from government
  • Walla Walla Basin Watershed Foundation: 4% of income from government
  • Bark: 2% of income from government
  • Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild: 2% of income from government
  • Columbia Riverkeeper: 1% of income from government
  • Tualatin Riverkeepers Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Oregon Garden Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Community Energy Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
22get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
5rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Earth Day Oregon?

Find your warmest path to Earth Day Oregon through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 74 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Earth Day Oregon’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home