Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Earth Day Network Inc

The mission of earth day network, inc.

$316k
Granted FY2023
2
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172023.

Environment$613k
02FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 2 grants below total $62,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $316,188 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $253,688 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$52,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TREES FOR THE FUTURE$52,500
REDWOOD FOREST FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 50% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%REDWOOD FOREST FOUNDATION: $10k → 18%Texas Trees Foundation: $5k → 14%NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION: $10k → 9%REDWOOD FOREST FOUNDATION: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Grants abroad, by region — $402k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 3 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

East Asia and the Pacific$266k · 66% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: MANGROVE TREE PLANTING IN SUNDERBUNS, WEST BENGAL INDIA FOR THE CANOPY PROJECT · TREE PLANTING KHULA BANGLADESH

North America (Canada and Mexico)$118k · 29% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: PLASTIC POLUTION PROJECT · CANADIAN NATIONAL GREENING PROGGRAM

Sub-Saharan Africa$18k · 4% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: TREE PLANTING GREWCOCK IHOFA VOHITSARA BIORESERVE

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Farmers for Forests Inc

The mission of Farmers for Forests (F4F) is to restore and protect green cover in India in close partnership with farmers and indigenous communities. All the on-ground work is enabled by AI and multi-spectral drone technology and satellite…

Human Services
2
Reforest the Tropics Incorporated

Development of programs to offset personal and corporate carbon emissions through reforestation in the tropics.

Environment
3
Reforest Our Future

MISSION PURPOSE - Reforest our Future is an independent public charity whose specific purposes both domestically and abroad are as follows: To advocate for and implement reforestation activities. To engage with and educate the public about…

Environment
4
Ctrees

To track carbon in every tree on the planet and to deliver science-based geospatial data for enabling natural climate solutions at all sacles.

Environment
5
Tree Foundation Inc

Sponsor education and conservation projects to save and protect trees and forest ecosystems.

Education
6
Center for Sustainable Economy

Promoting economic sustainability

Environment
7
TreeFolks Inc

Empowering central Texans to build stronger communities through planting and caring for trees.

8
Sustainable Forestry Initiative Inc

The sustainable forestry initiative (sfi) inc. is an independent, non-profit organization with a mission to advance sustainability through forest-focused collaborations. sfi is a leader through collaboration in standards, conservation,…

Environment
9
American Forests

Protection and expansion of threatened urban and wildland forest ecosystems. See Part III

Environment
10
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
11
The Foundation for Sustainable Forests Inc
Philanthropy
12
Trees Forever Foundation

Facilitate the planting and care of trees, woodlands, and forests through action-oriented programs that empower people, build community, and promote environmental awareness.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trees for the Future Inc and the most unlike its peers is Institute for Environmental Innovation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TREES FOR THE FUTURE INC — $540,300 · EnvironmentTREES FOR THE FUTURE INCInstitute for Environmental Innovation — $33,000 · EnvironmentInstitute for Environmental Innovation+1 more — $15,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Recreation & SportsTEXAS TREES FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Other
Environment$588,300Recreation & Sports$20,000Other$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTREES FOR THE FUTURE INC — $540,300 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetNATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREDWOOD FOREST FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTEXAS TREES FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE7.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Earth Day Network Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 5 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $444k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph