Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Early Learning Coalition of Okaloosa & Walton Counties Inc

To support the success of every child and their family through quality early education and care.

$5.1M
Granted FY2022
84
Grants FY2022
3
States reached
$455k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 84 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 84 grants below total $4,455,707 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $5,091,083 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $635,376 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k10 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k38 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k35 grants · $2.8M
  • $250k+1 grant · $455k
$42,642
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$455,098
KIDS DISCOVERY 7$157,611
KIDS DISCOVERY 2$141,858
OKALOOSA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT$132,234
KIDS DISCOVERY 1$106,152
KIDS DISCOVER 3$102,462
CROSSPOINT ACADEMY$99,363
STEPPING STONES TOO$97,284
JACOBS LADDER PRESCHOOL$93,217
CHILDCARE NETWORK 142$90,106
THE CREATIVE PLACE SCHOOL$82,304
THE ROANE SCHOOL$81,932
CHILDCARE NETWORK 268$77,963
CHILDCARE NETWORK 132$76,007
CHILDRENS CENTER HORIZONS$74,889
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CHILDRENS CENTER HORIZONS: $75k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field
03the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE EMERALD COAST INC — $455,098 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE EMERALD COAST INCCHILDCARE NETWORK INC — $402,745 · OtherCHILDCARE NETWORK INCKIDS DISCOVERY 2 — $248,010 · OtherKIDS DISCOVERY 2CROSSPOINT CHURCH INC — $204,431 · OtherKIDS DISCOVERY 7 — $157,611 · OtherSTEPPING STONES TOO — $157,450 · Other+62 more — $2,717,397 · Other+62 moreHORIZONS OF OKALOOSA COUNTY INC — $74,889 · Human ServicesYOUTH VILLAGE INC — $38,076 · Youth Development
Other$4,342,742Human Services$74,889Youth Development$38,076

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE EMERALD COAST INC — $455,098 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetHORIZONS OF OKALOOSA COUNTY INC — $74,889 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetYOUTH VILLAGE INC — $38,076 over 1y, 8.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE EMERALD COAST INC
  • Who funds HORIZONS OF OKALOOSA COUNTY INC
  • Who funds ALPHA & OMEGA CHRISTIAN LEARNING CENTER INC
  • Who funds YOUTH VILLAGE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO1.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Early Learning Coalition of Okaloosa & Walton Counties Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $31k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2022, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph