Skip to content

· Private foundation

Earl M Wilson Tuw FBO Nc Soc

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$37k
Granted FY2026still arriving
5
Grants FY2026still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Animals$150kHealth$27kHuman Services$5k
02FY2026 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k3 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$9,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$693k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BROTHER WOLF ANIMAL RESCUE INC$10,000
ASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC$10,000
HUMANE SOCIETY OF BUNCOMBE COUNTY$9,000
APPALACHIAN WILDLIFE REFUGE$5,000
AMERICAN HUMANE ASSOCIATION$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–23, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GIVENS ESTATES INC: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$205k · 7 repeat orgs$14k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +105% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2026, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

$205k
$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+105%
+39%

Still filing today

71%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
AnimalsHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AH
    ASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC
    6× · 2021–2026 · $68k · revenue +105%
  • BW
    Brother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc
    6× · 2021–2026 · $40k · revenue +488%
  • AW
    APPALACHIAN WILDLIFE REFUGE
    5× · 2021–2026 · $23k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • WF
    Wild for Life Center forgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +39%
  • TG
    THE GIVENS ESTATES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pom and the Hound Animal Refuge

Animal Welfare

—
2
Carolina Animal Network

we are a small animal rescue. We help the community by assisting with vet care and rehoming animals they cannot keep. We also pull dogs cats kittens and puppies from local kill shelters when they run out of space, we provide those animals…

Animals
3
Wild Souls Wildlife Rescue and Rehabilitation
Animals
4
Promoting Animal Welfare in North Carolina

Our main program is providing vet care to animals dropped at or rescued from the local animal shelter. This is the only service we provide and where our expenses go. We spay/neuter animals adopted from the shelter and provide vet care to…

Animals
5
Animals First Rescue of the Carolinas Inc

Rescue unwanted dogs and cats from high kill shelters and other dire circumstances. Provide veterinary care shelter and love until the pet is placed into an appropriate new home.

Animals
6
Blue Ridge Humane Society Inc

The Blue Ridge Humane Society is dedicated to ensuring the highest quality of life for animals in Henderson County and our neighboring communities through adoption outreach and education.

Animals
7
Forever Wild Wildlife Rescue
Animals
8
Happy Hen Animal Sanctuary
Animals
9
Pisgah Animal Welfare Society Inc
Animals
10
Bessies Creek Farm Animal Sanctuary & Rescue

Bessies Creek Farm Animal Sanctuary & Rescue is a non profit animal rescue and sanctuary.

—
11
Humane Society of Hardy County Inc

The Humane Society Hardy County strives reduce feral animal populations while enhancing the health of our communities and providing for those animals that may be adopted, a safe, nurturing, and healthy environment.

Animals
12
Animal Friends for Life

To rescue, rehabilitate and rehome senior and special needs companion animals. a home-like, cage-free, lifelong sanctuary is provided for every animal that enters the program.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Asheville Humane Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Humane Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $67,500 · AnimalsASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INCBrother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc: $40,000 · AnimalsBrother Wolf Animal Rescue IncAnimal Haven of Asheville: $29,500 · AnimalsAnimal Haven of AshevilleAPPALACHIAN WILDLIFE REFUGE: $23,000 · AnimalsAPPALACHIAN WILDLIFE REFUGEWild for Life Center for: $6,000 · Animals+1 more: $3,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF BUNCOMBE COUNTY: $18,000 · OtherHUMANE SOCIETY OF BUNCO…WILD FOR LIFE CENTER FOR REHABILITATION: $15,500 · OtherWILD FOR LIFE CENTER FO…WILD FOR LIFE CENTER FOR REHAB: $11,000 · OtherWILD FOR LIFE CENTER FO…THE GIVENS ESTATES INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Animals$169,000Other$44,500Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $67,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetBrother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc: $40,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetAnimal Haven of Asheville: $29,500 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetAPPALACHIAN WILDLIFE REFUGE: $23,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetWild for Life Center for: $6,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetTHE GIVENS ESTATES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Helen Kimberly JonesMO13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Helen Kimberly Jones · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Earl M Wilson Tuw FBO Nc Soc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Earl M Wilson Tuw FBO Nc Soc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Earl M Wilson Tuw FBO Nc Soc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph