Skip to content
Eagle Market Streets Development Co at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Eagle Market Streets Development Co

To develop people, property, and businesses, and envision equitable, socio-economic justice for all.

$560k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$109k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Philanthropy$389kHealth$381kHuman Services$302kReligion$135kArts & Culture$118kCivil Rights$109kEnvironment$75kYouth Development$60kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $66k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $494k
$60,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RACIAL JUSTICE COALITION OF AVL$108,801
SPILLWAY$75,000
YVETTE SMITH JIVES FOR HERS LLC$71,950
COMMUNITY FDNOF HENDERSON CTY$66,000
THE GRIND$60,000
KAIROS WEST COMMUNITY CENTER$60,000
MS LEAN$52,000
WEST MARION COMMUNITY FORUM INC$49,493
Individual grant recipient$16,530
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $121k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%TIA HART COMMUNITY RECOVERY PROGRAM: $61k → 15%TIA HART COMMUNITY RECOVERY PROGRAM: $61k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

60%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$847k · 6 repeat orgs$565k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$847k
$144k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+303%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $422k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Community ImprovementHuman ServicesHealthCivil RightsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PINNACLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP
    2× · 2021–2022 · $261k · revenue -74%
  • TH
    TIA HART COMMUNITY RECOVERY PROGRAM
    2× · 2021–2022 · $121k · revenue +9%
  • LS
    LA SEMILLA NFC UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    2× · 2021–2022 · $121k

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $90k
  • CG
    Camp Griergraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +303%
  • GC
    GRACE COVENANT PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $14k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Industry Value Interactionist League

NC CIVIL is a nonprofit community impact organization that develops grassroots approaches to structural disparities. Our mission is to increase resident involvement, improve organization of resources, and help institutions partner…

Youth Development
2
Black Mental Health & Wellness
Health
3
The Twin City Harm Reduction Collective

The twin city harm reduction collective seeks to improve the health and lives and advocate for the rights of people who use drugs in winston-salem, north carolina and surrounding areas.

Human Services
4
Integrated Community Collaborative
—
5
North Carolina Empowerment Organization
Civil Rights
6
North Carolina Community of Coalitions

The NC Carolina Community Coalitions (NC3) mission is to empower, enable and support community associations and organizations in their efforts to revitalize and improve the holistic quality of life for residents and others who work and…

Community Improvement
7
J-Jireh Services

promote and open community resources

Religion
8
Active Community Health Center of Broward Inc

We are and Agency created on the fundamental value that strengthening one family at a time will transform our community as a whole. we believe that all people should have access to behavioral healt servicesa and to live a fulfilling life.…

—
9
Carolinas Care Partnership

To seek justice through health and housing.

Health
10
Community Health Prevention Intervention Education & Research

Our mission is to promote health and wellness in the Deep South through Prevention, Intervention, Education, & Research.

—
11
Southlight Healthcare Inc

Southlight healthcare provides access to high-quality mental health and substance use treatment, fostering a resilient community by supporting individuals in their recovery.

Health
12
Joshua Community Connectors Inc

Joshua Community Connectors emerged as a beacon of hope within the Russell Community of West Louisville, a neighborhood brimming with potential yet often facing systemic challenges. Recognizing the unique struggles and aspirations of its…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pinnacle Community Development Corp; the most unlike its peers is New Life Connection. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LA SEMILLA NFC UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $121,000 · OtherLA SEMILLA NFC UNITED METHODIST CHURCHNEW LIFE CONNECTION: $121,000 · OtherNEW LIFE CONNECTIONYVETTE SMITH JIVES FOR HERS LLC: $103,450 · OtherYVETTE SMITH JIVES FOR HERS LLCIndividual grant recipient: $90,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSPILLWAY: $75,000 · OtherSPILLWAYTHE GRIND: $60,000 · OtherTHE GRINDKAIROS WEST COMMUNITY CENTER: $60,000 · OtherKAIROS WEST COMMUNITY CENTERMS LEAN: $52,000 · OtherMS LEAN+3 more: $45,030 · Other+3 moreCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HENDERSON COUNTY INC: $388,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF …PINNACLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $261,000 · Community ImprovementPINNACLE COMMUNITY …WEST MARION INC: $49,493 · Community ImprovementWEST MARION INCTIA HART COMMUNITY RECOVERY PROGRAM: $121,000 · Human ServicesINSTITUTE FOR PREVENTIVE HEALTHCARE AND ADVOCACY: $119,815 · HealthRacial Justice Coalition of Asheville Inc: $108,801 · Civil RightsCamp Grier: $25,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$727,480Philanthropy$388,500Community Improvement$310,493Human Services$121,000Health$119,815Civil Rights$108,801Recreation & Sports$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF HENDERSON COUNTY INC: $388,500 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetPINNACLE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $261,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetNEW LIFE CONNECTION: $121,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR PREVENTIVE HEALTHCARE AND ADVOCACY: $119,815 over 2y, 18% of budgetRacial Justice Coalition of Asheville Inc: $108,801 over 1y, 10% of budgetWEST MARION INC: $49,493 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCamp Grier: $25,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetYMI CULTURAL CENTER INC: $14,250 over 1y, 2.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Dogwood Health TrustThe Community Foundat…Duke Energy Foundation
Dogwood Health TrustNC17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Dogwood Health Trust · The Community Foundation of Western North Carolina Inc · Duke Energy Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eagle Market Streets Development Co funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eagle Market Streets Development Co. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Eagle Market Streets Development Co?

    Find your warmest path to Eagle Market Streets Development Co through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Eagle Market Streets Development’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home