Skip to content

· Private foundation

Eagle Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41M
Granted FY2024still arriving
65
Grants FY2024still arriving
21
States reached
$6.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$83MEducation$29MPublic Safety & Disaster$21MReligion$11MHuman Services$10MHealth$8.8MEnvironment$800kPhilanthropy$395kOther$0
02FY2024 · 65 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k17 grants · $390k
  • $50k–250k16 grants · $1.7M
  • $250k+32 grants · $39M
$200,000
Median grant
21
States reached
$991M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Creighton University - ARRUPE$6,000,000
Catholic Relief Services Pathways Latin America$4,250,000
Partners in Health Buraro Hospital Rwanda$4,000,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000,000
Mercy Corps Dreams Tanzania$2,700,000
Catholic Relief Services Undesignated FOSTER Grant$1,500,000
World Vision Undesignated FOSTER Grant$1,500,000
Root Capital$1,500,000
Parters in Health Undesignated FOSTER Grant$1,250,000
CURE International$1,000,000
Mercy Corps Undesignated FOSTER Grant$1,000,000
Heifer International BSLD-India$1,000,000
International Rescue Committee$1,000,000
Cross Catholic Outreach$1,000,000
Educate Uganda$550,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $5.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MATER DEI USA: $50k → 6%Mater Dei USA: $50k → 14%WATER4 INC: $150k → 16%PEOPLE FOR GUATEMALA INC: $50k → 10%UNBOUND: $500k → 16%Mater Dei USA: $50k → 6%MATER DEI USA: $50k → 14%VIDA DE GUATEMALA USA INC: $100k → 8%Water4: $150k → 16%PEOPLE FOR GUATEMALA INC: $50k → 10%Unbound: $500k → 16%MATER DEI USA: $50k → 14%Vida de Guatemala USA Inc: $50k → 8%People for Guatemala: $5k → 10%Unbound: $400k → 16%NURSING HEART INC: $100k → 14%Vida De Guatemala USA: $50k → 8%People for Guatemala Inc: $50k → 10%Unbound: $400k → 16%NURSING HEART INC: $100k → 14%UNBOUND: $200k → 16%ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES: $20k → 12%Nursing Heart Inc: $110k → 14%Nursing Heart Inc: $100k → 14%Essential Pregnancy Services: $10k → 12%GIVEDIRECTLY INC: $500k → 17%NURSING HEART INC: $100k → 14%Nursing Heart Inc: $100k → 14%GiveDirectly Inc: $500k → 17%Give Directly: $500k → 17%GIVEDIRECTLY INC: $250k → 17%Omaha Bridges Out of Poverty: $40k → 12%Omaha Welcomes the Stranger: $32k → 12%Justice for Our Neighbors CIRA: $30k → 12%OMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY: $50k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
NJ
CA
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
KS
AR
DC
OK
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$121M · 69 repeat orgs$40M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

69 repeat relationships: 37 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 28 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

69
40

Total granted

$121M
$16M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+16%

Still filing today

68%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHuman ServicesEducationHealthHousing & ShelterReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    7× · 2017–2023 · $13M · revenue +120%
  • MC
    Mercy Corps
    5× · 2018–2023 · $5.7M · revenue +22%
  • HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL
    4× · 2017–2023 · $5.5M · revenue +37%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $6.0M
  • CU
    Creighton University - ARRUPE Scholars
    one grant, 2021 · $5.0M
  • HI
    Heifer International
    one grant, 2022 · $2.0M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
2
Charity Global Inc

Charity: water is a non-profit organization bringing clean and safe water to people around the world. continued on schedule o.

Human Services
3
Zoe Empowers

Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…

International
4
Empowering Lives International

Empowering Lives International (ELI) ignites world changers. We equip families and orphans to crush poverty, embrace Christ, and share their transformation with others through their God-honoring income, their deepening relationship with…

Religion
5
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
6
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
7
Splash International

The mission of Splash International and its subsidiaries is to ensure clean water for children. Splash partners with governments and local organizations to deliver sustainable water, sanitation, hygiene, and menstrual health programs in…

Environment
8
Health Poverty Action Usa

Health Poverty Action USA acts in solidarity with health workers, activists & communities worldwide to improve health & challenge the causes of poverty. We do this in 3 distinct ways: 1. We approach health as an issue of social justice. We…

International
9
Mano a Mano International Partners

The organization is guided by the simple premise that groups of committed individuals can reach across national boundaries to make a dramatic difference in the lives of others. the power of this premise has been demonstrated by the extent…

Housing & Shelter
10
Global Partners in Care

The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.

International
11
Pathfinder International

Pathfinder expands access to sexual and reproductive health services, opening the door to opportunities for women and all individuals to thrive-economically, educationally, and civically. driven by our country-led leadership and local…

International
12
Partnership for Indigenous Peoples -Pipes - International

We are a global Christian organization committed to partnering with indigenous peoples, local churches, and community-based organizations to make disciples of Jesus Christ and help end extreme poverty. We serve indigenous pygmies,…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc; the most unlike its peers is Global Spine Outreach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 138 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/65
Grantees still filing
40/65
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $20,750,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICESCreighton University - ARRUPE: $12,000,000 · OtherCreighton University - ARRUPEWorld Vision and Water for People: $6,900,000 · OtherWorld Vision and Water for PeopleIndividual grant recipient: $6,000,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCreighton University - ARRUPE Scholars: $5,000,000 · OtherCatholic Relief Services Pathways Latin America: $4,250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $4,000,000 · OtherPartners in Health Buraro Hospital Rwanda: $4,000,000 · OtherCROSS CATHOLIC OUTREACH INC: $3,400,000 · OtherDIOCESE OF GRAND ISLAND: $3,300,000 · Other+74 more: $24,520,050 · Other+74 moreWORLD VISION INC: $9,250,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INCROOT CAPITAL INC: $7,350,000 · InternationalROOT CAPITAL INCMercy Corps: $5,700,000 · InternationalMercy CorpsHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $5,500,000 · InternationalHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONALWATER FOR PEOPLE: $4,000,000 · InternationalWATER FOR PEOPLEMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,900,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCLIVING GOODS: $2,600,000 · InternationalEDUCATE UGANDA: $1,950,000 · InternationalCURE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,750,000 · International+21 more: $10,205,000 · International+21 morePARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $12,500,000 · Health+2 more: $360,000 · HealthGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $3,050,000 · Human ServicesUnbound: $2,000,000 · Human ServicesNURSING HEART INC: $610,000 · Human ServicesWATER4 INC: $300,000 · Human ServicesMATER DEI USA: $250,000 · Human Services+7 more: $712,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND OF OMAHA: $1,485,000 · EducationCreighton University: $1,050,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $950,000 · EducationAMIGOS DE SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION: $500,000 · EducationJARDIN DE AMOR: $275,000 · EducationCUES FUND: $270,000 · ReligionSupport Our Aging Religious Inc: $250,000 · ReligionSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $350,000 · Housing & ShelterPEOPLE'S CITY MISSION: $20,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$94,120,050International$51,205,000Health$12,860,000Human Services$6,922,000Education$4,260,000Religion$520,000Housing & Shelter$370,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $12,500,000 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $9,250,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetROOT CAPITAL INC: $7,350,000 over 7y, 6.3% of budgetMercy Corps: $5,700,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetHEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL: $5,500,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetWATER FOR PEOPLE: $4,000,000 over 6y, 3.6% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $3,050,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $2,900,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLIVING GOODS: $2,600,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetUnbound: $2,000,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetEDUCATE UGANDA: $1,950,000 over 8y, 25% of budgetCURE INTERNATIONAL INC: $1,750,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND OF OMAHA: $1,485,000 over 5y, 19% of budgetENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS-USAINC: $1,400,000 over 4y, 6.8% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $1,350,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $1,250,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCreighton University: $1,050,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFAITH IN PRACTICE: $1,000,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $950,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSEMILLA NUEVA: $750,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetGLOBAL SPINE OUTREACH: $700,000 over 4y, 63% of budgetFLORESTA USA INCORPORATED: $700,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetNURSING HEART INC: $610,000 over 6y, 58% of budgetPENCILS OF PROMISE INCORPORATED: $550,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetAMIGOS DE SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 6y, 25% of budgetLIFENET INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION: $500,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OMAHA INC: $415,000 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetLALMBA ASSOCIATION: $400,000 over 3y, 20% of budgetAQUA-AFRICA INC: $350,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $350,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetWATER4 INC: $300,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetFamily of the Americas Foundation Inc: $300,000 over 4y, 48% of budgetTHE DIGDEEP RIGHT TO WATER PROJECT: $300,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetJARDIN DE AMOR: $275,000 over 7y, 73% of budgetCUES FUND: $270,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetSupport Our Aging Religious Inc: $250,000 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetMATER DEI USA: $250,000 over 5y, 47% of budgetSEED EFFECT: $250,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetVILLAGE ENTERPRISE FUND: $250,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetRedeem International: $200,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetCOMMON HOPE: $200,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetMATT TALBOT KITCHEN & OUTREACH: $175,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetPEOPLE FOR GUATEMALA INC: $155,000 over 4y, 8.6% of budgetOMAHA BRIDGES OUT OF POVERTY INC: $90,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetHAVEN OF HOPE: $75,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetFLATWATER COLLECTIVE: $60,000 over 2y, 26% of budgetThe One Thread Project Inc: $50,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetREEDS OF HOPE: $50,000 over 1y, 31% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROOT CAPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗
  • Who funds HEIFER PROJECT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds WATER FOR PEOPLE ↗
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds LIVING GOODS ↗
  • Who funds Unbound ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATE UGANDA ↗
  • Who funds CURE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S SCHOLARSHIP FUND OF OMAHA ↗
  • Who funds ENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS-USAINC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds Creighton University ↗
  • Who funds FAITH IN PRACTICE ↗
  • Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Lozier FoundationNE23.3× affinity9 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Lozier Foundation · The Charles and Mary Heider Family Foundation · The Sherwood Foundation · Nebraska Community Foundation · The Hawks Foundation · Dovetail Impact Foundation (Fka David Weekley Family Foundation) · Robert B Daugherty Foundation · Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · Keith Margareth and Sandra Smith Foundation · Greater Omaha Packing Co Foundation · Dennis & Ellin Murphy Foundation · Jc & Jessie Seacrest Family Fndtn First Nebraska Trust Co Trustee

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Eagle Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Eagle Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
  • Root Capital Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Eagle Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Eagle Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 138 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Eagle’s filings →

More from the funding graph