Skip to content

· Private foundation

EA Barvoets Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$99kYouth Development$24kPhilanthropy$23kAnimals$18kRecreation & Sports$16kArts & Culture$4kEducation$3kReligion$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $30k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$145k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Donate Life$10,000
Breakthrough T1D New York Chapter$7,500
Albany Medical Center Foundation$7,500
Mohawk Hudson Humane Society$5,000
Capital District Youth Tennis Foundation$5,000
Junior Achievment of Northeastern NY$3,500
Blood Cancer United$500
American Heart Association$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Community Hospice: $1k → 14%Living Resources: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$129k · 11 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
14

Total granted

$129k
$41k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+9%

Still filing today

55%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AM
    ALBANY MED HEALTH SYSTEM
    3× · 2020–2024 · $23k · revenue +82%
  • NY
    NEW YORK ALLIANCE FOR DONATION INC DBA DONATE LIFE NEW YORK STATE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $23k · revenue +21%
  • AP
    ALBANY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • BT
    Breakthrough T1D (Formerly JDRF NY Chapter)
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
  • JN
    JDRF NE NY Chapter
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • NK
    NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION NORTHEAS
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
2
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
3
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
4
Critical Path Institute

The critical path institute is a catalyst in the development of new approaches that advance medical innovation and regulatory science. this is achieved by leading teams that share data, knowledge and expertise resulting in sound, consensus…

Health
5
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
6
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
7
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
8
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
9
American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

To advance and disseminate the science and practice of hepatology, and to promote liver health and quality patient care.

Health
10
Lung Cancer Research Foundation

The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.

Health
11
American Lung Association

The american lung association's mission is to save lives by improving lung health and preventing lung disease. we do this through education, advocacy, and research.

Health
12
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Albany Med Health System; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $22,500 · OtherALBANY MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATIONCapital District Youth Tennis Foundation: $14,000 · OtherCapital District Youth Tennis FoundationJunior Achievment of Northeastern NY: $12,000 · OtherJunior Achievment of Northeastern NYDonate Life: $10,000 · OtherDonate LifeBreakthrough T1D (Formerly JDRF NY Chapter): $7,500 · OtherBreakthrough T1D (Formerly JDRF NY Chapter)Breakthrough T1D New York Chapter: $7,500 · OtherBreakthrough T1D New York ChapterJDRF NE NY Chapter: $7,500 · OtherJDRF NE NY ChapterNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION NORTHEAS: $5,000 · OtherJDRF Upstate NY Chapter: $5,000 · OtherNational Kidney Foundation NE Chapt: $4,000 · Other+7 more: $14,000 · Other+7 moreALBANY MED HEALTH SYSTEM: $22,500 · HealthALBANY MED HEALTH SYSTEMNEW YORK ALLIANCE FOR DONATION INC DBA DONATE LIFE NEW YORK STATE: $22,500 · HealthNEW YORK ALLIANCE FOR DONATI…+4 more: $2,975 · Health+4 moreMOHAWK & HUDSON RIVER HUMANE SOCIETY: $16,000 · AnimalsMOHAWK & …ALBANY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentDavidson Community Players: $3,500 · Arts & CultureTHE COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesLIVING RESOURCES CORPORATION: $500 · Human ServicesSPECIAL OPERATORS TRANSITION FOUNDATION INC: $300 · Public Benefit
Other$109,000Health$47,975Animals$16,000Youth Development$10,000Arts & Culture$3,500Human Services$1,500Public Benefit$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALBANY MED HEALTH SYSTEM: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK ALLIANCE FOR DONATION INC DBA DONATE LIFE NEW YORK STATE: $22,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetMOHAWK & HUDSON RIVER HUMANE SOCIETY: $16,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetALBANY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetDavidson Community Players: $3,500 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLA SALLE SCHOOL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $975 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING RESOURCES CORPORATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OPERATORS TRANSITION FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALBANY MED HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK ALLIANCE FOR DONATION INC DBA DONATE LIFE NEW YORK STATE ↗
  • Who funds MOHAWK & HUDSON RIVER HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ALBANY POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Davidson Community Players ↗
  • Who funds LA SALLE SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY HOSPICE INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds LIVING RESOURCES CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OPERATORS TRANSITION FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rose & Kiernan Charitable Foundation IncNY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rose & Kiernan Charitable Foundation Inc · Review Foundation · The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization EA Barvoets Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from EA Barvoets Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to EA Barvoets Fund?

    Find your warmest path to EA Barvoets Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on EA Barvoets’ filings →

    More from the funding graph