Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

E a Moos Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$174k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Environment$416kHealth$80kFood & Nutrition$59kHuman Services$52kAnimals$16kReligion$12kRecreation & Sports$11kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$312k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREENWOOD GARDENS$125,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$10,000
COMMUNITY FOODBANK OF NEW JERSEY$10,000
COMPASSION AND CHOICES$10,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$5,000
THE ALEX MANFULL FUND$5,000
CHESHIRE HOME FOR DISABLED YOUNG PE$3,000
SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME$3,000
Individual grant recipient$1,200
SUMMIT AREA YMCA$1,000
MILLBURNSHORT HILLS VOLUNTEER FIRST$500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 5%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 5%CHESHIRE HOUSE: $10k → 4%SUMMIT AREA YMCA: $1k → 10%CHESHIRE HOUSE: $1k → 4%CHESHIRE HOUSE: $1k → 4%Cheshire Home: $1k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$656k · 14 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

14 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
19

Total granted

$656k
$35k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+19%

Still filing today

50%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEnvironmentEducationCivil RightsFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GREENWOOD GARDENS
    8× · 2017–2025 · $416k · revenue +31%
  • CC
    COMPASSION & CHOICES
    5× · 2021–2025 · $55k · revenue +40%
  • CF
    Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc
    5× · 2020–2025 · $44k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • CH
    Cheshire House
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
  • TN
    THE NEWMARK SCHOOL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +52%
  • CF
    Communty Foundation NJ
    one grant, 2017 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Newmark High School Inc

Newmark high school is committed to helping students succeed both academically and socially in an atmosphere that holds them accountable for their own achievement. the cornerstone of each students development is an individually tailored,…

Education
2
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
4
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
5
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Nassau Suffolk Services for the Autistic Inc

Nassau suffolk services for the autistic (nssa) offers hope to people with autism and their families by providing high quality life-long support through services which enable people with autism to function better in everday life. nssa…

Health
8
Southern Jersey Family Medical Centers Inc

Sjfmc is committed to improving lives by providing and promoting quality, innovative and responsive health care to individuals and families in a welcoming and compassionate manner, regardless of ability to pay.

Health
9
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
New Jersey State Nurses Association

Work for the improvement of health standards and the availability of healthcare services for all people; foster high standards of nursing; stimulate and promote the professional development of nurses; advance the economic and general…

11
Newgrange School of Princeton Inc

To empower people with learning disabilities to reach their full potential as educated and productive members of society

12
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Southampton Fresh Air Home and the most unlike its peers is The Alex Manfull Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GREENWOOD GARDENS — $416,100 · EnvironmentGREENWOOD GARDENSTHE SALVATION ARMY — $42,750 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipi…NEXT MEAL FOUNDATION — $15,000 · OtherNEXT MEAL FOUNDATIONSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JERSEY INC — $10,500 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JE…AMERICAN RED CROSS — $10,000 · OtherAMERICAN RED CROSSChrist Church — $8,000 · OtherChrist ChurchCheshire House — $6,000 · OtherCommunty Foundation NJ — $5,000 · Other+19 more — $24,600 · Other+19 moreCOMPASSION & CHOICES — $55,000 · Civil RightsCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc — $44,000 · Food & NutritionTHE ALEX MANFULL FUND — $15,000 · HealthTHE SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME — $3,000 · HealthThe Summit Medical Group Foundation Inc — $1,250 · HealthCHESHIRE HOME INC — $13,000 · Human ServicesBONNIE BRAE — $1,000 · Human ServicesSUMMIT AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE NEWMARK SCHOOL INC — $5,000 · Education
Environment$416,100Other$141,850Civil Rights$55,000Food & Nutrition$44,000Health$19,250Human Services$15,000Education$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREENWOOD GARDENS — $416,100 over 8y, 5.1% of budgetCOMPASSION & CHOICES — $55,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc — $44,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALEX MANFULL FUND — $15,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetCHESHIRE HOME INC — $13,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JERSEY INC — $10,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NEWMARK SCHOOL INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SAG HARBOR HISTORICAL MUSEUM INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetThe Summit Medical Group Foundation Inc — $1,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBONNIE BRAE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MARFAN FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RAPTOR TRUST — $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSHAKESPEARE THEATRE OF NEW JERSEY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew Eyes for the Needy Inc — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREENWOOD GARDENS
  • Who funds COMPASSION & CHOICES
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc
  • Who funds THE ALEX MANFULL FUND
  • Who funds CHESHIRE HOME INC
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW JERSEY INC
  • Who funds THE NEWMARK SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds THE SOUTHAMPTON FRESH AIR HOME
  • Who funds THE SAG HARBOR HISTORICAL MUSEUM INC
  • Who funds The Summit Medical Group Foundation Inc
  • Who funds BONNIE BRAE
  • Who funds SUMMIT AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION
  • Who funds THE MARFAN FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds THE RAPTOR TRUST
  • Who funds SHAKESPEARE THEATRE OF NEW JERSEY
  • Who funds New Eyes for the Needy Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ20.6× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Investors Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Ej Grassmann Trust · The Provident Bank Foundation · Citizens Philanthropic Foundation Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization E a Moos Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • Cheshire Home Inc6% of income from government
  • Bonnie Brae3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to E a Moos Foundation?

Find your warmest path to E a Moos Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph