Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Dysautonomia International Inc

To increase awareness of Dysautonomia within the medical community and the general public and raise funds for dysautonomia research.

$111k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$29k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Health$1.3MRecreation & Sports$45kEducation$22k
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 3 grants below total $81,582 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $110,825 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $29,243 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

$27,220
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children$29,362
JOHN HOPKIN UNIVERSTY$27,220
Regents of Univ of CALIFORNIA$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Brigham & Womens Hospital: $30k → 16%PENN STATE UNIVERSITY: $22k → 12%Leeland Stadford Junior Unive: $60k → 8%Regents of Univ of CALIFORNIA: $50k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN: $44k → 10%UNIVSERSITY OF TEXAS: $100k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDA: $75k → 13%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $125k → 17%THE METROLHEALTH: $15k → 17%University of Toledo: $30k → 18%Ann & Robert H Lurie Children: $29k → 14%John Hopkins University: $50k → 19%Leeland Stadford Junior Unive: $25k → 8%Regents of Univ of CALIFORNIA: $30k → 11%UNIVSERSITY OF TEXAS: $50k → 14%University of Toledo: $25k → 18%Ann & Robert H Lurie Children: $10k → 14%JOHN HOPKIN UNIVERSTY: $27k → 19%Regents of Univ of CALIFORNIA: $25k → 11%UNIVSERSITY OF TEXAS: $50k → 14%University of Toledo: $20k → 18%John Hopkins University: $25k → 19%Regents of Univ of CALIFORNIA: $25k → 11%UNIVSERSITY OF TEXAS: $50k → 14%JOHN HOPKIN UNIVERSTY: $25k → 19%JOHN HOPKIN UNIVERSTY: $15k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
IL
WI
MA
OH
PA
CA
UT
MD
OK
TX

Grants abroad, by region — $29k on the FY2024 return

Schedule F, as filed: 1 region. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

North America (Canada and Mexico)$29k · 100% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: POTS RESEARCH

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of Dysautonomia International Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Dysautonomia International Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.5% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$825k · 7 repeat orgs$426k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$825k
$426k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+40%

Still filing today

14%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE
    4× · 2018–2023 · $250k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF UTAH
    4× · 2018–2023 · $189k
  • RO
    Regents of Univ of CALIFORNIA
    4× · 2021–2024 · $130k

Funded once

  • TM
    THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $125k · revenue +40%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2018 · $75k · revenue -124%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field
05the grantee network

4 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 4 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
4/4
Grantees still filing
3/4
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTE — $249,999 · OtherTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTEUNIVERSITY OF UTAH — $188,526 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF UTAHRegents of Univ of CALIFORNIA — $130,200 · OtherRegents of Univ of CALIFORNIAUNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX — $100,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SUSSEXJOHNS HOPKINS — $75,000 · OtherJOHNS HOPKINSUNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO — $75,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TOLEDOJOHN HOPKIN UNIVERSTY — $67,220 · OtherJOHN HOPKIN UNIVERSTYUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS — $44,300 · Other+4 more — $81,826 · Other+4 moreTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $125,353 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF W…THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $85,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF…UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA F…Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $39,362 · Health
Other$1,012,071Education$285,353Health$39,362

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC — $125,353 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $85,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAnn & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago — $39,362 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dysautonomia International Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dysautonomia International Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Dysautonomia International Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph