Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dvaykus Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$298k
Granted FY2025still arriving
66
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$77k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$1.8MEducation$313kInternational$53kHuman Services$37kPhilanthropy$16kHealth$6kOther$0
02FY2025 · 66 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k60 grants · $160k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $61k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $77k
$2,200
Median grant
9
States reached
$3.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF AHAVAT SHALOM$77,000
BETH MEDRASH GOVOHA$16,000
YESHIVA DARCHE TORAH$13,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT D'MIR INC$12,000
HINENI$10,000
KOLLEL ZICHRON YOSEF$10,000
KHAL OF SOUTH WHITESVILLE$8,500
TORAH ACADEMY FOR GIRLS$7,500
Individual grant recipient$7,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAIS HAMEDRASH TAHAROS$6,000
YESHIVA OF FAR ROCKAWAY$6,000
TORAH DAY SCHOOL OF SEATTLE$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
KEREN AHAVAS CHESED$5,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHEVRA KADISHA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ACHIEZER: $4k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $2k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $2k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $2k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $2k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $2k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $2k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $2k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $2k → 6%ACHIEZER: $1k → 6%ACHIEZER: $1k → 6%ACHIEZER: $1k → 6%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $1k → 6%ACHIEZER: $1k → 6%AL KANFEI NESHARIM: $1k → 6%ACHIEZER: $1k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
PA
NJ
MD
AZ
NM
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 65 repeat orgs$182k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

65 repeat relationships: 48 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

65
34

Total granted

$2.4M
$148k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
0%

Still filing today

34%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionInternationalPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $557k · revenue +32%
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MINYAN AVREICHIM
    5× · 2017–2021 · $80k · revenue +24%
  • TS
    TORAH SYNAGOGUE FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $45k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF AHAVAT SHALOM
    one grant, 2019 · $62k
  • AF
    American Friends of Yeshiva Gedolah Matisyahu Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +89%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
3
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
4
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
5
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion
6
Sherit Isroel
—
7
American Friends of Amaleh Shel Torah Inc

None

Education
8
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Ziv Israel Association
—
10
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
11
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
12
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chasdei Yisroel Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Leon Mayer Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/43
Grantees still filing
27/43
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $201,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBETH MEDRASH GOVOHA: $132,250 · OtherBETH MEDRASH GOVOHAYESHIVA DARCHE TORAH: $95,600 · OtherYESHIVA DARCHE TORAHHINENI INC: $95,000 · OtherHINENI INCKOLLEL ZICHRON YOSEF: $90,000 · OtherKOLLEL ZICHRON YOSEFAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MINYAN AVREICHIM: $80,200 · OtherTORAH ACADEMY FOR GIRLS: $70,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF AHAVAT SHALOM: $62,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $61,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $56,000 · Other+69 more: $664,500 · Other+69 moreFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC: $557,000 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM I…TORAH SYNAGOGUE FOUNDATION: $45,000 · PhilanthropyTORAH SYNAGOGUE FOUNDATION+4 more: $32,500 · PhilanthropyCONGREGATION BNOS YAAKOV INC: $29,000 · EducationTIFERES BAIS YAAKOV INC: $27,000 · EducationAmerican Friends of Yeshiva Gedolah Matisyahu Inc: $20,000 · EducationCONG OROS BAIS YAAKOV OF LAKEWOOD: $15,000 · EducationAmerican Friends of Yeshivat Har Hamor: $11,000 · EducationSEWARD PARK JEWISH PRESCHOOL CO-OP: $5,000 · Education+5 more: $8,000 · EducationYESHIVA OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $55,300 · ReligionJEWISH RESOURCE CENTER: $19,500 · ReligionHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $15,000 · ReligionZEEV HATORAH INC: $7,000 · ReligionKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $6,000 · Religion+3 more: $4,800 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $26,500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHVUT AMI: $24,000 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAIS MEDRASH TAHAROS: $23,000 · InternationalAVIV HA TORAH: $11,000 · International+4 more: $7,000 · InternationalDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $16,600 · Human ServicesACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $9,000 · Human ServicesAL KANFEI NISHARIM INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Arts & CultureGEMACH ZICHRON MOSHE INC: $500 · Community Improvement
Other$1,607,550Philanthropy$634,500Education$115,000Religion$107,600International$91,500Human Services$26,600Arts & Culture$1,000Community Improvement$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC: $557,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetHINENI INC: $95,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MINYAN AVREICHIM: $80,200 over 5y, 9.2% of budgetYESHIVA OF FAR ROCKAWAY: $55,300 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTORAH SYNAGOGUE FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 9y, 4.1% of budgetCONGREGATION BNOS YAAKOV INC: $29,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTIFERES BAIS YAAKOV INC: $27,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $26,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHVUT AMI: $24,000 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAIS MEDRASH TAHAROS: $23,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH RESOURCE CENTER: $19,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $16,600 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCHASDEI YISROEL INC: $15,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetCONG OROS BAIS YAAKOV OF LAKEWOOD: $15,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE: $15,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Yeshivat Har Hamor: $11,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $11,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAVIV HA TORAH: $11,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetACHIEZER COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $9,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetZEEV HATORAH INC: $7,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN HASHVIIS INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYAD YISROEL: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROFEH CHOLIM CANCER SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Friends of Imrei Noam: $3,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF BET EL YESHIVA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEZER MIZION: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS MEDRASH L'TORAH A NJ NONPROFIT CORP: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJewish Content Inc: $1,800 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF EZRA L MARPEH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetZECHER AVROHOM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRENCH HILL KOLLEL: $1,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NEFESH HACHAIM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEMACH ZICHRON MOSHE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF AHAVATH SHALOM INC ↗
  • Who funds HINENI INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MINYAN AVREICHIM ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA OF FAR ROCKAWAY ↗
  • Who funds TORAH SYNAGOGUE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CONGREGATION BNOS YAAKOV INC ↗
  • Who funds TIFERES BAIS YAAKOV INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SHVUT AMI ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF BAIS MEDRASH TAHAROS ↗
  • Who funds American Friends of Yeshiva Gedolah Matisyahu Inc ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CHASDEI YISROEL INC ↗
  • Who funds CONG OROS BAIS YAAKOV OF LAKEWOOD ↗
  • Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY37.9× affinity29 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Zichron Yechiel Mechel Foundation · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · The Jmg Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Zichron Btz Tzedakah Foundation · Donors Fund Inc · Toras Chesed Inc · The Zev and Susan Munk Family Foundation · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dvaykus Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dvaykus Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 70%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Tiferes Bais Yaakov Inc: 16% of income from government
  • Mesorah Heritage Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 117 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dvaykus’ filings →

More from the funding graph