Skip to content

· Private foundation

Durkin Legacy Fund

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$40kHuman Services$22kYouth Development$19kEnvironment$12kAnimals$5kArts & Culture$5kFood & Nutrition$3kEducation$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$1,200
Median grant
3
States reached
$230k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Womens Health Charities$10,000
Girl Scouts San Jacinto Council$10,000
American Friends of Canadian Nature$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,200
Memorial Assistance Ministries$500
Houston Food Bank$500
Citizens for Animal Protection$400
Wikimedia Foundation$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%Unbound: $600 → 16%Unbound: $600 → 16%Houston Area Women's Center: $5k → 16%Houston Area Women's Center: $5k → 16%Houston Area Women's Center: $5k → 16%Houston Area Women's Center: $2k → 16%Memorial Assistance Ministries: $1k → 16%Memorial Assistance Ministries: $1k → 16%Memorial Assistance Ministries: $500 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of Durkin Legacy Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Durkin Legacy Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 4.2% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$96k · 13 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
4

Total granted

$96k
$9k

Still filing today

54%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEnvironmentAnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    Houston Area Women's Center
    4× · 2020–2023 · $17k · revenue +44%
  • MA
    Memorial Assistance Ministries
    3× · 2021–2024 · $3k · revenue +137%
  • CF
    Citizens For Animal Protection Inc
    4× · 2020–2024 · $3k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • EV
    Elk Valley Land Trust
    one grant, 2023 · $4k
  • GS
    Girls Scouts San Jacinto Council
    one grant, 2022 · $4k
  • ER
    Elk River Alliance
    one grant, 2023 · $754
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
The Houston Audubon Society

To advance the conservation of birds and their habitats in the Greater Houston Gulf Coast region by acquiring and maintaining critical habitat as bird sanctuaries, providing education programs and nature experiences, and advocating policy…

Environment
4
Rainforest Alliance Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

—
5
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
6
African Wildlife Foundation Inc

Awf's mission is to ensure wildlife and wild lands thrive in modern africa. we work to equip african governments, institutions, business, and communities with the tools, insights, and support they need to define, own, and realize a…

Animals
7
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
8
Houston Zoo Inc

Mission: Connect communities with animals, inspiring action to save wildlife. Vision: Be a leader in the global movement to save wildlife. (Continued on Schedule O) Houston Zoo, Inc. (HZI) strives to be a zoo that practices exemplary…

Animals
9
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
10
Coastal Bend Bays & Estuaries Program Inc

Coastal bend bays & estuaries program is dedicated to protecting and restoring bays and estuaries of the texas coastal bend. coastal bend bays and estuaries remain a vital part of the environmental and economic landscape by preserving and…

Environment
11
National Audubon Society Inc

We work towards a future where birds thrive across the americas because audubon is a powerful, diverse, and ever-growing force for conservation. (continued on schedule o).

Environment
12
Rainforest Alliance Holding Inc

RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wikimedia Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Canadian Nature Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Women's Health Charities: $20,000 · OtherWomen's Health CharitiesWomen's Health Charity: $20,000 · OtherWomen's Health CharityGirl Scouts San Jacinto Council: $15,000 · OtherGirl Scouts San Jacinto CouncilIndividual grant recipient: $4,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4,600 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYElk Valley Land Trust: $3,770 · OtherGirls Scouts San Jacinto Council: $3,500 · OtherThe Houston Food Bank: $2,900 · Other+4 more: $6,054 · Other+4 moreHouston Area Women's Center: $17,000 · Human ServicesHouston Area Women's …Memorial Assistance Ministries: $2,900 · Human ServicesMemorial Assistance M…Unbound: $1,200 · Human ServicesUnboundAMERICAN FRIENDS OF CANADIAN NATURE INC: $3,300 · EnvironmentCitizens For Animal Protection Inc: $2,800 · AnimalsWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $1,300 · Education
Other$80,624Human Services$21,100Environment$3,300Animals$2,800Education$1,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHouston Area Women's Center: $17,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4,600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF CANADIAN NATURE INC: $3,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMemorial Assistance Ministries: $2,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $2,900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCitizens For Animal Protection Inc: $2,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC: $1,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUnbound: $1,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Houston Area Women's Center ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CANADIAN NATURE INC ↗
  • Who funds Memorial Assistance Ministries ↗
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds Citizens For Animal Protection Inc ↗
  • Who funds WIKIMEDIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Unbound ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Durkin Legacy Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Durkin Legacy Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Durkin Legacy’s filings →

    More from the funding graph