Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dry Creek Charity

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$241k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$89k
Largest
01What it funds
0163% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$475kYouth Development$128kInternational$121kFood & Nutrition$117kEnvironment$55kReligion$27kHealth$25kHuman Services$21kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $89k
$5,784
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$89,232
Individual grant recipient$34,091
SALT LAKE EDUCATION FOUNDATION$28,538
Individual grant recipient$25,000
CITY OF SO SALT LAKE AFTER SCHOOL$17,537
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FUND$10,000
VIETNAM PROJECTS$6,713
Individual grant recipient$5,784
E MILLCREEK COMMUNITY GARDEN$5,343
INDIGEHUB FOOD HUB$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
ESSELSTYN FOUNDATION$2,500
PERU PROJECTS$1,900
Individual grant recipient$796
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 72% of grant dollars ($1.4M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 28% that went abroad ($535k) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 2% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%INDIGEHUB FOOD HUB: $10k → 32%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FUND: $10k → 10%HOPE PROJECTS: $8k → 5%SECOND SERVE: $25k → 9%GREAT BASIN WATER DISTRICT: $12k → 15%NUTRIEX RESEARCH: $89k → 8%SECOND SERVE: $6k → 9%NUTRIEX RESEARCH: $61k → 8%PLANT BASED UTAH: $34k → 8%NUTRIEX RESEARCH: $30k → 8%PLANT BASED UTAH: $25k → 8%NUTRIEX RESEARCH: $25k → 8%E MILLCREEK COMMUNITY GARDEN: $15k → 8%E MILLCREEK COMMUNITY GARDEN: $12k → 8%E MILLCREEK COMMUNITY GARDEN: $8k → 8%E MILLCREEK COMMUNITY GARDEN: $6k → 8%GUADALUPE SCHOOL: $20k → 8%BREAKTHROUGH SOCCER: $64k → 8%SALT LAKE GRANITE CANYON AND DAVIS SCHOOLS AFTER SCHOOL PROJECTS: $62k → 8%BREAKTHROUGH SPORTS: $60k → 8%SALT LAKE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $57k → 8%AFTER SCHOOL PROJECTS: $52k → 8%PLANT BASE UTAH: $52k → 8%PLANT BASE UTAH: $50k → 8%SALT LAKE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $44k → 8%AFTER SCHOOL PROJECTS: $39k → 8%FOOD RELIEF PROJECT: $38k → 8%SIMON SAYS (HOPE): $30k → 8%SALT LAKE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $29k → 8%GRANITE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $24k → 8%SAVE GREAT SALT LAKE: $23k → 8%HARTLAND COMMUNITY 4 YOUTH: $20k → 8%CITY OF SO SALT LAKE AFTER SCHOOL: $19k → 8%REFUGEE OUTREACH: $18k → 8%CITY OF SO SALT LAKE AFTER SCHOOL: $18k → 8%SALT LAKE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $17k → 8%SAVE GREAT SALT LAKE: $14k → 8%SALT LAKE EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $12k → 8%MISCELLANEOUS: $11k → 8%COME BACK ALIVE URKRINE: $10k → 8%KIMBALE CHIMPANZE PROJECT: $10k → 8%MORAN EYE CENTER: $10k → 8%HARTLAND COMMUNITY 4 YOUTH: $10k → 8%ALL HANDS VOLUNTEERS: $10k → 8%CITY OF SO SALT LAKE AFTER SCHOOL: $9k → 8%TENNIS AND TUTORING: $9k → 8%REFUGEE RELIEF: $8k → 8%HEAL CHILD SKIN FOUNDATION: $7k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 28% of all-years giving ($535k)

7 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
India$249k · 8 grants
Myanmar$158k · 7 grants
Vietnam$84k · 8 grants
Uganda$30k · 3 grants
Peru$9k · 2 grants
Thailand$3k · 1 grant
Afghanistan$3k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 27 repeat orgs$468k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against -1% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
48

Total granted

$1.4M
$452k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
-1%

Still filing today

7%
13%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentHealthPhilanthropyEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    4× · 2021–2024 · $206k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    6× · 2019–2024 · $202k
  • SL
    Salt Lake Education Foundation
    5× · 2020–2024 · $159k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $64k
  • SL
    SALT LAKE GRANITE CANYON AND DAVIS SCHOOLS AFTER SCHOOL PROJECTS
    one grant, 2019 · $62k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $60k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Center for Economic Opportunity and Belonging

Our mission is to engage with communities and catalyze private, public, and philanthropic partnerships to remedy opportunity gaps in economic opportunity, education, health, and housing in Utah.

Community Improvement
2
Park City Education Foundation

Our mission is to fund and support educator-powered initiatives that inspire all Park City students to reach their academic and lifelong potential.

Education
3
Economic Development Corporation of Utah Foundation

To serve as a catalyst for quality job growth and increased capital investment in the state.

Community Improvement
4
Utah Valley Chamber of Commerce

Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.

—
5
Canyons School District Education Foundation

Canyons School District Education Foundation works in tandem with community and business partners to build support for public schools and to advance Canyons School Districts mission to help every student become college- and career-ready…

Education
6
Clean Slate Utah

To help people clear their criminal records and access opportunities. we will do this by: 1) spreading the word about utah's clean slate law to individuals with records, so they are aware of the law and its positive impact on their lives;…

Crime & Legal
7
Utah Safety Council

The mission of the Utah Safety Council is to save lives by promoting safety and health through education, services, and products.

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Utah Geological Foundation
—
9
University of Utah Foundation

Provide support to the University of Utah Growth Capital Partners Foundation in Charitable, Educational and Scientific purposes.

Philanthropy
10
Autism Foundation of Utah
Health
11
The Utah Schools for the Deaf and Blind Education Foundation

To provide resources and financial support to meet the unique need of the children and families served by the Utah Schools for the Deaf and Blind (USDB).

Education
12
English Skills Learning Center

Integrates and strengthens communities through English language, literacy, and skills-based education for adult learners, delivered using a combination of professional staff and trained community volunteers.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Utah Clean Energy Alliance Inc; the most unlike its peers is Salt Lake Sonics. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $205,507 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $202,280 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMYANMAR SCHOOL PROJECT: $148,254 · OtherMYANMAR SCHOOL PROJECTIndividual grant recipient: $101,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAFTER SCHOOL PROJECTS: $91,252 · OtherVIETNAM PROJECTS: $83,766 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $66,372 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $64,205 · OtherSALT LAKE GRANITE CANYON AND DAVIS SCHOOLS AFTER SCHOOL PROJECTS: $62,489 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $59,898 · Other+63 more: $645,105 · Other+63 moreSalt Lake Education Foundation: $158,803 · PhilanthropySalt Lake…Granite Education Foundation: $24,745 · EducationSALT LAKE SONICS: $1,200 · Youth DevelopmentANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC: $1,023 · HealthUTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC: $1,000 · Environment
Other$1,730,628Philanthropy$158,803Education$24,745Youth Development$1,200Health$1,023Environment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSalt Lake Education Foundation: $158,803 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetGranite Education Foundation: $24,745 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWASATCH ADAPTIVE SPORTS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CENTER UTAH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCentral Utah Enterprises: $3,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSALT LAKE SONICS: $1,200 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetANGEL FLIGHT WEST INC: $1,023 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUTAH CLEAN ENERGY ALLIANCE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Salt Lake Education Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Granite Education Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of UtahUT13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Utah · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dry Creek Charity funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dry Creek Charity. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dry Creek Charity?

    Find your warmest path to Dry Creek Charity through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dry Creek Charity’s filings →

    More from the funding graph