Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Drive for Life

DRIVE FOR LIFE foundation is organized for the purpose of receiving contributions in order to raise funds to support charitable organizations in the southwest michigan region.

$973k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$463k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Recreation & Sports$2.3MHealth$717kCommunity Improvement$587kEducation$369kPhilanthropy$155kReligion$40kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kArts & Culture$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 13 grants below total $908,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $973,491 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $64,991 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $124k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $309k
  • $250k+1 grant · $463k
$30,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$846k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPARTAN FUND$463,000
SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN FIRST - LEGACY COUNCIL$103,500
BRONCO ATHLETIC FUND$100,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$55,000
JOURNEY21$50,000
THE KIRK GIBSON FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S$35,000
ZEIGLER KALAMAZOO MARATHON$30,000
KALAMAZOO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
OCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$15,000
CHEFF THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER$14,000
GREAT LAKES CENTER FOR THE ARTS$10,000
WMU ATHLETICS$7,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF ELKHART COUNTY$6,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–21, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GRANT CARDONE FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%SHERMAN LAKE YMCA: $12k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.7M · 13 repeat orgs$456k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
17

Total granted

$3.7M
$291k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+3%

Still filing today

62%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $165k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SOUTHWEST MICHIGAN FIRST CORP
    6× · 2018–2024 · $607k · revenue +69%
  • CHEFF THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER
    6× · 2018–2024 · $87k · revenue +121%
  • MI
    MRC Industries Inc
    3× · 2018–2021 · $50k · revenue +54%

Funded once

  • ES
    EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +13%
  • FO
    FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +3%
  • WM
    WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY HOMER STRYKER MD SCHOOL OF MEDICINEgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +26%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
2
The Northern Michigan University Foundation

The nmu foundation will establish and foster relationships to generate resources that benefit the strategic goals of northern michigan university.

Education
3
Lake Michigan College Foundation

The mission of the lake michigan college foundation is to raise funds in support of lake michigan college and its students. the lake michigan college foundation is the main fund-raising organization of lake michigan college for the…

4
Michigan State Medical Society Foundation

To advance the field of health for the public good.

5
Mymichigan Health Foundation

The corporation is organized and shall be operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes by conducting or supporting activites exclusively for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the…

Health
6
Michigan Chamber Foundation

1) to plan and conduct nonpartisan public education programs regarding free enterprise, productivity and basic economic issues affecting the state of michigan.2) to establish and operate a leadership institute designed to provide promising…

Arts & Culture
7
Henry Ford Health Genesys Foundation

As one of the nation's leading integrated health systems, it is the mission of henry ford health system, a related entity of the filing organization, to improve people's lives through the excellence of the science and art of health care…

Health
8
Mid Michigan College Foundation

The mid michigan college foundation is a non-profit michigan corportion organized to receive and administer funds for charitable purposes in support of mid michigan college. the corporation is organized exclusively for the purpose of…

9
Michigan Science Center

The mission of the michigan science center is to inspire curious minds of all ages to discover, explore and appreciate science, technology, engineering and math in a creative, dynamic learning environment.

Education
10
Mymichigan Medical Center Midland

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
11
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

12
Mclaren Northern Michigan Foundation

To receive and administer funds to support the mission of mclaren northern michigan and support programs that enhance the well-being of the community.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Southwest Michigan First Corp and the most unlike its peers is Movember Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteady#5#10#8#3#9#20#14
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 17. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%11%<5yr13%19%5–10yr20%30%10–20yr15%11%20–35yr14%7%35–55yr18%22%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%2%<5yr13%7%5–10yr20%68%10–20yr15%3%20–35yr14%3%35–55yr18%18%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
12%
6,511/53,825

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/25
Grantees still filing
13/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY — $2,186,000 · OtherMICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITYBRONCO ATHLETIC FUND — $100,000 · OtherWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY — $99,000 · Other+16 more — $352,300 · Other+16 moreSOUTHWEST MICHIGAN FIRST CORP — $607,000 · Community ImprovementSOUTHWEST MICHIGA…COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR OCEANA COUNTY — $50,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY FOUNDAT…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $343,000 · HealthAMERICAN C…THE KIRK GIBSON CENTER FOR PARKINSON'S WELLNESS — $35,000 · HealthTHE KIRK G…+2 more — $20,020 · HealthEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION — $50,000 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $50,000 · EducationWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $45,320 · EducationWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY HOMER STRYKER MD SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $25,000 · EducationKALAMAZOO REGIONAL CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $10,000 · EducationJourney 21 Inc — $150,000 · Housing & ShelterOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 · PhilanthropyDRIVE FOR LIFE — $30,000 · PhilanthropyKALAMAZOO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 · PhilanthropyHARDYSTRONG FOUNDATION NFP — $7,500 · PhilanthropyMRC Industries Inc — $50,000 · Employment
Other$2,737,300Community Improvement$657,000Health$398,020Education$180,320Housing & Shelter$150,000Philanthropy$132,500Employment$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUTHWEST MICHIGAN FIRST CORP — $607,000 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $343,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJourney 21 Inc — $150,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCHEFF THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER — $86,700 over 6y, 3.1% of budgetOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMRC Industries Inc — $50,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetEVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR OCEANA COUNTY — $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $45,320 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE KIRK GIBSON CENTER FOR PARKINSON'S WELLNESS — $35,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetGreat Lakes Center for the Arts — $35,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetDRIVE FOR LIFE — $30,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetWESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY HOMER STRYKER MD SCHOOL OF MEDICINE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ELKHART COUNTY INC — $21,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKALAMAZOO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN REEF CHAPEL FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMOVEMBER FOUNDATION — $12,020 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSherman Lake YMCA Outdoor Center — $12,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKALAMAZOO REGIONAL CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGRANT CARDONE FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetASCENSION BORGESS HOSPITAL — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARDYSTRONG FOUNDATION NFP — $7,500 over 1y, 3.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Kalamazoo Community FoundationMI21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Kalamazoo Community Foundation · Tyler-Little Family Foundation · Harold and Grace Upjohn Foundation · Suzanne Upjohn Delano Parish Foundation · United Way of South Central Michigan · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Havirmill Foundation · Enna Foundation · Jim Gilmore Jr Foundation · Marvin and Rosalie Okun Foundation · Dorothy U Dalton Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Drive for Life funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    4get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph