Skip to content

· Private foundation

Drharold Rosenbaum Memorial Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36k
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$36k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Religion$187kEducation$19kHuman Services$12kHealth$6kFood & Nutrition$852Philanthropy$236Arts & Culture$180International$118Other$0
02FY2021 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$36,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$64k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FRIENDS OF ADERES HATORAH$36,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 82% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%CHASDEI NAOMI VSA FRIENDS: $190 → 16%CHASDEI NAOMI VSA FRIENDS: $118 → 16%TOMCHEI SHABBOS OF BERGEN COUNTY: $290 → 7%KOSHER TROOPS: $254 → 14%TIKVAH LAYALED FOUNDATION: $118 → 17%A TIME: $180 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $329 → 20%BONEI OLAM: $172 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$159k · 18 repeat orgs$66k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2021, 17 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
75

Total granted

$159k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+82%

Still filing today

39%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2021, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyReligionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF ADERES HATORAH INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $139k · revenue +63%
  • BO
    Bonei Olam Inc
    2× · 2018–2019 · $501 · revenue +195%
  • CL
    CHAI LIFELINE INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $324 · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • RY
    ROSENBAUM YESHIVA OF NJ
    one grant, 2018 · $11k
  • YM
    YESHIVA MESIVTA CHAIM BERLIN
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Chabad Lametayel Inc

encourage and facilitate the observance of traditional orthodox Jewish practices around the world.

—
4
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
6
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
7
Sherit Isroel
—
8
Ahavas Torah V'chesed
Philanthropy
9
Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc
Philanthropy
10
Bnei Moshe
Philanthropy
11
Tal Hashamayim Foundation
Religion
12
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Agudath Israel of America; the most unlike its peers is Chasday Naomi Usa Friends. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
23/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF ADERES HATORAH INC: $139,127 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF ADERES HATORAH INC+2 more: $336 · PhilanthropyROSENBAUM YESHIVA OF NJ: $11,000 · OtherROSENBAUM YESHIVA OF NJYESHIVA MESIVTA CHAIM BERLIN: $10,000 · OtherYESHIVA MESIVTA CHAIM BERLINYESHIVA TORAS CHAIM: $7,121 · OtherYESHIVA TORAS CHAIMIndividual grant recipient: $6,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR WELFARE & ED: $6,000 · OtherAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR WELFARE & EDCONGREGATION AHAVAS DOVID INC: $3,250 · Other+67 more: $30,911 · Other+67 moreHEICHAL HATORAH: $5,000 · EducationTALMUDIC RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY: $478 · EducationCOMMUNITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND OF TEANECK: $200 · Education+1 more: $118 · EducationKEREN EZER LNEFESH: $2,500 · HealthPROJECT YECHI INC: $360 · HealthCHAI LIFELINE INC: $324 · HealthFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $306 · Health+1 more: $118 · HealthBonei Olam Inc: $501 · Human ServicesCHASDAY NAOMI USA FRIENDS: $308 · Human ServicesTOMCHEI SHABBOS OF BERGEN COUNTY: $290 · Human ServicesKOSHER TROOPS INC: $254 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $180 · Human ServicesTIKVAH LAYELED FOUNDATION INC: $118 · Human ServicesMIKVAH USA INC: $118 · ReligionTORAT REVA YERUSHALAYIM: $118 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD YEMIN INC: $200 · International
Philanthropy$139,463Other$74,782Education$5,796Health$3,608Human Services$1,651Religion$236International$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF ADERES HATORAH INC: $139,127 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetHEICHAL HATORAH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN EZER LNEFESH: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVA OF NORTH JERSEY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $501 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTALMUDIC RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY: $478 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT YECHI INC: $360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $324 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF YAD SARAH INC: $306 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS OF BERGEN COUNTY: $290 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOSHER TROOPS INC: $254 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOHR NOSSON INC: $236 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD YEMIN INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEYLIM LEV LACHIM: $162 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIKVAH USA INC: $118 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTIKVAH LAYELED FOUNDATION INC: $118 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $118 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV MACHON ORA A NJ NON- PROFIT CORPORATION: $118 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF ADERES HATORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds HEICHAL HATORAH ↗
  • Who funds KEREN EZER LNEFESH ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA OF NORTH JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds Bonei Olam Inc ↗
  • Who funds TALMUDIC RESEARCH CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT YECHI INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY30.3× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Fjc · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Moses and Miriam Vogel Charitable Foundation Tr · Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc · The Jmg Foundation · The Eva & Mordy Rothberg Family Foundation Inc · Granit Foundation · The Arthur & Joyce Fein Family Foundation · Regina Goldwasser Foundation · The Fishoff Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Drharold Rosenbaum Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Drharold Rosenbaum Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Heichal Hatorah: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Drharold Rosenbaum Memorial’s filings →

More from the funding graph