Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dreitzer Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$165k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$1.6MEducation$1.5MCivil Rights$1.4MHealth$1.1MYouth Development$875kCrime & Legal$590kArts & Culture$470kHousing & Shelter$335kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $210k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $1.0M
$65,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$6.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ETHICS IN EDUCATION NETWORK INC$165,000
NY COMMON PANTRY$120,000
NEW ROOTS INSTITUTE$120,000
FEMINIST MAJORITY FOUNDATION$105,000
EQUALITY NOW$100,000
ISO AT THIRD STREET$75,000
CAMP VACAMUS$70,000
FISTULA FOUNDATION$70,000
INNOCENCE PROJECT$65,000
JASA$60,000
BROTHERHOODSISTER SOL$60,000
CALVARY HOSPITAL$40,000
NORTHERN NEW JERSEY SANCTUARY COALITION$40,000
INSTITUTE FOR HUMANE EDUCATION$40,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NY$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $540k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORTHERN NEW JERSEY SANCTUARY COALITION: $40k → 16%NORTHERN NEW JERSEY SANCTUARY COALITION: $35k → 16%NORTHERN NEW JERSEY SANCTUARY COALITION: $25k → 16%NORTHERN NEW JERSEY SANCTUARY COALI: $25k → 16%NORTHERN NEW JERSEY SANCTUARY COALI: $25k → 16%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $65k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $65k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $50k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $50k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $50k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $50k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $20k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $20k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $20k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.0M · 22 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
2

Total granted

$8.0M
$35k

Still filing today

68%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionHuman ServicesEducationInternationalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EI
    ETHICS IN EDUCATION NETWORK INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $1.2M · revenue +33% · 99% of their budget
  • NR
    New Roots Institute
    8× · 2017–2025 · $800k · revenue +281%
  • NY
    NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $740k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • KC
    KINGS COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Nijc Nfp

The National Immigrant Justice Center (NIJC) is a leader in advancing immigrant rights through its unique strategy drawing on its legal services to promote legal reform through litigation, advocacy and strategic communications.

Crime & Legal
2
Women Donors Network

Women donors network advances a just, equitable, and sustainable world through the power of philanthropy, women's leadership, and collective and individual action.

Philanthropy
3
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
4
Fund for Justice

Fund for Justice is a nationally connected social impact research and advocacy organization that works to achieve fundamental, systemic reform by addressing policies and practicies that prevent individuals from reaching their full…

Crime & Legal
5
Justice Innovation Inc

The center for justice innovation is a non-profit organization that works to create a fair, effective, and humane justice system and build strong, thriving communities.

Crime & Legal
6
Equal Justice Center

The Equal Justice Center is a non-profit law firm and employment justice organization which empowers low-income families, workers, and communities to achieve fair treatment in the workplace, in the justice system, and in our shared society…

Civil Rights
7
Legal Services Nyc

Legal services nyc is a non-profit organization that provides free civil legal assistance to low-income people in new york city. a community-based organization serving more than 100,000 people annually, lsnyc is the nation's largest…

Crime & Legal
8
Guernica Centre for InternationalJustice

The Guernica Centre for International Justice represents the interests of victims in national and international legal proceedings, putting in place transnational accountability strategies that seek to maximize the protection of victims'…

International
9
International Bridges to Justice

In recognition of the fundamental principles of the universal declaration of human rights, international bridges to justice (ibj) is dedicated to protecting the basic legal rights of ordinary citizens in developing countries. specifically,…

Crime & Legal
10
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
11
Faith in New York

The mission of Faith in New York is to equip congregations and develop grassroots leaders to move significant public policy change that supports our leaders vision of a more just New York City with excellent public schools, violence-free…

Religion
12
International Network for the Reduction of Abortion Discrimination and Stigma

The International Network for the Reduction of Abortion Discrimination and Stigma (inroads) builds cross-movement collective power, provides flexible resources, and strengthens movements across the global abortion justice ecosystem to…

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lawyers Alliance for New York; the most unlike its peers is Northern New Jersey Sanctuary Coalition Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
14/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FEMINIST MAJORITY FOUNDATION: $545,000 · OtherFEMINIST MAJORITY FOUNDATIONINTERSCHOOL ORCHESTRAS CITY OF NY: $395,000 · OtherINTERSCHOOL ORCHESTRAS CITY OF NYIndividual grant recipient: $225,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPLANNED PARENTHOOD FED: $210,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDLAWYERS ALLIANCE FOR NEW YORK: $160,000 · OtherLAWYERS ALLIANCE FOR NEW YORKIndividual grant recipient: $105,000 · OtherTHE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC: $390,000 · OtherTHE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INCJASA CORPORATION: $335,000 · OtherJASA CORPORATIONINSTITUTE FOR HUMANE EDUCATION: $200,000 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR HUMANE EDUCATION+7 more: $315,000 · Other+7 moreNew Roots Institute: $800,000 · Food & NutritionNew Roots InstituteNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $740,000 · Food & NutritionNEW YORK COMMON PANTR…ETHICS IN EDUCATION NETWORK INC: $1,225,000 · EducationETHICS IN EDUCATI…The Fistula Foundation: $410,000 · HealthThe Fistul…CALVARY HOSPITAL INC: $300,000 · HealthCALVARY HO…BENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $75,000 · HealthBENEVOLENT…Equality Now Inc: $725,000 · InternationalEquality N…THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $390,000 · Human ServicesNORTHERN NEW JERSEY SANCTUARY COALITION INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesHANDS IN FOR YOUTH INC: $410,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,880,000Food & Nutrition$1,540,000Education$1,225,000Health$785,000International$725,000Human Services$540,000Recreation & Sports$410,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetETHICS IN EDUCATION NETWORK INC: $1,225,000 over 8y, 99% of budgetNew Roots Institute: $800,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $740,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetEquality Now Inc: $725,000 over 9y, 1.6% of budgetFEMINIST MAJORITY FOUNDATION: $545,000 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetHANDS IN FOR YOUTH INC: $410,000 over 9y, 3.5% of budgetThe Fistula Foundation: $410,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetTHE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC: $390,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $390,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetJASA CORPORATION: $335,000 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetCALVARY HOSPITAL INC: $300,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR HUMANE EDUCATION: $200,000 over 5y, 5.1% of budgetLAWYERS ALLIANCE FOR NEW YORK: $160,000 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetNORTHERN NEW JERSEY SANCTUARY COALITION INC: $150,000 over 5y, 29% of budgetBENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ETHICS IN EDUCATION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds New Roots Institute ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY ↗
  • Who funds Equality Now Inc ↗
  • Who funds FEMINIST MAJORITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HANDS IN FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds The Fistula Foundation ↗
  • Who funds THE BROTHERHOOD SISTER SOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds JASA CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CALVARY HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR HUMANE EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds LAWYERS ALLIANCE FOR NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN NEW JERSEY SANCTUARY COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds BENEVOLENT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dreitzer Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dreitzer Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Hands in for Youth Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dreitzer Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Dreitzer Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dreitzer’s filings →

More from the funding graph