Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dreambridge Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$24k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$8k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Health$89kHuman Services$22kYouth Development$18kEducation$7kPhilanthropy$2kCrime & Legal$2kFood & Nutrition$1kReligion$400Other$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,010
Median grant
4
States reached
$7k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEEN CHALLENGE OF NH$8,000
Individual grant recipient$5,700
SOPHIA'S FUND$5,000
ARIA COVEY FOUNDATION$1,554
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$1,010
Individual grant recipient$1,010
UPPER VALLEY HAVEN$516
WINDHAM HELPING HANDS$500
BOSTON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%WINDHAM HELPING HANDS: $1k → 5%SHEPHERDS PANTRY: $1k → 5%WINDHAM HELPING HANDS: $500 → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

54%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$77k · 6 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

$77k
$57k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+25%

Still filing today

83%
11%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UV
    UPPER VALLEY HAVEN
    5× · 2020–2024 · $3k · revenue +28%
  • CF
    CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k · revenue +22%
  • WH
    WINDHAMS HELPING HANDS INC
    2× · 2020–2024 · $2k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • JH
    JIM HARVEY FAMILY
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $12k
  • CF
    COCO FAMILY GO FUND ME
    one grant, 2020 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
2
Bank of New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
3
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
4
Childhood Cancer Lifeline

To empower New Hampshire families who are coping with childhood cancer by providing knowledge, resources, assistance, and hope.

Health
5
Little Harbour Charitable Foundation

To benefit Seacoast NH charities

6
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
7
Catholic Medical Center

The heart of Catholic Medical Center is to carry out Christ's healing ministry by offering health, healing, and hope to every individual who seeks our care.

Health
8
Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Northern New Hampshire Healthcare Collaborative, Inc. will ensure access to quality care within the communities in which our patients live, provide local and high quality care with positive outcomes to our patients in Coos County while…

9
Home Health and Hospice Care

Home Health and Hospice Care provides trusted patient centered services that enhance each individual's independence and quality throughout life.

Health
10
Laura Norton Fund
11
Concord Hospital Inc

Concord Hospital is a charitable organization which exists to meet the health needs of individuals within the communities it serves.

Health
12
Foundation for Healthy Communities

The mission of the Foundation for Healthy Communities is to build healthier communities for all by leading partnerships, fostering collaboration, and creating innovative solutions to advance health and health care.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Hampshire Charitable Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JIM HARVEY FAMILY — $30,000 · OtherJIM HARVEY FAMILYTEEN CHALLENGE OF NH — $18,100 · OtherTEEN CHALLENGE OF NHIndividual grant recipient — $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $5,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOCO FAMILY GO FUND ME — $5,000 · OtherCOCO FAMILY GO FUND MEMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY — $5,000 · OtherMULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY+6 more — $7,755 · Other+6 moreSOPHIA'S FUND INC — $46,200 · HealthSOPHIA'S FUND INCCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $2,010 · Health+1 more — $250 · HealthARIA COVEY FOUNDATION INC — $6,554 · EducationWINDHAMS HELPING HANDS INC — $1,500 · Human ServicesSHEPHERDS PANTRY INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesNew Hampshire Charitable Foundation — $2,060 · Philanthropy
Other$83,555Health$48,460Education$6,554Human Services$2,500Philanthropy$2,060

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOPHIA'S FUND INC — $46,200 over 4y, 41% of budgetARIA COVEY FOUNDATION INC — $6,554 over 4y, 3.2% of budgetUPPER VALLEY HAVEN — $2,516 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNew Hampshire Charitable Foundation — $2,060 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $2,010 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWINDHAMS HELPING HANDS INC — $1,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSHEPHERDS PANTRY INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SOPHIA'S FUND INC
  • Who funds ARIA COVEY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds UPPER VALLEY HAVEN
  • Who funds New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WINDHAMS HELPING HANDS INC
  • Who funds SHEPHERDS PANTRY INC
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dreambridge Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 38%
  • Upper Valley Haven38% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dreambridge Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Dreambridge Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph