Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dr Michael & Sophia Yarborough Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$545kEducation$288kReligion$56kAnimals$50kFood & Nutrition$33kEnvironment$10kPhilanthropy$3kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$739k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY$30,000
FOOD BANK OF EASTERN NC$15,000
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $140) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LAW ENFORCEMENT CHAPLAINCY FOR SOUTH CAROLINA: $140 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$955k · 9 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$955k
$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+20%

Still filing today

67%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthAnimalsArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE HILL CENTER INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $171k · revenue +44%
  • Davidson College
    7× · 2017–2023 · $63k · revenue +42%
  • TT
    THE TELLURIDE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2023 · $8k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • SM
    SAMARITAN MEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2017 · $16k · revenue +20%
  • BI
    BAY ISLANDS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
  • HEALING TRANSITIONS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +116%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Carolinas Center for Medical Excellence Found ation
Health
2
Mountain Area Health Education Center Inc

The nc ahec program provides and supports educational activities and services with a focus on primary care in rural communities and those with less access to resources to recruit, train, and retain the workforce needed to create a healthy…

Education
3
Wingate University

The mission of wingate university is to develop educated, ethical, and productive global citizens. following its judeo-christian heritage, the university seeks to cultivate the following in its students: knowledge, faith, and service.

Education
4
Unc Health Foundation Inc

At unc health foundation, we inspire philanthropic support for unc health and unc school of medicine that transforms healthcare and provides hope to the people of north carolina and communities around the world.

Education
5
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
6
Methodist University Inc

The purpose of methodist university is to provide an undergraduate and graduate education firmly grounded in the liberal arts tradition, that nurtures moral values & ethical decision-making; to provide distinctive professional & graduate…

Education
7
Presbyterian College

The compelling purpose of presbyterian college, as a church-related college, is to develop within the framework of christian faith the mental, physical, moral, and spiritual capacities of each student in (see schedule o)

Housing & Shelter
8
Brevard College Corporation

Brevard college is committed to an experiential liberal arts education that encourages personal growth and inspires artistic, intellectual, and social action.

Education
9
Greensboro College

Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

Education
10
Endicott College

Endicott college offers students a vibrant academic environment that remains true to its founding principle of integrating professional and liberal arts with experiential learning. for more information see schedule o.

Education
11
Edward Via Virginia College of Osteopathic Medicine

The mission of the edward via college of osteopathic medicine (vcom) is to prepare globally-minded, community-focused physicians to meet the needs of rural and medically underserved populations and promote research to improve human health.

Education
12
North Carolina Institute for Constitutional Law
Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Healing Transitions Inc and the most unlike its peers is Law Enforcement Chaplaincy for South Carolina. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MAYO CLINIC FOUNDATION — $520,000 · OtherMAYO CLINIC FOUNDATIONFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $55,500 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHFOOD BANK OF EASTERN NC — $32,500 · Other+2 more — $26,000 · OtherTHE HILL CENTER INC — $171,000 · EducationTHE HILL CENTER INCDavidson College — $62,500 · EducationDavidson CollegeMEREDITH COLLEGE — $54,250 · EducationMEREDITH COLLEGEBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $50,000 · AnimalsTHE TELLURIDE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $7,500 · HealthHEALING TRANSITIONS INC — $1,500 · HealthNORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,500 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL INC — $2,000 · Arts & CultureLaw Enforcement Chaplaincy for South Carolina — $140 · Human Services
Other$634,000Education$287,750Animals$50,000Health$9,000Philanthropy$2,500Arts & Culture$2,000Human Services$140

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE HILL CENTER INC — $171,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetDavidson College — $62,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEREDITH COLLEGE — $54,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY — $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN MEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC — $16,000 over 1y, 5.3% of budgetTHE TELLURIDE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHEALING TRANSITIONS INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE HILL CENTER INC
  • Who funds Davidson College
  • Who funds MEREDITH COLLEGE
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds SAMARITAN MEDICAL OUTREACH MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds THE TELLURIDE MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NORTH CAROLINA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds COMMUNITY MUSIC SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds HEALING TRANSITIONS INC
  • Who funds Law Enforcement Chaplaincy for South Carolina

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dr Michael & Sophia Yarborough Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph