Skip to content
Dr Henry P & M Page Durkee Laughlin Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Dr Henry P & M Page Durkee Laughlin Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$195k
Granted FY2025still arriving
33
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$61k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$242kEducation$200kHealth$149kHousing & Shelter$99kYouth Development$87kHuman Services$72kReligion$71kAnimals$8kOther$0
02FY2025 · 33 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $70k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $64k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $61k
$2,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$4.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDRENS BEACH HOUSE$61,182
CONCORDIA ACADEMY$14,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF WASHINGTON$10,000
VHC HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$10,000
BROOKE'S HOUSE$10,000
LANDON SCHOOL$10,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
NOTE IN THE POCKET$5,000
SEARCH FOR COMMON GROUND$5,000
RACH OF WASHINGTON COUNTY$5,000
METHODIST HOME FOR CHILDERN$5,000
MICHIGAN LAW SCHOOL$5,000
NORTH HEIGHTS CHRISTIA ACADEMY$4,000
CASE$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $120k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%METHODIST HOME FOR CHILDERN: $5k → 8%HOSTAGE US: $11k → 6%MISSION OF MERCY: $10k → 11%NOTE IN THE POCKET: $5k → 8%HOSTAGE US: $5k → 6%FUTURE LINK: $3k → 8%MISSION OF MERCY: $11k → 6%MISSION OF MERCY: $10k → 6%MISSION OF MERCY: $10k → 6%HEARTLY HOUSE: $5k → 6%CENTRO HISPANO DE FREDERICK: $13k → 6%FREDERICK HEALTH HOSPICE: $12k → 6%CENTRO HISPANO DE FREDERICK: $8k → 6%CENTRO HISPANO DE FREDERICK: $7k → 6%HOSPICE OF FREDERICK COUNTY: $5k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
MI
NJ
CA
KY
VA
MD
DE
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$843k · 41 repeat orgs$198k to everyone else

41 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 34 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
21

Total granted

$843k
$85k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+44%

Still filing today

59%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthHousing & ShelterAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF FREDERICK COUNTY INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $242k · revenue +11%
  • CB
    CHILDREN'S BEACH HOUSE INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $64k · revenue +23%
  • AF
    ADVOCATES FOR HOMELESS FAMILIES INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $45k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $30k
  • SS
    SPANISH SPEAKING COMM OF MD
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • BS
    BEYOND SHELTER
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Chamber of Commerce of Frederick County Inc

Connecting businesses and the community through leadership, advocacy and education.

—
2
Frederick Health Hospital Inc

To positively impact the well-being of every individual in our community.

Health
3
The Frederick County Humane Society Inc

The organization is dedicated to providing affordable services, resources and programs to help responsible pet owners keep their pets healthy, happy and in life-long homes.

Animals
4
Maryland Independent College & University Association Inc

Serving the interests of independent higher education and supporting the work of campus leaders throughout the state of maryland.

—
5
Healthcare Access Maryland Inc

We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.

Health
6
Family Health Center of Marshfield Inc

The mission of family health center of marshfield, inc. is to provide access to high quality health care services for the underserved and to enhance the health of our communities.

Health
7
Frederick County Association of Realtors

The association provides and promotes realtors education and cooperation. it promotes trust and confidence through the support of approximately 1,200 members.

—
8
Howard County Chamber of Commerce

To represent the business community of howard county, maryland

—
9
Hilbert College

Hilbert college is an independent institution of higher learning that embraces its catholic franciscan heritage and values. students from diverse backgrounds are educated in liberal arts and professional programs to become informed…

Education
10
Frederick Health Medical Group Llc

To positively impact the well-being of every individual in our community.

Health
11
First Maryland Disability Trust Inc

To enhance the quality of life, autonomy and dignity of marylanders with disabilities by offering cost effective trust services to protect, manage and use trust assets for beneficiaries while preserving eligibility for public and private…

Human Services
12
University of Maryland Facultyphysicians Inc

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland, school of medicine, administrative support services are provided to the physician practices of the university of maryland, including but not limited to information technology,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Frederick Health Hospice Inc; the most unlike its peers is Club 164 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 88 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
26/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S BEACH HOUSE INC: $64,182 · OtherCHILDREN'S BEACH HOUSE INCFAITH HOUSE: $35,500 · OtherFAITH HOUSEHEARLTY HOUSE: $34,500 · OtherHEARLTY HOUSEIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLITERACY COUNCIL OF FREDERICK COUNTY INC: $26,000 · OtherLITERACY COUNCIL OF FREDERICK COUNTY INCSTEADFAST: $25,000 · OtherSTEADFASTIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+56 more: $188,106 · Other+56 moreUNITED WAY OF FREDERICK COUNTY INC: $241,530 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF FREDERICK CO…MISSION OF MERCY INC: $41,000 · Human ServicesMISSION OF ME…CENTRO HISPANO DE FREDERICK INC: $28,000 · Human ServicesCENTRO HISPAN…Frederick Health Hospice Inc: $17,000 · Human ServicesFrederick Hea…HOSTAGE US INC: $16,000 · Human ServicesHOSTAGE US IN…The Methodist Home for Children Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesHEARTLY HOUSE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesNOTE IN THE POCKET INC: $5,000 · Human Services+1 more: $2,500 · Human ServicesADVOCATES FOR HOMELESS FAMILIES INC: $45,000 · Housing & ShelterADVOCATES…FREDERICK RESCUE MISSION INC: $40,000 · Housing & ShelterFREDERICK…HURWITZ BREAST CANCER FUND INC: $41,500 · HealthBROOKES HOUSE INC: $16,000 · HealthFrederick Health Inc: $8,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY FREE CLINIC INC: $8,000 · HealthCINDY'S FUND INC: $3,000 · Health+1 more: $2,500 · HealthLANDON SCHOOL: $10,000 · EducationThe Trustees of Princeton University: $10,000 · EducationHOOD COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationMCDANIEL COLLEGE INC: $6,000 · EducationWASHINGTON COLLEGE: $6,000 · EducationFairfax Library Foundation: $3,000 · Education+1 more: $1,500 · EducationBEYOND SHELTER FREDERICK INC: $40,500 · Religion
Other$428,288Philanthropy$241,530Human Services$119,500Housing & Shelter$85,000Health$79,000Education$46,500Religion$40,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF FREDERICK COUNTY INC: $241,530 over 2y, 11% of budgetCHILDREN'S BEACH HOUSE INC: $64,182 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetADVOCATES FOR HOMELESS FAMILIES INC: $45,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetHURWITZ BREAST CANCER FUND INC: $41,500 over 6y, 4.3% of budgetMISSION OF MERCY INC: $41,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBEYOND SHELTER FREDERICK INC: $40,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFREDERICK RESCUE MISSION INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRO HISPANO DE FREDERICK INC: $28,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetLITERACY COUNCIL OF FREDERICK COUNTY INC: $26,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetFrederick Health Hospice Inc: $17,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHOSTAGE US INC: $16,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetBROOKES HOUSE INC: $16,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLANDON SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOOD COLLEGE: $10,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFrederick Health Inc: $8,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FREE CLINIC INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMCDANIEL COLLEGE INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON COLLEGE: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Methodist Home for Children Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTLY HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFairfax Library Foundation: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOPERATION PAWS FOR HOMES INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCINDY'S FUND INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSOPHIE AND MADIGANS PLAYGROUND INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetFUTURE LINK INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DELAPLAINE ARTS CENTER INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGETRACKS INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF FREDERICK CO: $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF FREDERICK COUNTY INC: $1,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDOWNTOWN FREDERICK PARTNERSHIP INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JOHN'S FAMILY SHELTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF WASHINGTON COUNTY INCORPORATED: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTIANA CARE HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF FREDERICK COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S BEACH HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATES FOR HOMELESS FAMILIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HURWITZ BREAST CANCER FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION OF MERCY INC ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND SHELTER FREDERICK INC ↗
  • Who funds FREDERICK RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRO HISPANO DE FREDERICK INC ↗
  • Who funds LITERACY COUNCIL OF FREDERICK COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Frederick Health Hospice Inc ↗
  • Who funds HOSTAGE US INC ↗
  • Who funds BROOKES HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds LANDON SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds HOOD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Frederick Health Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FREE CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds MCDANIEL COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds The Methodist Home for Children Inc ↗
  • Who funds HEARTLY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds NOTE IN THE POCKET INC ↗
  • Who funds SEARCH FOR COMMON GROUND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ausherman Family Foun…The Community Foundat…Delaplaine Foundation…Ausherman Family TrustWilliam E Cross Found…Nora Roberts Foundati…Joseph D Baker Fund I…G Frank Thomas Fdn In…United Way of Frederi…The Helen J Serini Fo…Greater Washington Co…America's Charities
Ausherman Family FoundationMD38.6× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ausherman Family Foundation · The Community Foundation of Frederick County Maryland Inc · Delaplaine Foundation Inc · Ausherman Family Trust · William E Cross Foundation Inc · Nora Roberts Foundation · Joseph D Baker Fund Inc · G Frank Thomas Fdn Inc Main · United Way of Frederick County Inc · The Helen J Serini Foundation Inc · Greater Washington Community Foundation · America's Charities

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dr Henry P & M Page Durkee Laughlin Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dr Henry P & M Page Durkee Laughlin Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Christiana Care Health System Inc: 43% of income from government
  • Heartly House Inc: 33% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
  • The Delaplaine Arts Center Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Children's Beach House Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Downtown Frederick Partnership Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Washington College: 0% of income from government
  • Mcdaniel College Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 88 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dr Henry P & M Page Durkee Laughlin’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home