Skip to content
Dr David M Mahalick Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Dr David M Mahalick Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$42k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0184% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$84kEducation$37kFood & Nutrition$29kReligion$17kHuman Services$11kPublic Safety & Disaster$8kAnimals$4kArts & Culture$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
$1,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$434k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$30,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$5,000
CONGREGATION OF JUDEA REFORMED$1,500
TEWKSBURY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
MANESTREAM$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 48% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%Breast Cancer Research Fdn: $3k → 17%Alfred University Fund: $2k → 19%Planned Parenthood: $2k → 14%Trinity College Fund: $2k → 11%Quinnipiac University Fund: $2k → 12%CONGREGATION OF JUDEA REFORMED: $2k → 11%Denison University: $2k → 10%ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION: $5k → 14%Tewksbury First Aid Rescue: $3k → 4%Foundation for Morristown Medical Center: $1k → 4%DASACC of Warren County: $2k → 7%RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30k → 8%Overlook Foundation: $1k → 10%NJ Psychological Association Fdn: $3k → 16%Chesapeake Chamber Music: $1k → 10%LEBANON FIRE DEPARTMENT: $2k → 10%Breast Cancer Research Fdn: $3k → 17%Congregation of Judea Reformed: $1k → 11%Pulmonary Fibrosis Fdn: $2k → 14%TEWKSBURY TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPT: $2k → 4%Community Foundation of NJ: $1k → 4%Somerset Health Care Foundation: $3k → 5%DASACC of Warren County: $2k → 7%Overlook Foundation: $1k → 10%NJ Psychological Association Fdn: $2k → 16%Chesapeake Chamber Music: $1k → 10%Breast Cancer Research Fdn: $2k → 17%Congregation of Judea Reformed: $1k → 11%CALIFON FIRE DEPARTMENT: $1k → 4%Foundation for Morristown Medical Center: $1k → 4%Somerset Health Care Foundation: $1k → 5%Vibrant Emotional Health: $1k → 17%Alzheimers Association: $2k → 14%Tewksbury Police Dept: $1k → 4%Foundation for Morristown Medical Center: $1k → 4%Community Food Bank of NJ: $12k → 10%Vibrant Emotional Health: $1k → 17%Alzheimers Association: $2k → 14%Tewksbury Police Dept: $1k → 4%Saint Bridgid Church: $11k → 5%Community Food Bank of NJ: $9k → 10%Alzheimers Association: $2k → 14%Saint Bridgid Church: $2k → 5%Community Food Bank of NJ: $5k → 10%St Huberts Animal Welfare Center: $2k → 4%South Branch EMS: $2k → 4%Oldwick Fire Dept: $2k → 4%MANESTREAM: $2k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
WA
IL
NY
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
MD
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$164k · 30 repeat orgs$46k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

30 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
15

Total granted

$164k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+1%

Still filing today

50%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $34k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’25
HealthEducationPublic Safety & DisasterFood & NutritionArts & CultureHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc
    3× · 2021–2023 · $26k · revenue +1%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    4× · 2021–2025 · $11k · revenue +13%
  • THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $8k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $2k
  • AU
    Alfred University Fund
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
  • QU
    Quinnipiac University Fund
    one grant, 2021 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Humc Medical Observation Pa

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

—
2
Humc Cardiovascular Partners Pc

The organization provides high quality medical care to the community that it serves and specifically provides cardiology & related professional medical services in conjunction with hmh hospitals corp.

Health
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
Hmh Hospitals Corporation

The organization is committed to providing the full spectrum of life-enhancing care and services to create and sustain healthy, vibrant communities. please refer to schedule h, part vi, question 5 for the organization's community benefit…

Health
5
Uvmc Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at upper valley medical center by raising community support for programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Philanthropy
6
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
7
Bridgton Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

Health
8
Jfk Medical Associates Pa

Jfk medical associates, p.a. is committed to excellence in providing quality and compassionate healthcare services to diverse communities.

Health
9
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Hackensack Specialty Care Associates Pc

To serve as the physician services component of a tax-exempt healthcare delivery network and to thereby promote, support & further the charitable purposes, programs & services of hmh hospitals corp.

Health
12
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Somerset Health Care Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tewksbury First Aid & Rescue Squad. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 50 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
15/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Rutgers University - Pedriatrics: $23,000 · OtherRutgers University - PedriatricsRutgers University - Neurology: $15,000 · OtherRutgers University - NeurologySaint Bridgid Church: $13,000 · OtherSaint Bridgid ChurchNJ Psychological Association Fdn: $4,500 · OtherPlanned Parenthood: $4,500 · OtherSOMERSET HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · OtherDASACC of Warren County: $4,000 · OtherCONGREGATION OF JUDEA REFORMED: $4,000 · Other+28 more: $40,050 · Other+28 moreRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · EducationRUTGERS UNIVERSIT…DENISON UNIVERSITY: $1,500 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $25,950 · Food & NutritionCommunity Foo…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $11,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S …TEWKSBURY FIRST AID & RESCUE SQUAD: $3,500 · HealthTEWKSBURY FI…Foundation for Morristown Medical Center: $3,000 · HealthFoundation f…OVERLOOK FOUNDATION: $2,500 · HealthOVERLOOK FOU…PULMONARY FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $2,500 · HealthPULMONARY FI…GOOD GRIEF INC: $1,500 · HealthGOOD GRIEF I…THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $7,950 · Public Safety & DisasterBERNARDSVILLE FIRE COMPANY: $500 · Public Safety & DisasterJERSEY BATTERED WOMEN'S SERVICE INC: $5,500 · Human ServicesCHESAPEAKE CHAMBER MUSIC INC T/A CHESAPEAKE MUSIC: $2,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$112,050Education$32,000Food & Nutrition$25,950Health$24,000Public Safety & Disaster$8,450Human Services$5,500Arts & Culture$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc: $25,950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $11,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $7,950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetJERSEY BATTERED WOMEN'S SERVICE INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOMERSET HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSHARE OUR STRENGTH: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEWKSBURY FIRST AID & RESCUE SQUAD: $3,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation for Morristown Medical Center: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMane Stream Inc: $3,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOVERLOOK FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPULMONARY FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHESAPEAKE CHAMBER MUSIC INC T/A CHESAPEAKE MUSIC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGOOD GRIEF INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFON FIRE COMPANY INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBERNARDSVILLE FIRE COMPANY: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVERITANS CLUB INC: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Of New Jersey Inc ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JERSEY BATTERED WOMEN'S SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOMERSET HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OUR STRENGTH ↗
  • Who funds TEWKSBURY FIRST AID & RESCUE SQUAD ↗
  • Who funds THE MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Morristown Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds Mane Stream Inc ↗
  • Who funds OVERLOOK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PULMONARY FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHESAPEAKE CHAMBER MUSIC INC T/A CHESAPEAKE MUSIC ↗
  • Who funds GOOD GRIEF INC ↗
  • Who funds CALIFON FIRE COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dr David M Mahalick Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dr David M Mahalick Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Veritans Club Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Jersey Battered Women's Service Inc: 40% of income from government
  • Chesapeake Chamber Music Inc T/a Chesapeake Music: 2% of income from government
  • Mane Stream Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 50 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dr David M Mahalick’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home