Skip to content

· Private foundation

DR Bridge of Hope

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$23k
Granted FY2026still arriving
3
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2023.

Animals$244kCrime & Legal$86kHuman Services$82kEmployment$64kHealth$30kArts & Culture$6kFood & Nutrition$5kEducation$4kOther$0
02FY2026 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$9,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$713k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Down Syndrome Northern Nevada Network$13,000
For Pets Sake$9,000
Note-Able Music Therapy Services$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Neighbor Network of Northern Nevada: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of DR Bridge of Hope’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

DR Bridge of Hopelessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$623k · 9 repeat orgs$64k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2026, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
10

Total granted

$623k
$51k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
+31%

Still filing today

33%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Human ServicesAnimalsEducationCrime & LegalArts & CultureEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC
    3× · 2018–2021 · $77k · revenue +121%
  • TN
    THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE
    2× · 2020–2021 · $75k · revenue +53%
  • NM
    NOTE-ABLE MUSIC THERAPY SERVICES
    3× · 2019–2026 · $11k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • CA
    Center Adaptive Rd
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • NA
    NOAH'S ANIMAL HOUSE FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue +31%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Cape Abilities Inc

To serve individuals with disabilities by educating, counseling, providing residential, social, therapeutic and employment supports, so as to empower them to achieve meaningful and valued roles in society.

Human Services
2
National Center for Equine Facilitated Therapy

National center for equine facilitated training is dedicated to helping people with special needs reach beyond their boundaries through equine-assisted therapies, education, and research.

—
3
United Cerebral Palsy of Nevada

The organization primarily provides direct services for people with disabilities, including vocational placement and training, case management, recreational and day programs.

—
4
Nci Affiliates Inc

Providing vocational training,day program, and community living services that encourage and support individuals with disabilities so that they may successfully achieve their personal and professional goals.

Employment
5
Nevada Legal Services Inc

To ensure equal access to justice for low-income nevadans.

Crime & Legal
6
Northwest Center Services

Mission of northwest center services is to promote the growth, development, and independence of persons with disabilities through programs of therapy, education, and work opportunity.

Human Services
7
Neurodiversity Works

At Neurodiversity Works, our mission is to empower individuals with diverse neuro-variations, such as autism, ADHD, and dyslexia, to achieve meaningful careers and sustainable wages in the rapidly expanding drone and analytics industry.

Employment
8
The Stride Center

As an innovative social enterprise, The Stride Center's mission is to empower men and women facing barriers to employment to achieve economic self-sufficiency. We provide a comprehensive career development program that includes job skills…

—
9
Nicks Community

Nicks Community is dedicated to the support and service of adult individuals with disabilities.

Human Services
10
Options Family of Services

Improve disabled persons quality of life.

—
11
Working Dogs of Nevada Rescue

Our mission is to save, rehabilitate and rehome animals which may otherwise be euthanized at shelters due to their behavioural issues.

—
12
Noahs House

The organization provides opportunities for growth, independence, and fulfillment for adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities by offering a loving, nurturing, and affordable residential community, along with structured…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Cabinet Inc; the most unlike its peers is Note-Able Music Therapy Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOR PETS SAKE: $328,500 · OtherFOR PETS SAKETHE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE: $75,000 · OtherTHE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGEIndividual grant recipient: $37,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCenter Adaptive Rd: $20,000 · Other+8 more: $54,477 · Other+8 moreTHE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC: $76,580 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'…NEIGHBOR NETWORK OF NORTHERN NEVADA: $5,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBOR NETW…MY JOURNEY HOME INC: $64,000 · EducationMY JOURNEY…NOTE-ABLE MUSIC THERAPY SERVICES: $11,000 · Arts & CultureNOAH'S ANIMAL HOUSE FOUNDATION: $7,500 · AnimalsFARMING HOPE: $5,000 · EmploymentCenter for Adaptive Riding: $2,250 · HealthSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $200 · Crime & Legal
Other$515,477Human Services$81,580Education$64,000Arts & Culture$11,000Animals$7,500Employment$5,000Health$2,250Crime & Legal$200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC: $76,580 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE: $75,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNOTE-ABLE MUSIC THERAPY SERVICES: $11,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNOAH'S ANIMAL HOUSE FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNEIGHBOR NETWORK OF NORTHERN NEVADA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCenter for Adaptive Riding: $2,250 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MY JOURNEY HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds NOTE-ABLE MUSIC THERAPY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds NOAH'S ANIMAL HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FARMING HOPE ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBOR NETWORK OF NORTHERN NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds Center for Adaptive Riding ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization DR Bridge of Hope funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from DR Bridge of Hope. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to DR Bridge of Hope?

    Find your warmest path to DR Bridge of Hope through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on DR Bridge of Hope’s filings →

    More from the funding graph