Skip to content
Doz Charitable Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Doz Charitable Foundation Inc

Organization provides monetary and human resources support to those without the means to adequately provide for themselves, whether directly or in cooperation with entities sharing similar purposes.

$148k
Granted FY2023
7
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Education$108kHealth$107kHousing & Shelter$45kPhilanthropy$40kYouth Development$28kFood & Nutrition$14kInternational$12kHuman Services$6kOther$0
02FY2023 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $58,883, the rows itemized in this filing. The $147,712 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $88,829 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k5 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $25k
$7,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$85k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLAKE'S SMILES$12,743
SEEDS OF HOPE INC$12,500
KIDS AGAINST HUNGER$8,620
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF INDIANAPOLIS INC$7,500
HORIZON INTERNATIONAL$6,020
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION$6,000
INDIANA CHILDREN'S WISH FUND$5,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COBURN PLACE SAFE HAVEN II INC: $6k → 16%OUTSIDE THE BOX INC: $6k → 16%NOBLESVILLE YOUTH ASSISTANCE INC: $7k → 5%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$188k · 8 repeat orgs$175k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2023, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
9

Total granted

$188k
$157k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+93%

Still filing today

88%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
HealthHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesEducationFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OH KY & IN
    7× · 2019–2025 · $46k · revenue +27%
  • SO
    SEEDS OF HOPE INC
    2× · 2019–2023 · $23k · revenue +52%
  • FH
    FAIR HAVEN FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2020–2025 · $20k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • Indiana University Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $108k · revenue +93%
  • BT
    BREAKTHROUGH T1Dgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +35%
  • NY
    NOBLESVILLE YOUTH ASSISTANCE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue +180%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
2
Handicap International

Handicap international dba humanity & inclusion (hi) works with people with disabilities and people living in situations of vulnerability, including poverty, exclusion, conflict, and disaster.

International
3
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
4
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
5
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
6
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
7
Indiana University Health Bedford Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
8
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
9
Independent Insurance Agents of Indiana

To enhance the competitive position and fulfill business requirements of independent agents and brokers, advocating buyer interest, and continually striving to be the premier trade association.

—
10
Indiana University Health Bloomington Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
11
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
12
Indiana Health Information Exchange Inc

Through information exchange, we improve health and healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Oh Ky & in; the most unlike its peers is Breakthrough T1D. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OH KY & IN: $46,100 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OH KY & …SEEDS OF HOPE INC: $22,790 · HealthSEEDS OF HOPE INCFAIR HAVEN FOUNDATION INC: $19,500 · HealthFAIR HAVEN FOUNDATION INCBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $7,500 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1DINDIANA WISH INC: $5,500 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S THERAPLAY FOUNDATION INC: $5,400 · HealthINDIANA CANINE ASSISTANT NETWORK INC: $5,000 · HealthIndiana University Foundation: $108,090 · EducationIndiana University FoundationMD FAMILY FOUNDATION: $39,720 · OtherMD FAMILY FOUNDATIONBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $21,600 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF…ENTERPRISE HOUSING INC DBA BLAKE SMILES: $12,743 · OtherENTERPRISE HOUSING INC …COALITION FOR HOMELESSNESS INTERVENTION AND PREVENTION OF GREATER INDPLS INC: $13,000 · Housing & ShelterHAMILTON COUNTY AREA NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT INC: $6,090 · Housing & ShelterPARTNERS IN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $6,000 · Housing & ShelterNOBLESVILLE YOUTH ASSISTANCE INC: $6,500 · Human ServicesOUTSIDE THE BOX INC: $6,490 · Human ServicesCOBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN II INC: $5,900 · Human ServicesFREEDOM FOODS A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $13,620 · Food & NutritionHORIZON INTERNATIONAL INC: $11,645 · International
Health$111,790Education$108,090Other$74,063Housing & Shelter$25,090Human Services$18,890Food & Nutrition$13,620International$11,645

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIndiana University Foundation: $108,090 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OH KY & IN: $46,100 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSEEDS OF HOPE INC: $22,790 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $21,600 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFAIR HAVEN FOUNDATION INC: $19,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetFREEDOM FOODS A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $13,620 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCOALITION FOR HOMELESSNESS INTERVENTION AND PREVENTION OF GREATER INDPLS INC: $13,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetENTERPRISE HOUSING INC DBA BLAKE SMILES: $12,743 over 1y, 46% of budgetHORIZON INTERNATIONAL INC: $11,645 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNOBLESVILLE YOUTH ASSISTANCE INC: $6,500 over 1y, 11% of budgetOUTSIDE THE BOX INC: $6,490 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHAMILTON COUNTY AREA NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT INC: $6,090 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPARTNERS IN HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN II INC: $5,900 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINDIANA WISH INC: $5,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S THERAPLAY FOUNDATION INC: $5,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetINDIANA CANINE ASSISTANT NETWORK INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Central…The Indianapolis Foun…Nicholas H Noyes Jr M…Central Indiana Commu…Lilly Endowment IncHamilton County Commu…Hoover Family Foundat…Lumina Foundation for…Nina Mason Pulliam Ch…Healthcare Initiative…Indiana University He…Eugene & Marilyn Glic…
United Way of Central Indiana IncIN29.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Central Indiana Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · Hoover Family Foundation · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Healthcare Initiatives Inc · Indiana University Health Inc · Eugene & Marilyn Glick Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Doz Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Doz Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Doz Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Doz Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $167k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Doz’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home