· Private foundation
Downtown Jaycees Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOOD AND FRIENDS | $5,305 |
| DONORS CHOOSE | $3,171 |
| WANDA ALSTON FOUNDATION | $3,000 |
| ARLINGTON SOCCER ASSOCIATION | $2,524 |
| DC JAZZ FESTIVAL FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| THE AMERICAN EXPERIENCE FOUNDATION INC | $2,170 |
| THE TREVOR PROJECT | $2,068 |
| CITY BLOSSOMS | $2,066 |
| SEXUAL MINORITY YOUTH ASSISTANCE LEAGUE | $1,750 |
| MATTIE MIRACLE CANCER FOUNDATION | $1,334 |
| CORE FOUNDATION | $1,256 |
| LATINA READING TOMORROW | $1,000 |
| METRO DC COMMUNITY CENTER INC | $1,000 |
| SCAN OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA | $500 |
| DOORWAYS | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 69% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +6% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFFOOD & FRIENDS INC7× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +139%
- BBBRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC7× · 2017–2024 · $19k · revenue +249%
- WAWANDA ALSTON FOUNDATION INC6× · 2020–2025 · $13k · revenue +82%
Funded once
- CVCAMP VIRGINIA JAYCEE INCone grant, 2017 · $3k
- GUGALLAUDET UNIVERSITYone grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +21%
HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2024 · $3k · revenue +34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our mission is to dramatically improve the early career outcomes of dc youth and young adults of color by creating innovative programs and by mobilizing employers, educators, and city leaders to create a local, diverse talent pipeline. our…
Global kids educates, inspires and mobilizes youth to become global citizens who are positively engaged in the world and are prepared for their future.
The mission of dc bilingual public charter school is to create a learning community that ensures high academic achievement for all students in both spanish and english, develops leadership, and values all cultures.
Provide students with the academic foundation and ambition to earn a college degree.
Ingenuity prep public charter school was formed to prepare students to succeed in college and beyond as impactful civiic leaders.
To create and advance high quality, diverse educational communities that teach children the foundations of life-long learning and social responsibility.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
Capitol Hill Day School is a co-educational independent school serving students from pre-kindergarten through 8th grade. Capitol Hill Day School deeply engages a diverse community of students in connecting the classroom with the larger…
Two rivers mission: to nurture a diverse group of students to become lifelong, active participants in their own education, develop a sense of self and community, and become responsible and compassionate members of society.
We're making the District of Columbia a place where all kids grow up safe, resilient, powerful and heard. DC Action uses research, data, and a racial equity lens to break down barriers that stand in the way of all kids reaching their full…
Dc prep's mission is to bridge the educational divide in washington, dc by increasing the number of students from underserved communities with the academic preparation and personal character to succeed in competitive high schools and…
LILI partners with public schools and cultural institutions to create and deliver experiential learning opportunities for students in order to increase their self-efficacy, build on their intrinsic motivation, and support their scholarly…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Junior Achievement of Greater Washington and the most unlike its peers is Latinas Leading Tomorrow. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FOOD & FRIENDS INC ↗
- Who funds BRIGHT BEGINNINGS INC ↗
- Who funds WANDA ALSTON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CITY BLOSSOMS INC ↗
- Who funds SMYAL Inc ↗
- Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER WASHINGTON ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN EXPERIENCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON SOCCER ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds M STREET CENTER ↗
- Who funds Jubilee Jumpstart ↗
- Who funds ARLINGTON THRIVE ↗
- Who funds THE MATTIE MIRACLE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds A WIDER CIRCLE INC ↗
- Who funds Youth Leadership Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CAPITOL CITY ROBOTICS INC ↗
- Who funds Kid Pan Alley ↗
- Who funds The Fishing School Inc ↗
- Who funds CAPITAL AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds CORE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP VIRGINIA JAYCEE INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE ↗
- Who funds GALLAUDET UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds TEAM DC INC ↗
- Who funds SASHA BRUCE YOUTHWORK INC ↗
- Who funds METRO DC COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Latinas Leading Tomorrow ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · Dimick Foundation John M Lynham Jr Trustee · Arlington Community Foundation · Clark-Winchcole Foundation · United Way of the National Capital Area · Washington Forrest Foundation · Philip L Graham Fund co Graham Holdings Company · Richard E & Nancy P Marriott Foundation · John Edward Fowler Memorial Foundation · Venable Foundation Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Downtown Jaycees Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- A Wider Circle Inc — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.