Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dow Company Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$20M
Granted FY2024still arriving
221
Grants FY2024still arriving
23
States reached
$2.4M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$29MEducation$29MPhilanthropy$11MInternational$9.2MArts & Culture$8.1MEmployment$3.6MCommunity Improvement$1.9MHuman Services$1.5MOther$0
02FY2024 · 221 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k105 grants · $435k
  • $10k–50k81 grants · $1.5M
  • $50k–250k23 grants · $3.0M
  • $250k+12 grants · $15M
$10,000
Median grant
23
States reached
$250M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION$2,356,233
MIDLAND CENTER FOR THE ARTS$2,250,000
Individual grant recipient$2,175,000
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNO$2,000,000
REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY$1,633,334
MYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION$1,340,000
Individual grant recipient$958,000
UNITED WAY OF MIDLAND COUNTY$600,000
FOR INSPIRATION AND RECOGNITIO$500,000
TEACH FOR ALL INC$400,000
TEMPLEARTS$300,000
CATALYST INC$250,000
SAGINAW COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$215,000
LOUISIANA FOUNDATION FOR$204,200
CONGRESSIONAL BLACK CAUCUS$200,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $4.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 23% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $10k → 8%THE TIDES CENTER: $1.5M → 10%PACK SHACK NORTHWEST ARKANSAS: $10k → 8%ACCESS: $35k → 21%CGLR FOUNDATION: $50k → 17%WOMENS CRISIS CENTER INC: $5k → 11%CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $10k → 8%THE TIDES CENTER: $1.5M → 10%PACK SHACK NORTHWEST ARKANSAS: $6k → 8%ACCESS: $21k → 21%CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $10k → 8%YWCA TRI-COUNTY AREA: $10k → 7%PACK SHACK NORTHWEST ARKANSAS: $18k → 8%SELF LOVE BEAUTY: $10k → 9%SPRING HAVEN INC: $22k → 13%PACK SHACK NORTHWEST ARKANSAS: $17k → 8%MUST MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 8%HELPING HAND OF HOPE INC: $22k → 13%YWCA TRI-COUNTY AREA: $8k → 7%LIFE LEADERS INC: $9k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE TEXAS: $10k → 16%MUST MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 8%MUST MINISTRIES INC: $5k → 8%GREAT LAKES BAY FOUNDATION: $200k → 18%MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $22k → 14%MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%GREAT LAKES BAY FOUNDATION: $155k → 18%CHRISTMAS GALA: $15k → 6%HOODIES 4 HEALING: $5k → 16%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $10k → 14%GREAT LAKES BAY FOUNDATION: $150k → 18%MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%GREAT LAKES BAY FOUNDATION: $150k → 18%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $10k → 14%MITZVAH CIRCLE FOUNDATION: $10k → 7%CHRISTMAS GALA: $10k → 6%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $10k → 14%CHRISTMAS GALA: $10k → 6%YWCA GREAT LAKES BAY REGION: $24k → 14%ORANGE COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION: $17k → 14%HIDDEN HARVEST: $25k → 18%ACCION COMUNAL LATINOAMERICAN: $10k → 7%ACCION COMUNAL LATINOAMERICAN: $10k → 7%CLEVELAND MANOR INC: $50k → 9%DISTRICT 2S4 LIONS CHARITIES: $20k → 10%ONE HOUSE AT A TIME: $10k → 7%ONE HOUSE AT A TIME: $8k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
ID
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AR
TN
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

71%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$61M · 211 repeat orgs$25M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +13% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

211 repeat relationships: 161 still active in FY2024, 50 since wound down; 55 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

211
142

Total granted

$61M
$23M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
+8%

Still filing today

47%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationEnvironmentPhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    Midland Center for the Arts Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $7.0M · revenue +57%
  • TF
    TEACH FOR ALL INC
    2× · 2021–2024 · $700k · revenue +55%
  • GL
    GREAT LAKES BAY FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $655k · revenue +21% · 39% of their budget

Funded once

  • SV
    See Vendor Report Attached to Return
    one grant, 2020 · $18M
  • OC
    ONETEN COALITION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1.5M · revenue -53%
  • TS
    THE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2022 · $175k · revenue -25%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
2
United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey

United way's mission is to end intergenerational poverty in our region by harnessing, leveraging and strategically investing the collective power of donors, advocates and volunteers, to help individuals and families break the cycle of…

Philanthropy
3
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
4
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
5
United Way of Central Ohio Inc

United way of central ohio is the local organization that harnesses the power of communities working together - people, nonprofits, businesses and government - to create a stronger, more equitable central ohio. see schedule o.we do this…

Philanthropy
6
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
7
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
8
Michigan Enviromental Council

Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.

Environment
9
Association of Washington Cities

The association of washington cities builds connections between our state's diverse cities and towns, while providing our members with the support needed to thrive through delivery of data-driven education, nationally recognized pooling…

—
10
Greater Washington Partnership

We identify shared opportunities and core challenges and offer solutions to the region's most critical issues including skills and talent, regional mobility, infrastructure and inclusive economic growth.

Recreation & Sports
11
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
12
Behavior Analyst Certification Board Inc

We protect consumers of behavior analysis services by systematically establishing, promoting, and disseminating professional standards.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orion Communities Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gmz Education and Development Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

208 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 208 of the 416 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

9
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
25
Early backer (in before they grew)
205/208
Grantees still filing
117/208
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

See Vendor Report Attached to Return: $18,277,824 · OtherSee Vendor Report Attached to ReturnIndividual grant recipient: $10,850,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNO: $6,000,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOREGENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF: $4,066,666 · OtherREGENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OFIndividual grant recipient: $2,920,000 · OtherUnited Way of Midland County: $2,665,000 · Other+130 more: $17,648,445 · Other+130 moreCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $8,346,163 · PhilanthropyCHARITIES AID …United Way of Brazoria County: $880,000 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of …United Way of St Charles: $780,500 · PhilanthropyUnited Way of …CAPITAL AREA UNITED WAY: $630,000 · PhilanthropySaginaw Community Foundation: $610,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF SAGINAW COUNTY: $455,000 · Philanthropy+9 more: $764,800 · Philanthropy+9 moreMidland Center for the Arts Inc: $7,000,000 · Arts & CultureMidland C…TEMPLEARTS: $775,000 · Arts & CultureTEMPLEART…+5 more: $275,000 · Arts & CultureMYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $4,000,000 · HealthMICHIGAN HEALTH IMPROVEMENT ALLIANCE: $685,000 · Health+4 more: $184,300 · HealthTIDES CENTER: $3,000,000 · Human ServicesGREAT LAKES BAY FOUNDATION: $655,000 · Human Services+16 more: $533,856 · Human ServicesTEACH FOR ALL INC: $700,000 · EducationPRAIRIE VIEW A&M FOUNDATION: $440,000 · EducationTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $440,000 · EducationSOUTHERN UNIVERTY SYSTEM: $241,200 · EducationThe North Carolina A&T Real Estate Foundation Inc: $220,000 · EducationDONORSCHOOSEORG: $125,000 · Education+11 more: $426,197 · EducationONETEN COALITION INC: $1,500,000 · Civil Rights
Other$62,427,935Philanthropy$12,466,463Arts & Culture$8,050,000Health$4,869,300Human Services$4,188,856Education$2,592,397Civil Rights$1,500,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $8,346,163 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMidland Center for the Arts Inc: $7,000,000 over 4y, 21% of budgetMYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION: $4,000,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetTIDES CENTER: $3,000,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUnited Way of Midland County: $2,665,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetTHE MANUFACTURING INSTITUTE: $1,500,000 over 2y, 11% of budgetONETEN COALITION INC: $1,500,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetIron Belle Trail Fund: $1,000,000 over 3y, 39% of budgetUnited Way of Brazoria County: $880,000 over 4y, 9.5% of budgetUnited Way of St Charles: $780,500 over 4y, 9.9% of budgetTEMPLEARTS: $775,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetTEACH FOR ALL INC: $700,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMICHIGAN HEALTH IMPROVEMENT ALLIANCE: $685,000 over 4y, 36% of budgetGREAT LAKES BAY FOUNDATION: $655,000 over 4y, 39% of budgetCAPITAL AREA UNITED WAY: $630,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetSaginaw Community Foundation: $610,000 over 4y, 8.4% of budgetCATALYST INC: $600,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetMIDLAND BUSINESS ALLIANCE: $560,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC: $518,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY OF SAGINAW COUNTY: $455,000 over 4y, 5.5% of budgetPRAIRIE VIEW A&M FOUNDATION: $440,000 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $440,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF BAY COUNTY: $395,000 over 4y, 8.7% of budgetBRAZOSPORT CARES: $310,000 over 4y, 7.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $245,000 over 4y, 7.7% of budgetSOUTHERN UNIVERTY SYSTEM: $241,200 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetThe North Carolina A&T Real Estate Foundation Inc: $220,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE ST BERNARD PROJECT INC: $175,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF BUCKS COUNTY: $130,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetBAY AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG: $125,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAGENDA FOR CHILDREN: $125,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSAGINAW BASIN LAND CONSERVANCY: $100,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetRESTORE THE EARTH FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetMICHIGAN BASEBALL FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUS INDIA FRIENDSHIP ALLIANCE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $85,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBATON ROUGE GREEN ASSOCIATION INC: $79,600 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetLABI Foundation: $75,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CALHOUN COUNTY: $75,000 over 4y, 5.3% of budgetTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $70,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBRAZOSPORT COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $66,000 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetCHIPPEWA NATURE CENTER: $65,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetOHIO VALLEY UNITED CHARITIES INC: $62,800 over 3y, 13% of budgetPERKIOMEN WATERSHED CONSERVANCY: $61,000 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetDelaware Valley Science Fairs Inc: $60,000 over 3y, 7.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Midland Center for the Arts Inc ↗
  • Who funds MYMICHIGAN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TIDES CENTER ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Midland County ↗
  • Who funds THE MANUFACTURING INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds ONETEN COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds Iron Belle Trail Fund ↗
  • Who funds United Way of Brazoria County ↗
  • Who funds United Way of St Charles ↗
  • Who funds TEMPLEARTS ↗
  • Who funds TEACH FOR ALL INC ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN HEALTH IMPROVEMENT ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds GREAT LAKES BAY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAPITAL AREA UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds Saginaw Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CATALYST INC ↗
  • Who funds MIDLAND BUSINESS ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds TEAM RUBICON INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF SAGINAW COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE VIEW A&M FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF BAY COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds BRAZOSPORT CARES ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF ORANGE COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Midland Area Community FoundationMI38.6× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Midland Area Community Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Saginaw Community Foundation · The Herbert H & Grace a Dow Foundation · Bierlein Companies Foundation · Bay Area Community Foundation · Allen E & Marie A Nickless Memorial Foundation · Wickson-Link Memorial Foundation · The Charles J Strosacker Foundation · Morley Foundation · Rollin M Gerstacker Foundation · Frank N Andersen Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dow Company Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dow Company Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
51report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Dow Company Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Dow Company Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 416 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dow Company’s filings →

More from the funding graph