Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Dover's Chair Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$57k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$979k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Camp Tails$10,000
Wings Programs Inc$6,850
Greenpoint Cats Inc$5,000
Heidi's Kitten Rescue$5,000
Equine Outreach$5,000
The Street Dog Coalition$5,000
Whiskers- A-GoGo$5,000
Old Dogs New Digs$5,000
Bitter Root Humane Association$4,846
Individual grant recipient$4,815
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 19% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Heidi's Kitten Rescue: $5k → 11%Greenpoint Cats Inc: $5k → 17%Whiskers- A-GoGo: $5k → 20%Equine Outreach: $5k → 10%The Street Dog Coalition: $5k → 11%Old Dogs New Digs: $5k → 12%Camp Tails: $10k → 12%Bitter Root Humane Association: $5k → 11%Wings Programs Inc: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
2
Runaways Animal Rescue
Animals
3
Pets Without Partners

Find homes for homeless/abandoned dogs. Provide full vet car and housing while awaiting adoption,

Animals
4
Forgotten Tails Animal Rescue Inc

Saving dogs

Animals
5
Happy Tails Dog Rescue Inc

The Organization's mission is to rescue dogs from high-kill animal shelters and place them in loving forever homes. All dogs rescued are given necessary medical care prior to adoption, including required vaccinations. Dogs are placed in…

Animals
6
Tabby Tails Cat Rescue

To rescue cats in need provide them with necessary medical care and adopt them into forever homes.

Animals
7
Cat Tail Farms Feline Sanctuary

Animal rescue and housing

Animals
8
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
9
Unos Home for Wayward Cats and Dogs

Animal rescue organization

Animals
10
Paws and Claws Animal Welfare Society Inc

Animal Rescue

Animals
11
Peggys Paws

Very small operation, we do T/N/R in the local area

Animals
12
St Clouds Rescue
Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Camp Tails and the most unlike its peers is Heidi's Kitten Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CAMP TAILS — $10,000 · AnimalsCAMP TAILSWHISKERS-AGOGO INC — $5,000 · AnimalsWHISKERS-AGOGO INCEQUINE OUTREACH INC — $5,000 · AnimalsEQUINE OUTREACH INCOLD DOGS NEW DIGS — $5,000 · AnimalsOLD DOGS NEW DIGSGREENPOINT CATS INC — $5,000 · AnimalsGREENPOINT CATS INCThe Street Dog Coalition — $5,000 · AnimalsThe Street Dog CoalitionHEIDI'S KITTEN RESCUE — $5,000 · AnimalsHEIDI'S KITTEN RESCUEBITTER ROOT HUMANE ASSOCIATION — $4,846 · AnimalsBITTER ROOT HUMANE ASSOCIATIONWINGS PROGRAMS INC — $6,850 · HealthWINGS PROGRAM…Individual grant recipient — $4,815 · OtherIndividua…
Animals$44,846Health$6,850Other$4,815

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCAMP TAILS — $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetWINGS PROGRAMS INC — $6,850 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetWHISKERS-AGOGO INC — $5,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetEQUINE OUTREACH INC — $5,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetOLD DOGS NEW DIGS — $5,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetGREENPOINT CATS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetThe Street Dog Coalition — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBITTER ROOT HUMANE ASSOCIATION — $4,846 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Dover's Chair Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph