Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Douglas S Witcher Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
28
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$4.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $204k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+6 grants · $8.5M
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$246k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALDWELL ACADEMY$4,000,000
HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY$3,000,000
HIGH POINT POLICE FOUNDATION$500,000
TAG$500,000
COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF HP$272,000
PENNYBYRN CAPITAL CAMPAIGN$250,000
ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$220,000
Individual grant recipient$200,000
BPS FOUNDATION$200,000
QUBEIN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$166,000
HIGH POINT REGIONAL FOUNDATION$125,000
HP DOWNTOWN STADIUM FOUNDATION$80,000
Individual grant recipient$66,875
EISENHOWER HEALTH FOUNDATION$50,000
ST MARY'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$50,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $29k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT: $9k → 16%COMMUNITY COLLABORATION FOR CHILDRE: $20k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 5% of Douglas S Witcher Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in NC; read by stated purpose it is 92% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Douglas S Witcher Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
High Point Regional Health Foundation

To promote health and wellness to the general public through the support of services and mission of high point regional health (dba atrium health wake forest baptist high point medical center).

Health
2
Forward High Point Inc

To transform the high point, north carolina core-city area into an extraodinary and vibrant destination to live, work, study and play.

Community Improvement
3
High Point Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc Dba Visit High Point

The mission of Visit High Point is to position High Point as a destination that visitors will enjoy and that locals will want to promote.

4
High Point Community Foundation

The high point community foundation is a catalyst for positive change that promotes philanthropy, administers an expanding grants program and serves as a trustworthy partner in responding to community needs. our vision is to establish and…

Philanthropy
5
High Point Academy

High point academy awakens the joy of learning in each child. the school provides a nurturing environment that enables each student to flourish academically, emotionally, morally, physically, and socially. the challenging curriculum…

Education
6
High Point Chamber Foundation

(1) to promote the advancement and dissemination of knowledge and understanding in economics, finance, education & training, science, and technology throughout the community of high point, north carolina and its region with regard to…

Philanthropy
7
Cpc Integrated Health Inc

To provide behavioral health and education services that promote wellness, recovery and productive lives.

8
Business High Point Inc D/B/a High Point Chamber of Commerce

Business high point, inc. is dedicated to encouraging economic growth in the piedmont triad region of north carolina. the chamber is an advocate for our members and our community on business-related issues and participates in initiatives…

9
Highpoint Center for Printmaking

Highpoint Center for Printmaking is dedicated to advancing the art of printmaking. We create pathways for artists, learners, and the public to increase their understanding and appreciation of printmaking through artistic and educational…

Arts & Culture
10
High Point Historical Society Inc

The high point historical society collects, preserves and showcase the history of greater high point to foster a shared appreciation of our community reflected in the stories, events and traditions of our past

Arts & Culture
11
High Point Baseball Inc

To promote the social welfare of the community of high point, north carolina and to lessen the burdens of the city government, through the operation and management, of a minor league baseball team, for the public benefit.

12
Habitat for Humanity of High Point Archdale & Trinity Inc

Habitat for Humanity of High Point, Archdale and Trinity is an ecumenical Christian movement whose goal is to build safe, decent, affordable homes for our neighbors in need. Through conscience and action, Habitat utilizes volunteer labor…

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Greater High Point Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bps Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CALDWELL ACADEMY — $4,010,005 · EducationCALDWELL ACADEMYHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY — $3,020,000 · EducationHIGH POINT UNIVERSITYTAG — $500,000 · OtherTAGST MARYS EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $282,600 · OtherST MARYS EPISCOPAL CHURCHCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF HP — $272,000 · OtherCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF…PENNYBYRN CAPITAL CAMPAIGN — $250,000 · OtherPENNYBYRN CAPITAL CAMPAIG…BPS FOUNDATION — $200,000 · OtherBPS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $200,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipien…HIGH POINT REGIONAL FOUNDATION — $175,000 · OtherHIGH POINT REGIONAL FOUND…QUBEIN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM — $166,000 · OtherQUBEIN CHILDREN'S MUSEUMHP DOWNTOWN STADIUM FOUNDATION — $105,000 · Other+5 more — $122,208 · Other+5 moreHIGH POINT POLICE FOUNDATION — $500,000 · Crime & LegalEisenhower Medical Center — $50,000 · HealthUNITED WAY OF GREATER HIGH POINT INC — $45,833 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY COLLABORATION FOR CHILDREN INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC — $9,400 · Human ServicesJUNIOR LEAGUE OF HIGH POINT NC INC — $25,000 · Community Improvement
Education$7,030,005Other$2,272,808Crime & Legal$500,000Health$50,000Philanthropy$45,833Human Services$29,400Community Improvement$25,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCALDWELL ACADEMY — $4,010,005 over 1y, 28% of budgetHIGH POINT UNIVERSITY — $3,020,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHIGH POINT POLICE FOUNDATION — $500,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetBPS FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEisenhower Medical Center — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER HIGH POINT INC — $45,833 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF HIGH POINT NC INC — $25,000 over 1y, 57% of budgetCOMMUNITY COLLABORATION FOR CHILDREN INC — $20,000 over 1y, 8.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC — $9,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CALDWELL ACADEMY
  • Who funds HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds HIGH POINT POLICE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BPS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER HIGH POINT INC
  • Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF HIGH POINT NC INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY COLLABORATION FOR CHILDREN INC
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE OF THE PIEDMONT INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Apat & Kathryne Lbrown FoundationNC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Apat & Kathryne Lbrown Foundation · Earl and Kathryn Congdon Family Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Douglas S Witcher Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph