Skip to content

· Private foundation

Douglas E Mitchell Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$63k
Granted FY2025still arriving
29
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$152kEducation$51kRecreation & Sports$45kEnvironment$44kHealth$37kHuman Services$36kReligion$28kAnimals$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 29 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $43k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$1,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$964k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CLEVELAND$20,000
JUNIOR LEAGUE OF MINNEAPOLIS - LEAGUEAIRES DEVELOPMENT$5,000
GROVES ACADEMY$5,000
INTERFAITH OUTREACH & COMMUNITY PARTNERS$5,000
HEALING HEARTS CONNECTION$2,000
HARVEST HILLS ANIMAL SHELTER$2,000
BELIEVET CANINE SERVICE PARTNERS$2,000
NATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL (NOLS)$2,000
THE PINK FUND$2,000
MAINE NEEDS$1,750
EQUALITYMAINE FOUNDATION$1,750
4 PAWS FOR ABILITY$1,250
MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION$1,250
CHILD MIND INSTITUTE$1,000
MARYLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BELIEVET CANINE SERVICE PARTNERS: $2k → 11%THE FAMILY TREE: $500 → 7%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $1k → 9%MAINE NEEDS: $2k → 7%BELIEVET CANINE SERVICE PARTNERS: $2k → 11%THE FAMILY TREE: $500 → 7%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $1k → 9%BELIEVET CANINE SERVICE PARTNERS: $2k → 11%4 PAWS FOR ABILITY: $700 → 9%BELIEVET CANINE SERVICE PARTNERS: $1k → 11%BELIEVET CANINE SERVICE PARTNERS: $1k → 11%BELIEVET CANINE SERVICE PARTNERS: $500 → 11%BELIEVET CANINE SERVICE PARTNERS: $500 → 11%HELPING PAWS OF MINNESOTA: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
VA
MD
NC
DC
AL
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$395k · 33 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
34

Total granted

$395k
$49k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+8%

Still filing today

73%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthCivil RightsHuman ServicesRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GA
    GROVES ACADEMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $37k · revenue +58%
  • IO
    INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS
    5× · 2021–2025 · $19k · revenue +23%
  • DC
    DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $14k · revenue +56%

Funded once

  • BG
    BOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF CLEVELAND
    one grant, 2017 · $15k
  • NO
    NATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +8%
  • CK
    CYCLE KIDS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue -22%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Loving All Animals Inc

To maximize programs intended to stop killing of adoptable animals.

Philanthropy
2
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
3
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
4
Connecticut Humane Society

The connecticut humane society is the leading resource in the state for companion animal welfare, enriching the lives of families and communities through adoption services, medical care, education, and prevention of cruelty.

Animals
5
Animal Rescue Fund of the Hamptons Inc

THE ANIMAL RESCUE FUND OF THE HAMPTONS ACTIVELY RESCUES CATS AND DOGS, PROVIDES QUALITY CARE AND OFFERS SANCTUARY UNTIL LOVING HOMES CAN BE FOUND. ARF's work with animals, within our community and throughout the organization is guided by…

Animals
6
Animal Equality

Animal equality is an international organization working with society, governments, and companies to end cruelty to farmed animals.

Animals
7
Mercy for Animals Inc

Mercy for animals' mission is to construct a compassionate food system that is not just kind to animals but essential for the future of our planet and all who share it. our vision of a world where animals are respected, protected, and free…

Animals
8
Dogs Playing for Life Inc

Dogs playing for life is redefining the meaning and importance of quality of life for all sheltered dogs by improving their experience through playgroups and individualized training, resulting in urgent and responsible livesaving.

Animals
9
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
10
Indigo Rescue Inc

The organization provides specialized, life saving intervention for animals with unique characteristics and needs that render them unadoptable by shelter standards.

Animals
11
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
12
Partners for Animal Welfare Society

Animal shelter for the protection and care of abused and neglected animals.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Maryland Therapeutic Riding Inc; the most unlike its peers is Kopelion Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
54/57
Grantees still filing
43/57
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CLEVELAND: $137,187 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CLEVELANDJUNIOR LEAGUE OF MINNEAPOLIS - LEAGUEAIRES DEVELOPMENT: $36,000 · OtherJUNIOR LEAGUE OF MINNEAPOLIS - LEAGUEAIRES DEVELOPMENTNATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL (NOLS): $34,750 · OtherNATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL (NOLS)Wayzata Community Church: $27,000 · OtherWayzata Community ChurchINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $19,000 · OtherINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERSBOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF CLEVELAND: $14,500 · Other+34 more: $44,450 · Other+34 moreGROVES ACADEMY: $37,000 · EducationGROVES ACADE…DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $14,000 · EducationDUNWOODY COL…+1 more: $1,000 · EducationPINK FUND INC: $12,500 · HealthMETAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC: $7,300 · HealthMARYLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $4,300 · HealthREPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ACCESS PROJECT INC: $3,900 · HealthHERE FOR THE GIRLS INC: $1,900 · Health+2 more: $1,500 · HealthHARVEST HILLS ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $6,450 · AnimalsTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $5,700 · AnimalsMORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $2,250 · AnimalsKOPELION INC: $1,850 · AnimalsMISSION WOLF: $1,000 · AnimalsBrother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc: $1,000 · AnimalsFOR THE LOVE OF ALEX INC: $1,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $750 · Animals+5 more: $2,200 · AnimalsBELIEVET CANINE SERVICE PARTNERS INC: $9,000 · Human Services4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $2,950 · Human ServicesMaine Needs Inc: $1,750 · Human ServicesEqualityMaine Foundation: $1,750 · Human ServicesFAMILY TREE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesHELPING PAWS INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $4,850 · Civil RightsEqualityMaine: $1,750 · Civil RightsElevated Access Inc: $1,100 · Civil RightsREPRESENTWOMEN INC: $1,100 · Civil RightsYellowhammer Fund: $1,000 · Civil RightsTHE LOVELAND FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL: $7,000 · EnvironmentINLAND WOODS TRAILS: $750 · Environment
Other$312,887Education$52,000Health$31,400Animals$22,200Human Services$17,450Civil Rights$10,800Environment$7,750

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CLEVELAND: $137,187 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetGROVES ACADEMY: $37,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetINTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS: $19,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY: $14,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPINK FUND INC: $12,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBELIEVET CANINE SERVICE PARTNERS INC: $9,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetMETAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC: $7,300 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARVEST HILLS ANIMAL SHELTER INC: $6,450 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $5,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $4,850 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMARYLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC: $4,300 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHEALING HEARTS CONNECTION: $4,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ACCESS PROJECT INC: $3,900 over 4y, 0.1% of budget4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC: $2,950 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCircle of Health International: $2,750 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $2,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHERE FOR THE GIRLS INC: $1,900 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetKOPELION INC: $1,850 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetEqualityMaine Foundation: $1,750 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCYCLE KIDS INC: $1,750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEqualityMaine: $1,750 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetURBAN JUSTICE CENTER: $1,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAINE ADAPTIVE SPORTS & RECREATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPOSTPARTUM SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL: $1,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetElevated Access Inc: $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYellowhammer Fund: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBrother Wolf Animal Rescue Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY TREE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMPASSION ANIMAL PROJECT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PARENTS' PLACE OF MARYLAND INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELPING PAWS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAINFOREST TRUST: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINLAND WOODS TRAILS: $750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPETS ON WHEELS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOLE IN THE WALL GANG FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE PREGNANCY & INFANT LOSS SUPPORT: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Friends of Jamaica Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR PET LOSS AND BEREAVEMENT INC: $500 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBIRTH ROOTS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetANIMAL REFUGE LEAGUE OF GREATER PORTLAND: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KITA CENTERINC: $500 over 2y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds GROVES ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds INTERFAITH OUTREACH AND COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
  • Who funds PINK FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds BELIEVET CANINE SERVICE PARTNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds METAVIVOR RESEARCH AND SUPPORT INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HARVEST HILLS ANIMAL SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds MARYLAND THERAPEUTIC RIDING INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALING HEARTS CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ACCESS PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds 4 PAWS FOR ABILITY INC ↗
  • Who funds Circle of Health International ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MORRIS ANIMAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HERE FOR THE GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds KOPELION INC ↗
  • Who funds Maine Needs Inc ↗
  • Who funds EqualityMaine Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CYCLE KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds EqualityMaine ↗
  • Who funds URBAN JUSTICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WORLD BICYCLE RELIEF NFP ↗
  • Who funds MAINE ADAPTIVE SPORTS & RECREATION ↗
  • Who funds CHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds POSTPARTUM SUPPORT INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds Elevated Access Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Community Foundation IncME20.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Elmina B Sewall Foundation · Saco & Biddeford Savings Charitable Foundation · Xeric Foundation · Onion Foundation · S&P Global Foundation Fka the McGraw-Hill Research Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Mightycause Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Douglas E Mitchell Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Douglas E Mitchell Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Postpartum Support International: 43% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • The Parents' Place of Maryland Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Douglas E Mitchell Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Douglas E Mitchell Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Douglas E Mitchell’s filings →

More from the funding graph