Skip to content

· Private foundation

Douglas C Beaton Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$158k
Granted FY2025still arriving
34
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$313kHealth$236kEducation$180kYouth Development$98kHuman Services$73kFood & Nutrition$67kPublic Safety & Disaster$61kCrime & Legal$44kOther$0
02FY2025 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k33 grants · $138k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$4,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$3.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANITATION HEALTH RIGHTS INDIA$20,000
BRIDGE HOUSEGRACE HOUSE$9,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$9,000
WOMANS NEW LIFE CENTER$8,000
SECOND HARVEST$8,000
HOLY NAME SCHOOL$7,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$7,000
ODYSSEY HOUSE OF LOUISIANA$7,000
OPERATION SMILE$5,000
ENERGIZE THE CHAIN$5,000
PARTNERS IN HEALTH$5,000
YOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM$5,000
ENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT ROCKY MOUNTAIN$4,000
CANCER CRUSADERS$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WOMANS NEW LIFE CENTER: $8k → 23%WOMANS NEW LIFE CENTER: $8k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
IA
PA
CA
CO
VA
MD
TN
NC
SC
LA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Douglas C Beaton Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 64% of the giving stays in LA; by stated purpose, 53%.

Douglas C Beaton Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 12% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 53 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

53 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
12

Total granted

$1.1M
$34k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+155%

Still filing today

40%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationYouth DevelopmentInternationalFood & NutritionHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SANITATION AND HEALTH RIGHTS IN INDIA
    8× · 2017–2025 · $136k · revenue +602%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    7× · 2019–2025 · $35k · revenue +39%
  • RN
    RECONCILE NEW ORLEANS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $27k · revenue +416%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $8k
  • CA
    CYPRESS ACADEMY
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • TA
    THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +72%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
3
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
6
Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences

We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.

Education
7
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
8
The Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University

Stanford university is one of a select group of american universities that have achieved eminence in both undergraduate and graduate education and research - cont'd sch o.

Education
9
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

—
10
World Learning Inc

Creating a more sustainable, peaceful, and just world through education, development, and exchange since 1932. as both an accredited academic institution and an international ngo, world learning, inc. offers the best of theory and practice…

International
11
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
12
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Junior Achievement-Rocky Mountain Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sanitation and Health Rights in India. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/29
Grantees still filing
21/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRIDGE HOUSEGRACE HOUSE: $52,000 · OtherBRIDGE HOUSEGRACE HOUSEWOMENS NEW LIFE CENTER: $48,000 · OtherWOMENS NEW LIFE CENTERHOLY NAME SCHOOL: $45,000 · OtherHOLY NAME SCHOOLENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERS: $44,000 · OtherENGINEERS WITHOUT BORDERSCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICE: $42,000 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICEDOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS: $40,000 · OtherDOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERSENERGIZE THE CHAIN: $30,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $29,000 · OtherODYSSEY HOUSE OF LA: $28,000 · OtherYOUTH EMPOWERMENT PROGRAM: $28,000 · OtherSECOND HARVEST: $25,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT ROCKY MTN: $24,500 · Other+29 more: $265,500 · Other+29 moreSANITATION AND HEALTH RIGHTS IN INDIA: $136,000 · InternationalSANITATION AND H…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $15,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FR…JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC: $8,000 · International+1 more: $5,000 · InternationalENERGIZE THE CHAIN: $20,000 · HealthENERGIZE …CANCER CRUSADERS INC: $19,000 · HealthCANCER CR…PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $16,000 · HealthPARTNERS …ODYSSEY HOUSE LOUISIANA INC: $14,000 · HealthODYSSEY H…LADIES LEUKEMIA LEAGUE INC: $12,000 · HealthLADIES LE…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $12,000 · HealthST JUDE C…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 · HealthALZHEIMER…American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $35,000 · Human ServicesMORNING STAR RISING: $16,000 · Human ServicesRECONCILE NEW ORLEANS INC: $27,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUTH RUN NOLA INC: $9,000 · Youth DevelopmentBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC: $8,500 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER: $4,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $1,000 · Youth DevelopmentISIDORE NEWMAN SCHOOL: $25,000 · EducationPOMONA COLLEGE: $9,000 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $3,000 · EducationTHE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE: $2,500 · EducationStrive Preparatory Schools: $2,500 · EducationCOLORADO ACADEMY: $2,000 · EducationSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA: $20,000 · Food & NutritionSLOW FOOD CO-DENVER: $6,000 · Food & NutritionLOUISIANA CENTER FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $12,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$701,000International$164,000Health$99,000Human Services$51,000Youth Development$49,500Education$44,000Food & Nutrition$26,000Crime & Legal$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSANITATION AND HEALTH RIGHTS IN INDIA: $136,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $35,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetRECONCILE NEW ORLEANS INC: $27,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetISIDORE NEWMAN SCHOOL: $25,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER CRUSADERS INC: $19,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetMORNING STAR RISING: $16,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFund 17: $15,000 over 5y, 3.9% of budgetODYSSEY HOUSE LOUISIANA INC: $14,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLADIES LEUKEMIA LEAGUE INC: $12,000 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOUISIANA CENTER FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS: $12,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH RUN NOLA INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetPOMONA COLLEGE: $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF COLORADO INC: $8,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT-ROCKY MOUNTAIN INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASHEVILLE CITY SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSLOW FOOD CO-DENVER: $6,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF METRO DENVER: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAKTHROUGH COLLABORATIVE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetStrive Preparatory Schools: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLORADO ACADEMY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSON OF A SAINT: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SANITATION AND HEALTH RIGHTS IN INDIA ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds RECONCILE NEW ORLEANS INC ↗
  • Who funds ISIDORE NEWMAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA ↗
  • Who funds ENERGIZE THE CHAIN ↗
  • Who funds CANCER CRUSADERS INC ↗
  • Who funds MORNING STAR RISING ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Fund 17 ↗
  • Who funds ODYSSEY HOUSE LOUISIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds LADIES LEUKEMIA LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA CENTER FOR CHILDREN'S RIGHTS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater New Orleans FoundationLA25.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Baptist Community Ministries · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Mary Freeman Wisdom Foundation · J Edgar Monroe Foundation · Goldring Family Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Douglas C Beaton Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Douglas C Beaton Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Douglas C Beaton Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph