Skip to content

· Private foundation

Dorothy Loudon Foundation

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$121k
Granted FY2018
18
Grants FY2018
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2018.

Arts & Culture$123kPhilanthropy$9kAnimals$6kHuman Services$5kCommunity Improvement$3kFood & Nutrition$250Other$0
02FY2018 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k16 grants · $68k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $53k
$4,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THEATRE WORLD AWARDS$40,000
Individual grant recipient$12,997
Individual grant recipient$7,500
THE NEW GROUP THEATER$5,000
ANIMAL RESCUE FUND$5,000
SIGNATURE THEATER$5,000
NYCity Center$5,000
CLASSIC STAGE COMPANY$4,500
THE VINEYEARD THEATER$4,500
ATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY$4,500
PLAYWRIGHTS HORIZON$4,500
PRIMARY STAGES$4,500
MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB$4,500
MINT THEATER COMPANY$4,500
ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY$4,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–18) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%North Shore Animal League: $100 → 6%EAST HAMPTON LIBRARY: $1k → 7%ATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY: $5k → 17%Mint Theater Company: $3k → 20%EAST HAMPTON LIBRARY: $100 → 7%ATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY: $2k → 17%PAGE 73 PRODUCTIONS: $1k → 20%ANIMAL RESCUE FUND: $5k → 7%AMERICAN THEATER COMPANY: $2k → 17%ANIMAL RESCUE FUND: $1k → 7%HB PLAYWRIGHT FDTN: $500 → 17%RED BULL THEATER: $1k → 17%HB PLAYWRIGHT FDTN: $250 → 17%URBAN STAGES: $13k → 17%URBAN STAGES: $7k → 17%PRIMARY STAGES: $5k → 17%ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY: $5k → 17%ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY: $3k → 17%PRIMARY STAGES: $2k → 17%TRANSPORT GROUP THEATRE CO: $2k → 17%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $100 → 17%THE VINEYEARD THEATER: $5k → 17%CLASSIC STAGE COMPANY: $5k → 17%NEW YORK THEATRE WORKSHOP: $3k → 17%THE VINEYEARD THEATER: $2k → 17%NEW YORK THEATRE WORKSHOP: $1k → 17%NYCity Center: $5k → 17%NY City Center: $3k → 17%GODS LOVE WE DELIVER: $250 → 17%SECOND STAGE: $8k → 17%SIGNATURE THEATER: $5k → 17%THE NEW GROUP THEATER: $5k → 17%MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB: $5k → 17%PLAYWRIGHTS HORIZON: $5k → 17%MINT THEATER COMPANY: $5k → 17%SECOND STAGE: $3k → 17%PLAYWRIGHTS HORIZON: $2k → 17%MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB: $2k → 17%SIGNATURE THEATER: $1k → 17%THE NEW GROUP THEATER: $1k → 17%THE PLAYWRIGHTS REALM: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 78% of Dorothy Loudon Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 27%.

Dorothy Loudon Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$157k · 17 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
8

Total granted

$157k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+18%

Still filing today

47%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
Arts & CultureFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AT
    ATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $7k · revenue +51%
  • MT
    MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +35%
  • PH
    PLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $6k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • AT
    AMERICAN THEATER COMPANY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k
  • TG
    TRANSPORT GROUP THEATRE CO
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k
  • P7
    PAGE 73 PRODUCTIONS
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Transport Group Inc Dba Transport Group Theatre Company

Producing and developing plays and musicals.

Arts & Culture
2
Susan Smith Blackburn Prize Inc
—
3
Women's Project & Productions Inc

Wp theater is the nation's oldest and largest theater company dedicated to developing, producing, and promoting the work of women+ at every stage of their careers. for over four decades we have served as leaders of a global movement…

Arts & Culture
4
The Royal National Theatre

Theatre can lead to extraordinary moments of shared imagination. it enables us to stand in anothers shoes to better understand ourselves and the world around us. it shows us who we are, who we have been, who we could be. the nt delivers on…

Arts & Culture
5
Titan Productions Incorporated

Titan theatre company is committed to breathing new life and clarity into classical works of theatre, exploring new and contemporary language plays, and delivering adventurous and visceral theatrical experiences for our audiences and…

Arts & Culture
6
New York Shakespeare Festival

As the nation's foremost producer of shakespeare and new work, the public theater is dedicated to achieving artistic excellence while developing an american theater that is accessible and relevant to all people through productions of…

Arts & Culture
7
Theatre for a New Audience Inc

The mission of theatre for a new audience is to develop and vitalize the performance and study of shakespeare and classic drama. the theatre is dedicated to the language and ideas of writers - to a dialogue over centuries between…

Arts & Culture
8
White Horse Theater Company

Producing & developing American plays.

—
9
Staretthe Directors Company Inc

The Directors Company is an award-winning not-for-profit theatre company with an extraordinary record in its mission to develop and produce groundbreaking new plays and musicals initiated and generated by outstanding directorial talent,…

Arts & Culture
10
Bow Street Theatre Trust
—
11
The Russian Arts Theatre and Studio

Develop recognition of international theater

Arts & Culture
12
West End Players
Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is York Theatre Company Inc; the most unlike its peers is Metropolitan Museum of Art. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THEATRE WORLD AWARDS INC: $50,000 · OtherTHEATRE WORLD AWARDS INCIndividual grant recipient: $19,497 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNYCity Center: $7,500 · OtherNYCity CenterSIGNATURE THEATER: $6,250 · OtherTHE NEW GROUP THEATER: $6,000 · OtherTHE VINEYEARD THEATER: $6,000 · OtherANIMAL RESCUE FUND: $6,000 · OtherCSC REPERTORY LTD D/B/A CLASSIC STAGE COMPANY: $4,500 · Other+6 more: $6,204 · OtherMINT THEATER COMPANY INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureMINT THEATER COMPANY INCROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC: $7,000 · Arts & CultureROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INCATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY: $6,500 · Arts & CultureATLANTIC THEATER COMPANYPrimary Stages Company Inc: $6,500 · Arts & CulturePrimary Stages Company IncMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INCPLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS INC: $6,000 · Arts & CulturePLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS INCNEW YORK THEATRE WORKSHOP INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK THEATRE WORKSHOP INC+2 more: $1,500 · Arts & CultureGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $250 · Food & NutritionNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $100 · Animals
Other$121,951Arts & Culture$45,000Food & Nutrition$250Animals$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMINT THEATER COMPANY INC: $7,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY: $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPrimary Stages Company Inc: $6,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCSC REPERTORY LTD D/B/A CLASSIC STAGE COMPANY: $4,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK THEATRE WORKSHOP INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Playwrights Realm: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MINT THEATER COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTIC THEATER COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds Primary Stages Company Inc ↗
  • Who funds MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds PLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS INC ↗
  • Who funds CSC REPERTORY LTD D/B/A CLASSIC STAGE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK THEATRE WORKSHOP INC ↗
  • Who funds EAST HAMPTON LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds RED BULL THEATER INC ↗
  • Who funds The Playwrights Realm ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH SHORE ANIMAL LEAGUE AMERICA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Shubert Foundation IncNY21.7× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Shubert Foundation Inc · The Lucille Lortel Foundation Inc · Axe-Houghton Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · The Howard Gilman Foundation Inc · Michael Tuch Foundation Inc · Richenthal Foundation · Jerome Robbins Foundation · Marta Heflin Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dorothy Loudon Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dorothy Loudon Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Dorothy Loudon Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Dorothy Loudon Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dorothy Loudon’s filings →

    More from the funding graph