Skip to content

Wisconsin · Private foundation

Dorothy Kopmeier Vallier Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$175k
Granted FY2026(still arriving)
8
Grants FY2026
6
Organizations funded FY2025
17%
First-time grantees FY2025
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2026
$28,000
Largest grant, FY2026
$40,000
Organizations funded a year
4 to 8
FY2019 to FY2025
States reached, FY2026
2
Total assets, FY2026
$2.0M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2025, 17% of the organizations Dorothy Kopmeier Vallier Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 3% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationMembership BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2026still arriving7$175k14%
FY20256$155k17%
FY20247$155k29%
FY20238$155k13%
FY20224$130k0%
FY20214$135k0%
FY20206$115k17%
FY20195$112k40%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$636kEducation$289kYouth Development$176kArts & Culture$22kAnimals$20kHousing & Shelter$12kHealth$11kHuman Services$6kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2026, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point Foundation Inc$124,42581%
Sweet Briar Institute$21,00050%
Bowling Green Warren County Humane$20,00040%
Hospice of Southern Kentucky Inc$19,00020%
Hotel Inc$11,75021%
Forest Home Cemetery Inc$10,00020%
Foxcroft School$6,00020%
Foundry Christian Community Center Inc$5,7501n/a
Boys & Girls Clubs of the Bowling Green Area Inc$5,00010%

Plus 5 recipients with no EIN on record ($1.1M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Dorothy Kopmeier Vallier Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Wisconsin-Stevens Point Foundation Inc: $124,425 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetSweet Briar Institute: $21,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBowling Green Warren County Humane: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHospice of Southern Kentucky Inc: $19,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHotel Inc: $11,750 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetForest Home Cemetery Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFoxcroft School: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of the Bowling Green Area Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 8.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Southern Kentucky IncKY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Southern Kentucky Inc · Community Foundation of South Central Kentucky Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Dorothy Kopmeier Vallier Foundation with peer funders

About Dorothy Kopmeier Vallier Foundation

How much does Dorothy Kopmeier Vallier Foundation give?
Dorothy Kopmeier Vallier Foundation reported 8 grants totaling $175,000 in its FY2026 IRS filing. It funded between 4 and 8 organizations a year over FY2019 to FY2025.
What does Dorothy Kopmeier Vallier Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2026, its largest causes are Environment (54%), Education (25%), Youth Development (15%).
Who are Dorothy Kopmeier Vallier Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2026: University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point Foundation Inc ($124k), Sweet Briar Institute ($21k), Bowling Green Warren County Humane ($20k).
Does Dorothy Kopmeier Vallier Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2025, 17% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Dorothy Kopmeier Vallier Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as Dorothy Kopmeier Vallier Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include United Way of Southern Kentucky Inc, Community Foundation of South Central Kentucky Inc, The Pfizer Foundation Inc.
Where is Dorothy Kopmeier Vallier Foundation based?
Dorothy Kopmeier Vallier Foundation is based in WI.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Dorothy Kopmeier Vallier’s filings →

More from the funding graph