Skip to content
Dormie Network Foundation at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Dormie Network Foundation

To provide financial support to nonprofits in order to improve the communities in which the dormie network, llc works, lives, and partners, via fundraising ventures including golf events, merchandise sales, and direct contributions from dormie network's membership.

$154k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$102k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.

Philanthropy$133kPublic Safety & Disaster$127kPublic Benefit$100kHealth$87kArts & Culture$68kRecreation & Sports$45kEducation$25kInternational$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $53k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $102k
$42,785
Median grant
3
States reached
$79k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAXWELL RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT$101,599
NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC$42,785
PAC-HAITI INC$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%American Red Cross: $25k → 12%Blessings in a Backpack Inc: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IN
OH
CA
UT
NE
KY
VA
OK
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Usga Foundation

The foundation is dedicated to fulfilling the usga's mission to champion and advance the game of golf, everywhere it is played. its purpose is soley charitable, scientific, and educational within the meaning of section 501(c)(3) of the…

Recreation & Sports
2
Gcsaa Foundation

Secure funding and support to strengthen advocacy, education, and research that advances the work of golf course management professionals.

Education
3
Carolinas Golf Association

The cga is a non-profit service organization that was formed in 1909 to conduct championships and tournaments for amateur golfers in north and south carolina, administer the usga handicap system in the carolinas, and support its membership…

Recreation & Sports
4
The Ben Hogan Foundation

The ben hogan foundation is dedicated to honor, celebrate, and preserve the legacy and character of ben hogan through support of organizations that promote the game of golf and charities that reflect mr. hogan's core values.

Philanthropy
5
The Scga Foundation

The mission of the scga junior golf foundation is to develop an inclusive golf community that enables kids to thrive on and beyond the course. we believe that every kid in southern california, no matter their circumstance, should have the…

Recreation & Sports
6
American Golf Foundation

American Golf Foundation is dedicated to the enhancement and enrichment of communities by promoting the enjoyment of the game of golf and its ideals through charity, education and community service.

Employment
7
Usa Golf Federation Inc

To foster national or international amateur golf competition.

Recreation & Sports
8
Northern California Pga Foundation

The mission of the NCPGA Foundation is three-fold: To serve Veterans - Their health and their families; to provide resources to PGA members serving their communities in Northern California and Northwestern Nevada; and to grow the game of…

Philanthropy
9
Medal of Honor Foundation Inc

The Medal of Honor Foundation's mission and purpose is to provide funds to support the Congressional Medal of Honor Society. In doing so, the Foundation supports the Society in advancing their mission to perpetuate the Medal of Honor's…

Arts & Culture
10
Usaga United States Adaptive Golf Alliance

Serving individuals with disabilities through their inclusion in the game of golf, including but not limited to access, instruction and competition at all levels.

—
11
Pga Tour Charities Inc

Pga tour charities, inc. was established in 1986 for the purpose of generating funds for donations to support other qualified charitable organizations. pga tour charities, inc. makes grants to support exempt organizations furthering the…

Youth Development
12
National Sporting Goods Association

Nsga supports its members' efforts to grow their business and advocates on their behalf by offering the following: 1) resources for recruiting, training, and development; 2) valuable publications & communications; 3) education and…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Miracle Network; the most unlike its peers is Cameron Steinberg Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
14/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAXWELL RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENT: $101,599 · OtherMAXWELL RURAL FIRE DEPARTMENTCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $25,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORKNCGA FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherNCGA FOUNDATIONFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $25,000 · OtherFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATIONPAC-HAITI: $20,000 · OtherPAC-HAITITHE US CHARITABLE GIFT TRUST: $132,867 · PhilanthropyTHE US CHARITABLE GIFT T…TEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC: $100,000 · Public BenefitTEAM RED WHITE & B…NAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $68,152 · Arts & CultureNAVY SEAL FO…ELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $25,000 · HealthELS FOR AUT…PHELAN MCDERMID SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $14,000 · HealthPHELAN MCDE…BEATRICE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 · HealthBEATRICE CO…CAMERON STEINBERG FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthCAMERON STE…ANGELS AND CAUSES INC: $20,000 · Recreation & SportsVIRGINIA STATE GOLF ASSOCIATION: $15,000 · Recreation & SportsGSGA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,000 · Human ServicesBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $10,000 · Human Services
Other$181,599Philanthropy$132,867Public Benefit$100,000Arts & Culture$68,152Health$62,000Recreation & Sports$45,000Human Services$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE US CHARITABLE GIFT TRUST: $132,867 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RED WHITE & BLUE INC: $100,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetNAVY SEAL FOUNDATION INC: $68,152 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetELS FOR AUTISM FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetANGELS AND CAUSES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPAC-HAITI: $20,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetVIRGINIA STATE GOLF ASSOCIATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPHELAN MCDERMID SYNDROME FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetBEATRICE COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNCGA FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGSGA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN8.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Dormie Network Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Dormie Network Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Dormie Network’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home