· Private foundation
Doris & Floyd Kimble Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k28 grants · $128k
- $10k–50k49 grants · $826k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $545k
- $250k+2 grants · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| University Hospitals | $250,000 |
| Tuscarawas Central Catholic | $250,000 |
| Friends of the Homeless | $100,000 |
| Case Western Reserve Univ Hospital | $100,000 |
| Project - Tusc Fair Project | $87,314 |
| Camp CHOF Alumni Association | $80,000 |
| Ohio Outdoor Drama Assoc | $70,000 |
| Dover Knights of Columbus | $58,000 |
| Community Hospice | $50,000 |
| Dover Tornado Club | $35,000 |
| New Philadelphia Youth Soccer Association | $34,000 |
| Project - WV Project | $32,199 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $30,000 |
| St Mary's Central - St Clairsville | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $131k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 61% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +4% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.
108 repeat relationships — 65 still active in FY2024, 43 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $613k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FOFriends of the Homeless8× · 2017–2024 · $545k · revenue +569% · 33% of their budget
- BTBeneath The Shade4× · 2021–2024 · $125k · revenue +2%
- JEJOURNEY'S END MINISTRIES8× · 2017–2024 · $105k · revenue +4% · 25% of their budget
Funded once
- UHUniversity Hospitals Covid 19 Community Response Fundone grant, 2020 · $250k
- UHUniversity Hospitals Telehealth Programone grant, 2020 · $100k
- TCTuscarawas Central Catholic Elementary Schoolone grant, 2020 · $70k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The wayne county historical society is dedicated to collecting, preserving, and interpreting the history of wayne county.
The mission of the clark county historical society is to collect, preerve, and interpret resources which provide understanding and appreciation of clark county's heritage, and to relate to the community's past to the present and its future.
To promote and sustain interest in the history of delaware county, ohio through historical preservation and education.
Museum
To preserve and present the history of warren county and southwest ohio.
Promote an understanding of the history of washington county, ohio by collecting, preserving, and making available to the public, that history, and its relationship to the region beyond washington county.
Historical museum exhibiting historical events occurring in Perrysburg, Ohio, and the immediately surrounding area. Museum offers speaking events and tours.
Acquire and preserve property and information of historic value and/or interest concerning delaware county, pennsylvania. the society also operates a research library and museum.
The Granville Historical Society acquires, preserves, and shares Granvilles past with residents and visitors to inspire curiosity about, instill knowledge of, and foster a commitment to our history.
To preserve the history of ashland county, ohio, and to provide educational opportunities to read about and experience said history and heritage.
The mission of community hospice is to honor life by providing peace, hope, and compassion to those we serve. this is done by providing professional medical care and also numerous therapies, counseling, & spiritual guidance for our…
Our mission has been to maintain the existing interest in the history of Marion County, Ohio, create an interest where it does not now exist and to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret for public education and enjoyment, historical…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Stark Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 204 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Friends of the Homeless ↗
- Who funds GREATER DOVER-NEW PHILADELPHIA FOOD PANTRY ↗
- Who funds MERCY DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Beneath The Shade ↗
- Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds BARNESVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JOURNEY'S END MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CAMP TUSCAZOAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DOVER TORNADO CLUB ↗
- Who funds CAMP CHOF ALUMNI ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Reeves Foundation · Stark Community Foundation · Harold & Marjorie Rosenberry Foundation · Blair E & Anna L Zimmerman Foundation Trust · Tuscarawas County Community Foundat · Timken Foundation of Canton · Dewey H & Irene G Moomaw Foundation Trust · Haman Family Foundation Oag #98-1135 · Hoover Foundation Income Account · Dover Exchange Club Childrens Foundation · Henry & Louise Timken Foundation · Fred F Silk Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Doris & Floyd Kimble Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
- Health Care for the Homeless Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Doris & Floyd Kimble Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Doris & Floyd Kimble Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.