Skip to content

· Private foundation

Donna & Harry B McDonald Charitable Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$493k
Granted FY2025still arriving
43
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$670kEducation$423kHuman Services$318kReligion$313kFood & Nutrition$100kRecreation & Sports$70kHousing & Shelter$58kCommunity Improvement$58kOther$0
02FY2025 · 43 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $93k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $340k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$10,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BENEDICTINE HIGH SCHOOL INC$60,000
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$30,000
ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION$20,000
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$20,000
GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK$20,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$15,000
WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER$15,000
KCNA2 EPILEPSY INC$15,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$15,000
ROTARY CLUB OF COLUMBUS OHIO$15,000
NATIONWIDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$15,000
ST ANDREWS ABBEY$15,000
HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC$15,000
JESUIT RETREAT HOUSE$10,000
OHIO HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $253k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $15k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $10k → 14%HOMELESS FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $8k → 15%THE HOMELESS FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $8k → 15%THE HOMELESS FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $8k → 15%JOSEPH'S HOME: $5k → 17%THE HOMELESS FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $8k → 15%THE HOMELESS FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $8k → 15%JOSEPH'S HOME: $5k → 17%HOMELESS FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%JOSEPH'S HOME: $5k → 17%ROCK IT OUT: $5k → 17%ROCK IT OUT: $5k → 17%ROCK IT OUT: $5k → 17%ROCK IT OUT: $5k → 17%WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $15k → 17%WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $10k → 17%WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $10k → 17%WESTSIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $10k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $15k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $10k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $10k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE: $10k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $10k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $10k → 17%WESTSIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $10k → 17%WESTSIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
IN
OH
PA
NJ
VA
MD
TN
NC
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 56 repeat orgs$234k to everyone else

56 repeat relationships: 32 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

56
23

Total granted

$1.9M
$159k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+105%

Still filing today

39%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $75k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterCommunity ImprovementFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HO
    HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $65k · revenue +27%
  • WS
    WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER
    6× · 2020–2025 · $65k · revenue +14%
  • AF
    ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $60k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • NC
    NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATIO
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
  • SJ
    ST JOHN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • OL
    OUR LADY OF MT CARMEL
    one grant, 2021 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
2
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
3
Hospice of Central Ohio

Patients of hospice of central ohio receive compassionate, individualized end-of-life care. their desires guide the physical, emotional, and spiritual care support we provide. members of our community, patient's families, children, and…

—
4
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
5
Lifecare Hospice

The mission of hospice is to provide medical care, nursing care, pain relief, and emotional and spiritual support services to terminally ill patients and their families.

—
6
Lafayette General Foundation Inc

The lafayette general foundation was created to support lafayette general health (lgh), acadiana's only community-owned, nonprofit health system. we exist to help fulfill lgh's mission, to restore, maintain, and improve health. our role is…

Health
7
Ohio Living Holdings

See schedule oto provide older adults with caring and quality services toward enhancement of physical, mental and spiritual well-being consistent with the christian gospel. the organization is dedicated to living our mission and keeping…

Human Services
8
Hospice of Dayton Inc

The hospice of dayton, inc. is committed to making quality hospice care available and accessible to terminally ill persons and their families, regardless of ability to pay, and in a manner consistent with the highest hospice standards. our…

Human Services
9
Hospice & Palliative Care of the Ohio Valley Inc

Helping individuals live with dignity through the final stage of life.

Human Services
10
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
11
Highmark Health

As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.

Health
12
Union Health System

To serve our communities by provding innovative and compassionate healthcare.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of the Western Reserve Inc; the most unlike its peers is KCNA2 Epilepsy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 90 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
17/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BENEDICTINE HIGH SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $255,000 · OtherBENEDICTINE HIGH SCHOOL INCORPORATEDST ANDREWS ABBEY: $115,000 · OtherST ANDREWS ABBEYTHE SALVATION ARMY: $55,000 · OtherST JEROMES CHURCH: $50,000 · Other+64 more: $933,000 · Other+64 moreARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 · HealthARTHRITIS FOUND…LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SACRED HEART HOME: $45,000 · HealthLITTLE SISTERS …KCNA2 EPILEPSY INC: $35,000 · HealthKCNA2 EPILEPSY …ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $35,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DIS…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $30,000 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER…Unverferth House Inc: $22,500 · HealthUnverferth Hous…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDRE…GO2 For Lung Cancer: $20,000 · HealthGO2 For Lung Ca…AKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Health+2 more: $10,000 · HealthHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $65,000 · Human ServicesHOSPICE OF TH…WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $65,000 · Human ServicesWEST SIDE CAT…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRI…THE HOMELESS FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $42,500 · Human ServicesTHE HOMELESS …ROCK IT OUT INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesROCK IT OUT I…JOSEPHS HOME: $15,000 · Human ServicesJOSEPHS HOMEGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $55,000 · Food & NutritionHome for the Aged of Little Sisters of the Poor: $50,000 · ReligionUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $30,000 · EducationOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationUPPER ARLINGTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $28,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,408,000Health$287,500Human Services$252,500Food & Nutrition$55,000Religion$50,000Education$35,000Philanthropy$28,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $65,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER: $65,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC: $55,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHome for the Aged of Little Sisters of the Poor: $50,000 over 3y, 78% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SACRED HEART HOME: $45,000 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $45,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOMELESS FAMILIES FOUNDATION: $42,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetMid-Ohio Foodbank: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetKCNA2 EPILEPSY INC: $35,000 over 4y, 7.6% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $35,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER ARLINGTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $28,000 over 5y, 6.2% of budgetCLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART: $22,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUnverferth House Inc: $22,500 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetROCK IT OUT INC: $20,000 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetMALACHI HOUSE INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGO2 For Lung Cancer: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetROTARY CLUB OF COLUMBUS OHIO: $15,000 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetJOSEPHS HOME: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE METANOIA PROJECT: $15,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF COLUMBUS INC: $12,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetAKRON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE 2ND AND 7 FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetOHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCURE JM FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHADYSIDE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST SIDE CATHOLIC CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Home for the Aged of Little Sisters of the Poor ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR SACRED HEART HOME ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOMELESS FAMILIES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mid-Ohio Foodbank ↗
  • Who funds KCNA2 EPILEPSY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds UPPER ARLINGTON EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CLEVELAND MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds Unverferth House Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCK IT OUT INC ↗
  • Who funds MALACHI HOUSE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Columbus FoundationOH21.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Ingram-White Castle Foundation · The O'Neill Brothers Foundation · Murphy Family Foundation · The Reinberger Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · The Cleveland Foundation · Thomas C&Sandra S Sullivan Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation · Higley Fund of the Cleveland Foundation · Giant Eagle Foundation · Harry C Moores Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Donna & Harry B McDonald Charitable Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Donna & Harry B McDonald Charitable Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 90 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Donna & Harry B McDonald Charitable Tr’s filings →

More from the funding graph