Skip to content

· Private foundation

Donald Palmer Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.9M
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.4MReligion$705kHealth$149kRecreation & Sports$38kArts & Culture$25kYouth Development$20kFood & Nutrition$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$5k
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $240k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.6M
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLY CROSS HIGH SCHOOL$1,075,000
MATER DOLOROSA CHURCH$500,000
LOYOLA UNIVERSITY$90,000
ST FRANCIS XAVIER CATHOLIC$50,000
STUART HALL SCHOOL FOR BOYS$50,000
ST RITA CATHOLIC CHURCH$50,000
CARROLLTON BOOSTERS CLUB$25,000
LOUISIANA CHILDRENS MUSEUM$25,000
ST MICHAEL SPECIAL SCHOOL$25,000
CYO YOUTH AND YOUNG ADULT$20,000
HOLY NAME OF JESUS SCHOOL$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 18%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 18%LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $15k → 15%ST MICHAEL SPECIAL SCHOOL: $25k → 23%LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $15k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $40k → 23%LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $15k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $20k → 23%LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $10k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $20k → 23%LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $4k → 15%LOUISIANA CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $25k → 23%ST FRANCIS XAVIER CATHOLIC: $50k → 15%THE BENSADON PHYSICIANS SOCIETY: $50k → 23%SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK: $10k → 15%ST STEPHEN'S CHURCH: $20k → 23%ST STEPHEN'S CHURCH: $20k → 23%ST STEPHEN'S CHURCH: $10k → 23%ST STEPHEN'S CHURCH: $10k → 23%ST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH: $15k → 23%MATER DOLOROSA CHURCH: $500k → 23%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $90k → 23%STUART HALL SCHOOL FOR BOYS: $50k → 23%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $50k → 23%TULANE UNIVERSITY: $25k → 23%Lighthouse For the Blind: $20k → 23%LOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $20k → 23%Lighthouse For the Blind: $20k → 23%HOLY NAME OF JESUS SCHOOL: $15k → 23%Loyola University: $15k → 23%ST RITA CATHOLIC CHURCH: $50k → 23%Loyola University: $10k → 23%HOLY CROSS HIGH SCHOOL: $1.1M → 23%HOLY CROSS HIGH SCHOOL: $300k → 23%HOLY CROSS SCHOOL: $250k → 23%HOLY CROSS SCHOOL: $175k → 23%HOLY CROSS SCHOOL: $125k → 23%HOLY CROSS SCHOOL: $125k → 23%CYO YOUTH AND YOUNG ADULT: $20k → 23%New Orleans Recreation and Dev: $10k → 23%New Orleans Recreation and Dev: $3k → 23%Good Shepherd: $10k → 23%American Red Cross: $5k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.5M · 9 repeat orgs$875k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$2.5M
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+57%

Still filing today

22%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $760k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationFood & NutritionArts & CultureHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HC
    HOLY CROSS HIGH SCHOOL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.4M
  • HC
    HOLY CROSS SCHOOL
    4× · 2017–2020 · $675k
  • LU
    LOYOLA UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2017–2024 · $185k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • TB
    THE BENSADON PHYSICIANS SOCIETY
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
  • TA
    THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +57%
  • SM
    ST MARY'S CATHOLIC CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
4/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOLY CROSS HIGH SCHOOL: $1,375,000 · OtherHOLY CROSS HIGH SCHOOLHOLY CROSS SCHOOL: $675,000 · OtherHOLY CROSS SCHOOLMATER DOLOROSA CHURCH: $500,000 · OtherMATER DOLOROSA CHURCH+16 more: $536,500 · Other+16 moreLOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $185,000 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $25,000 · EducationBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $30,000 · HealthLOUISIANA CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $25,000 · Arts & CultureSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$3,086,500Education$210,000Health$30,000Arts & Culture$25,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY: $185,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSTUART HALL: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLOUISIANA CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds STUART HALL ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds LOUISIANA CHILDRENS MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Donald Palmer Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Donald Palmer Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Donald Palmer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph