Skip to content

· Private foundation

Donald and Eunice Dow Charitable Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$38k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$89kAnimals$85kEducation$80kRecreation & Sports$51kHousing & Shelter$26kPublic Benefit$15kHealth$13kPhilanthropy$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$788k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OLD GLORY HONOR FLIGHT$10,000
PATRIOT RIDERS OF AMERICA WI CHAP 2$10,000
PINK HEALS OF MANITOWOC COUNTY$5,108
MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE LAKESHORE$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON$4,000
KAN COOL FOR SCHOOL$3,000
UNIVERSITY OF ST THOMAS$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $73k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 36% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $14k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $12k → 8%HOPE HOUSE OF MANITOWOC COUNTY: $21k → 11%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $11k → 8%LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $11k → 8%HOPE HOUSE OF MANITOWOC COUNTY: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

74%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$272k · 11 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
17

Total granted

$272k
$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+16%

Still filing today

45%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPublic BenefitHuman ServicesCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DT
    Dogs to Dog Tags Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $83k · revenue +701%
  • LD
    LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND
    4× · 2017–2020 · $47k · revenue +26%
  • HH
    HOPE HOUSE OF MANITOWOC COUNTY INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $26k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • PR
    PATRIOT RIDERS OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2024 · $14k
  • HP
    HEIDI PROPSON & UW STEVENS POINT
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • JB
    JULIA BRUNS & UW-MILWAUKEE
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Patriot K9S of Wisconsininc

Provide service dogs for qualified disabled military veterans diagnosed with ptsd, tbi or msi located in the state of wisconsin.

Public Benefit
2
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
3
Milwaukee Homeless Veterans Initiative Inc

To enable homeless and at-risk veterans to reach and maintain their highest level of independence.

Public Benefit
4
Milwaukee Institute of Art & Design Inc

The milwaukee institute of art and design's mission is to ignite curious minds through art, design and service. we value courage to seek our own path, integrity to pursue our lives and work with meaning, kindness to thoughtfully engage…

—
5
Dordt University

As an institution of higher education committed to the reformed christian perspective, dordt university equips students, alumni, and the broader community to work effectively toward christ-centered renewal in all aspects of contemporary…

Education
6
Marian University Inc

Marian university is a catholic applied liberal arts community that welcomes diverse spiritual traditions sponsored by the congregation of sisters of st agnes. marian university engages students in the education of the whole person. we…

Education
7
Alverno College

Alverno college prepares women for lives of personal and professional distinction and meaningful engagement with the world. alverno also extends this mission by offering graduate and adult programs to women and men.

Education
8
Hogs for Heroes Inc

The mission is to raise funds to support injured Wisconsin veterans.

Health
9
Madonna University

The mission of madonna university, a catholic and franciscan institution of higher learning, is to instill in its students christain humanistic values, intellectual inquiry, a respect for university and a committment to serving others…

Education
10
Mount Marty University

Mount marty university, an academic community in the catholic benedictine liberal arts tradition, prepares students for a contemporary world of work, service to the human community, and personal growth. the institution is a private,…

Education
11
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
12
Hilbert College

Hilbert college is an independent institution of higher learning that embraces its catholic franciscan heritage and values. students from diverse backgrounds are educated in liberal arts and professional programs to become informed…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Norbert College Inc; the most unlike its peers is Marquette University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE LAKESHORE: $29,370 · OtherMIRACLE LEAGUE OF THE LAKESHOREOLD GLORY HONOR FLIGHTINC: $28,000 · OtherOLD GLORY HONOR FLIGHTINCPATRIOT RIDERS OF AMERICA: $13,940 · OtherPATRIOT RIDERS OF AMERICAPINK HEALS OF MANITOWOC COUNTY: $13,108 · OtherPINK HEALS OF MANITOWOC COUNTYTHE HAVENS OF MANITOWOC: $12,000 · OtherTHE HAVENS OF MANITOWOCKAN COOL FOR SCHOOL INC: $10,000 · OtherKAN COOL FOR SCHOOL INC+15 more: $68,000 · Other+15 moreDogs to Dog Tags Inc: $83,360 · Public BenefitDogs to Dog Tags IncMISSIONS OF HONOR INC: $15,000 · Public BenefitMISSIONS OF HONOR INCPatriot Riders of America WI Chapter 2: $10,000 · Public BenefitPatriot Riders of America WI Chap…LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $47,029 · Human ServicesLEADER DOGS FOR THE BL…HOPE HOUSE OF MANITOWOC COUNTY INC: $25,977 · Human ServicesHOPE HOUSE OF MANITOWO…Marquette University: $5,000 · EducationLAKESHORE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 · EducationST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $2,000 · EducationUniversity of St Thomas: $1,000 · EducationWISCONSIN VEST-A-DOG INC: $1,500 · Crime & Legal
Other$174,418Public Benefit$108,360Human Services$73,006Education$12,500Crime & Legal$1,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDogs to Dog Tags Inc: $83,360 over 3y, 15% of budgetLEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND: $47,029 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE HOUSE OF MANITOWOC COUNTY INC: $25,977 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetMISSIONS OF HONOR INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetPatriot Riders of America WI Chapter 2: $10,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetMarquette University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKESHORE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetST NORBERT COLLEGE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWISCONSIN VEST-A-DOG INC: $1,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetUniversity of St Thomas: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dogs to Dog Tags Inc ↗
  • Who funds LEADER DOGS FOR THE BLIND ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE OF MANITOWOC COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSIONS OF HONOR INC ↗
  • Who funds Patriot Riders of America WI Chapter 2 ↗
  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds LAKESHORE TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST NORBERT COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN VEST-A-DOG INC ↗
  • Who funds University of St Thomas ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eunice V Dow Foundation TrustMN13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eunice V Dow Foundation Trust · Community Foundation for the Fox Valley Region Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Donald and Eunice Dow Charitable Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Donald and Eunice Dow Charitable Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Donald and Eunice Dow Charitable Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph