Skip to content

· Private foundation

Don & Pat Spiegelhoff Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$34kHealth$11kReligion$5kRecreation & Sports$4kArts & Culture$1kHuman Services$500Public Safety & Disaster$100Other$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$154k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL$5,000
MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY$5,000
BREAKTHROUGHT1D$3,000
SANDHILL COVE FOUNDATION$1,000
MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN$1,000
LOVE LIGHT FUND$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 63% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SANDHILL COVE FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUND: $2k → 10%LOVE LIGHT FUND: $500 → 11%ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $250 → 5%CITY OF BURLINGTON PARKS & REC DEPT: $4k → 10%AURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%UW EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION: $250 → 12%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH: $5k → 17%ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSP: $250 → 17%USA MIDWEST JESUITS: $250 → 14%AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOC: $200 → 7%SANDHILL COVE FOUNDATION: $500 → 10%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUND: $2k → 10%CROSS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $750 → 10%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH: $5k → 17%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUND: $1k → 10%CROSS LUTHERAN CHURCH FOUNDATION: $750 → 10%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH: $5k → 17%JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUND: $500 → 10%AURORA MEMORIAL HOSP-LOVELIGHT FD: $500 → 10%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 17%CROSS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $300 → 10%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH: $2k → 17%AURORA MEMORIAL HOSP-LOVELIGHT FD: $250 → 10%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 17%CROSS LUTHERAN CHURCH FOUNDATION: $250 → 10%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 17%AURORA MEMORIAL HOSP-LOVELIGHT FD: $250 → 10%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $1k → 17%AURORA MEMORIAL HOSP-LOVELIGHT FD: $250 → 10%MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $500 → 17%CROSS LUTHERAN CHURCH: $200 → 10%ST CAMILLUS JESUIT COMMUNITY: $2k → 17%CROSS LUTHERAN CHURCH FOUNDATION: $100 → 10%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $1k → 17%AURORA MEMORIAL HOSP-LOVELIGHT: $100 → 10%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $500 → 17%LYONS TWP FIRE DEPT: $100 → 10%ST CAMILLUS JESUIT COMMUNITY: $500 → 17%AURORA MEMORIAL HOSP-LOVELIGHT FD: $100 → 10%MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN: $250 → 17%AURORA MEMORIAL HOSP-LOVELIGHT: $100 → 10%CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$40k · 10 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
10

Total granted

$40k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+31%

Still filing today

20%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 45% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MU
    MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH
    4× · 2017–2020 · $17k
  • MU
    MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $9k
  • JD
    JUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUND
    4× · 2020–2024 · $6k

Funded once

  • CO
    CITY OF BURLINGTON PARKS & REC DEPT
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • AURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +3%
  • CM
    CALVARY MEMORIAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
2
Rush University Medical Center

The mission of Rush is to improve the health of the individuals and diverse communities we serve through the integration of outstanding patient care, education, research and community partnerships.

Health
3
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
4
Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation Inc

The mission of gundersen lutheran medical foundation, inc. is to improve the lives of patients and our larger community through medical education, research, outreach, and the philanthropic support of gundersen health system.

Health
5
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
6
Truman Medical Center Incorporated

University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.

Health
7
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
8
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
9
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
10
University of Miami

See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.

Education
11
University of Chicago Medical Center

Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…

Health
12
Jaeb Center for Health Research Foundation Inc

Our mission is to expand scientific knowledge and improve public health by designing and conducting world-class clinical trials and epidemiologic research.

Unclassified
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Sandhill Cove Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH: $17,000 · OtherMARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGHMARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $8,500 · OtherMARQUETTE UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOLJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUND: $5,750 · OtherJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FOUNDCITY OF BURLINGTON PARKS & REC DEPT: $3,500 · OtherCITY OF BURLINGTON PARKS & REC DEPTST CAMILLUS JESUIT COMMUNITY: $2,000 · Other+10 more: $5,750 · Other+10 moreMarquette University: $5,000 · EducationMarquette Univers…THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $1,750 · EducationTHE MEDICAL COLLE…SANDHILL COVE FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · EducationSANDHILL COVE FOU…+1 more: $250 · EducationBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $3,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $250 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $200 · HealthAURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Philanthropy
Other$42,500Education$8,500Health$3,450Philanthropy$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMarquette University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC: $1,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSANDHILL COVE FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Marquette University ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
  • Who funds AURORA HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds SANDHILL COVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Don & Pat Spiegelhoff Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Don & Pat Spiegelhoff Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Don & Pat Spiegelhoff’s filings →

    More from the funding graph