· Private foundation
Dolliver Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK | $1,500 |
| AMERICAN LEGION | $1,500 |
| THE MIGHTY MOOSE FOUNDATION INC | $1,165 |
| POTCAKE PLACE K9 RESCUE | $800 |
| CONCORD CARLISLE FOUNDATION INC | $500 |
| THE VERMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $300 |
| DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE INC | $250 |
| PEDIATRIC BRAIN TUMOR FOUNDATION OF THE UNITED STATES INC | $250 |
| WILLARD PARENT TEACHER GROUP | $250 |
| A SHOT FOR LIFE INC | $250 |
| SECOND CHANCE FOODS INC | $200 |
| MIDDLESEX SCHOOL | $194 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
24 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
TRINITY COLLEGE4× · 2017–2024 · $5k · revenue +31%- CCCONCORD CARLISLE FOUNDATION INC4× · 2021–2025 · $4k · revenue +36%
- TITHINKGIVE INC6× · 2018–2023 · $3k · revenue +955%
Funded once
- CFCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF EASTERN CTone grant, 2020 · $3k
- TNThe New England Patriots Charitable Foundation Incone grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +0%
- FHFISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +30%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…
The mission of the lung cancer research foundation is to improve lung cancer outcomes by funding research for the prevention, diagnosis, treatment and cure of lung cancer.
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
Break through cancer is a foundation dedicated to supporting translational research in the most difficult to treat cancers. our partner organizations are among the top cancer research centers and together, represent some of the most…
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
Animal cancer foundation is dedicated to finding new treatments and eventual cures for cancer by funding research in and increasing public awareness of comparative oncology, the study of naturally occurring, similar cancers in people and…
To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.
Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emerson Health Care Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Foundation to Combat Anti-Semitism Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Mighty Moose Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CONCORD CARLISLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THINKGIVE INC ↗
- Who funds EMERSON HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds National Alopecia Areata Foundation ↗
- Who funds Willard School Parent Teacher Group ↗
- Who funds The New England Patriots Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds FISHER HOUSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds BLINDED AMERICAN VETERANS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Pediatric Brain Tumor Foundation of the United States Inc ↗
- Who funds RUNWAY FOR RECOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEW ENGLAND CENTER FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds A SHOT FOR LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds MIDDLESEX SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds American International College ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds GivenGain Foundation USA ↗
- Who funds RED BARN NURSERY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND LIFE FLIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION TO COMBAT ANTI-SEMITISM INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds THE VERMONT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHRISTOPHER COFFLAND MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
- Who funds YALE NEW HAVEN HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Citizens Charitable Foundation · Amica Companies Foundation · Arbella Insurance Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Zachary and Lindsey Gund Foundation · The Boger Charitable Trust · GivenGain Foundation USA · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Analog Devices Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · AbbVie Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Dolliver Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Dorchester Inc — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- New England Life Flight Inc — 5% of income from government
- The New England Center for Children Inc — 3% of income from government
- American International College — 1% of income from government
- Yale New Haven Hospital — 0% of income from government
- Trinity College — 0% of income from government
- The Vermont Community Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.