Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Doll-Loesel Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$307k
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Food & Nutrition$3.1MHuman Services$1.7MHealth$409kReligion$408kYouth Development$295kEducation$103kArts & Culture$84kRecreation & Sports$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $2k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $36k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $874k
  • $250k+1 grant · $307k
$100,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$5.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK$307,000
Salvation Army Bay City Corps Commu$200,000
CAMP DAGGETT$150,000
GORDON FOOD SERVICE$124,466
Senior Friendship Centers$100,000
Beth-El Farmworker Ministry Inc$100,000
HARVEST HOUSE$100,000
LIFELINE PRODUCTIONS INC$50,000
Individual grant recipient$50,000
The Father Fred Foundation$21,000
Faith Lutheran Church$15,000
Ringling Musuem of Art$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $719k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WINGS OF MERCY: $10k → 8%The Father Fred Foundation: $21k → 10%WINGS OF MERCY: $10k → 8%The Father Fred Foundation: $14k → 10%WINGS OF MERCY: $10k → 8%WINGS OF MERCY: $10k → 8%WINGS OF MERCY: $10k → 8%WINGS OF MERCY: $10k → 8%HARVEST HOUSE: $105k → 9%HARVEST HOUSE: $102k → 9%HARVEST HOUSE: $100k → 9%HARVEST HOUSE: $100k → 9%HARVEST HOUSE: $100k → 9%HARVEST HOUSE: $68k → 9%NAMI Sarasota and Manatee Counties: $50k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.1M · 29 repeat orgs$378k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +0% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
13

Total granted

$6.1M
$376k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
-4%

Still filing today

38%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesFood & NutritionCommunity ImprovementRecreation & SportsEmploymentHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $982k · revenue +12%
  • CD
    Camp Daggett
    4× · 2019–2025 · $295k · revenue +80%
  • GN
    GOOD NEIGHBORS FOOD PANTRY OF BOYNE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $96k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • SF
    Senior Friendship Center
    one grant, 2021 · $105k
  • The Houston Food Bankgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $100k · revenue +107%
  • HO
    HARTLY OUTDOOR EDUCATION CENTER
    one grant, 2017 · $60k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Saluda Pop-Up Pantry

Working together to provide nutritious, supplementary groceries to our neighbors experiencing food insecurity.

Food & Nutrition
2
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

3
Bar Harbor Food Pantry

The mission of the bar harbor food pantry is to provide a welcoming environment for the distribution of food and other household products free of charge to hancock county residents in need.

Food & Nutrition
4
South Fort Myers Food Pantry Coalition Inc

The mission of the south fort myers food pantry coalition is to feed the needy of the south fort myers area.

Food & Nutrition
5
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

6
South County Food Pantry Inc

Hunger relief for the indigent. The South County Food Pantry provides food to families and individuals in the Venice, Nokomis, Laurel & Osprey, areas of FL. SCFP distributes to more than 400 family units per month.

Food & Nutrition
7
South Brevard Sharing Center Inc

The mission of south brevard sharing center, inc. is to support, strengthen, and empower families to achieve self-sufficiency. this is accomplished by providing temporary short-term emergency assistance to indigent families when federal,…

Human Services
8
Heart of Putnam Food Pantry Inc Sharing Putnams Bounty

Providing food to those in need.

Food & Nutrition
9
Meals On Wheels Plus of Manatee Inc

The mission of meals on wheels plus of manatee, inc. is to assist individuals to live independently by providing nutrition and caring supportive services.

Food & Nutrition
10
Good Samaritan Community Food Pantry

Good samaritan community food pantry serves isolated seniors, veterans, cancer patients, foster families and families at risk and in need. we deliver fresh, frozen, canned and boxed food items, toiletries and pet supplies weekly.

Human Services
11
Beach Food Pantry Inc

Beach food pantry distributes food and personal hygiene supplies to those in need in dare county, north carolina.

Food & Nutrition
12
A Touch of the Father's Love Inc

The mission of a touch of the fathers love food pantry and ministry is to: ~alleviate food insecurity in the twin counties area through the distribution of healthy and nutritious food while instilling hope. ~treat all staff, partner…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Father Fred Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Boyne Area Chamber of Commerce Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number28%5%<5yr17%5%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr18%15%20–35yr8%45%35–55yr9%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value28%3%<5yr17%0%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr18%20%20–35yr8%46%35–55yr9%27%55yr+

The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 18% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/20
the rest of the field
18%
4,208/23,961

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GORDON FOOD SERVICE — $846,471 · OtherGORDON FOOD SERVICESALVATION ARMY OF BAY CITY — $659,918 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF BAY CITYSALVATION ARMY — $390,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYSalvation Army Bay City Corps Commu — $350,000 · OtherSalvation Army Bay City Corps CommuIndividual grant recipient — $250,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHARVEST HOUSE FOOD BANK — $200,000 · OtherSENIOR FRIENDSHIP CENTERS INC — $200,000 · OtherGORDON FOOD SERVICE CO CHRIS NICHOLS - BETH-EL FARM — $163,766 · OtherCORNEA RESEARCH FOUNDATION — $160,000 · OtherBETH-EL FARM WORKER MINISTRY — $150,000 · Other+21 more — $868,644 · Other+21 moreALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC — $982,000 · Food & NutritionALL FAITHS FOOD BA…GOOD NEIGHBORS FOOD PANTRY OF BOYNE — $96,000 · Food & NutritionGOOD NEIGHBORS FOO…HARVEST HOUSE INC — $574,000 · Human ServicesHARVEST HOUS…WINGS OF MERCY INC — $60,000 · Human ServicesWINGS OF MER…NAMI SARASOTA AND MANATEE COUNTIES INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesNAMI SARASOT…FATHER FRED FOUNDATION — $35,000 · Human ServicesCamp Daggett — $295,000 · Recreation & SportsLIFELINE PRODUCTIONS INC — $100,000 · HealthBERGMANN CENTER INC — $39,100 · EmploymentST MARY - ST PAUL MINISTRY — $5,000 · Community ImprovementBOYNE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC — $2,500 · Community ImprovementThe Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc — $1,000 · Environment
Other$4,238,799Food & Nutrition$1,078,000Human Services$719,000Recreation & Sports$295,000Health$100,000Employment$39,100Community Improvement$7,500Environment$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC — $982,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetHARVEST HOUSE INC — $574,000 over 6y, 34% of budgetCamp Daggett — $295,000 over 4y, 14% of budgetSENIOR FRIENDSHIP CENTERS INC — $200,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFELINE PRODUCTIONS INC — $100,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetGOOD NEIGHBORS FOOD PANTRY OF BOYNE — $96,000 over 6y, 21% of budgetTHE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT — $85,644 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetWINGS OF MERCY INC — $60,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetNAMI SARASOTA AND MANATEE COUNTIES INC — $50,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetBERGMANN CENTER INC — $39,100 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetFATHER FRED FOUNDATION — $35,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSARASOTA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION INC — $17,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetST MARY - ST PAUL MINISTRY — $5,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetBOYNE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC — $2,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetThe Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALL FAITHS FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds HARVEST HOUSE INC
  • Who funds Camp Daggett
  • Who funds SENIOR FRIENDSHIP CENTERS INC
  • Who funds The Houston Food Bank
  • Who funds LIFELINE PRODUCTIONS INC
  • Who funds GOOD NEIGHBORS FOOD PANTRY OF BOYNE
  • Who funds THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT INC DBA - THE MANNA FOOD PROJECT
  • Who funds WINGS OF MERCY INC
  • Who funds NAMI SARASOTA AND MANATEE COUNTIES INC
  • Who funds BERGMANN CENTER INC
  • Who funds FATHER FRED FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SARASOTA PERFORMING ARTS CENTER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ST MARY - ST PAUL MINISTRY
  • Who funds BOYNE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Consumers Energy FoundationMI15.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Consumers Energy Foundation · Charlevoix County Community Foundation · Petoskey-Harbor Springs Area Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Doll-Loesel Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • All Faiths Food Bank Inc1% of income from government
  • Harvest House Inc0% of income from government
  • The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph